Setting up an SPF
Factsheet SPF
Discover how and why to establish an SPF in Luxembourg. Download the factsheets in your preferred language here:
April 14, 2025
Setting up a Luxembourg RAIF
Factsheet RAIF
Discover how and why to establish a RAIF in Luxembourg. Download the fact sheets in your preferred language here:
A detailed guide to the Luxembourg RAIF
For a detailed and in-depth understanding of RAIFs in Luxembourg, we have prepared a comprehensive brochure in English. Click here to download our RAIF brochure and gain valuable insights into the features, benefits, and regulatory aspects of RAIFs. Empower yourself with the knowledge to make informed investment decisions in the world of RAIFs.
April 10, 2025
Your law firm in Luxembourg
01 About the firm
Chevalier & Sciales is a Luxembourg law firm, established in 2005, offering specialized expertise in a broad range of areas. These encompass investment funds, tax, litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution, banking, finance and capital markets, corporate law, and private wealth management. We are known for harmonizing excellence and intellectual rigour with practical, business-minded approaches, aiming to meet the diverse needs of our clients.
Our one-stop-shop service model is designed to flexibly, responsively, and cost-effectively deliver tailored solutions to our clients. We structure our practice areas to ensure a comprehensive understanding of our clients’ businesses and markets. This allows us to work collaboratively with other service providers, offering assistance and services through every aspect of our clients’ transactions and business operations. Chevalier & Sciales stands out in advising on all legal, tax, and litigation matters. Our proficiency is particularly marked in the domains of investment funds, corporate, tax and commercial litigation, arbitration, and cross-disciplinary cases. We excel at managing cases that involve multiple areas of law and possess strong relationships with firms in other jurisdictions. This network aids us in tackling international cases and harnessing a diverse range of skills and specializations.
At Chevalier & Sciales, we take pride in our commitment to our clients, ensuring we remain at the forefront of legal innovation and service.
02 Awards
Leaders League
In the annual Ranking of the Top Law Firms in Luxembourg compiled by French business publisher and rating agency Leaders League, Chevalier & Sciales has been recommended in the following areas:
Excellent
2024 Ranking of Best Law Firms in Luxembourg
Fund structuring
Private equity
Highly recommended
2024 Ranking of Best Law Firms in Luxembourg
Dispute resolution - Commercial litigation
Dispute resolution - International arbitration
Corporate, Mergers & acquisitions
Restructuring & insolvency
Tax law - Corporate tax
Tax law - Tax litigation
Recommended
2024 Ranking of Best Law Firms in Luxembourg
Banking & finance
Legal 500
Our firm has been consistently recommended in the Legal 500 rankings in recent years for its investment fund practice. In 2023, Chevalier & Sciales was cited among the top Luxembourg law firms for investment funds for the 16th consecutive year. Here is what the Legal 500 has to say about our teams:
Investment funds
“Investment funds work informs much of boutique independent law firm Chevalier & Sciales’ deal flow and it is this determined focus on work in the sector which ensures that clients receive ‘very client focused and pragmatic’ advice to fund managers on their fund structuring, regulatory and operational requirements. Although it also handles work in the retail space, the firm has gained most traction within the alternatives space, including on debt, private equity and hedge funds”
Who’s Who Legal (WWL)
Olivier Sciales has been recommeded in the WWL’s Private funds - Formation 2024 edition.
WWL Private Funds provides an in-depth focus on the international private funds legal market, and identifies the foremost practitioners around the world including fund formation specialists and regulatory experts who advise and assist clients in relation to alternative asset classes such as private equity, venture capital and hedge funds.
Monterey Insights
Chevalier & Sciales has been ranked in the top quintile for client retention among Luxembourg fund service providers. The latest affinity rankings from Monterey Insights and Paperjam shows that our firm has been recognized in the 1st quintile for client retention among Luxembourg fund service providers between 31 December 2019 and 31 December 2023.
Monterey Insight’s comprehensive analysis evaluated Luxembourg’s fund service providers, including legal advisors, administrators, custodians, management companies (mancos), and transfer agents, focusing on “affinity” or client retention rates. The research specifically examined how frequently investment fund firms change service providers (e.g., legal advisors, custodians).
According to the article of Paperjam, ‘There are many factors which impact affinity, but this quantitative analysis attempts to provide some insight into which service providers perform the best—defined as retaining more funds—and those that fare less well.’
We are grateful for our clients’ trust, which has helped us achieve recognition in the legal advisory category.
03 Founding partners
Rémi Chevalier
A founding partner of Chevalier & Sciales and a member of the Luxembourg bar, Rémi Chevalier heads the firm’s litigation, disputes, and resolutions practice. He has recognised experience in a wide spectrum of complex and high-stakes commercial, corporate, and financial litigation, as well as arbitration cases. He has appeared as counsel before the European Court of Human Rights and in an ongoing bilateral investment treaty arbitration case with a value of more than $1 billion against an EU member state. Rémi has also assisted clients in cases regarding indirect investments relating to the Bernard Madoff fraud. Rémi, who speaks French, English, and Spanish, has a law degree from France’s Neoma Business School and a degree in business law from Jean Moulin University in Lyon, where he also obtained a master’s degree in tax and business law. He has been highly recommended for litigation and arbitration in the 2024 edition of Leaders League.
Olivier Sciales
Olivier Sciales heads the firm’s investment management and private wealth team, and specializes in the structuring, formation, operation and fundraising of Luxembourg alternative investment funds, which include special limited partnerships (SCSp), RAIFs, and SIFs. He also handles matters relating to UCITS. His clients comprise asset managers, family offices and other firms that manage PE funds, RE funds, VC funds, private debt funds, and hedge funds. Additionally, he has experience in various capital-raising strategies. His expertise includes establishing club deals, co-investment schemes, joint ventures, and providing comprehensive advisory services for PE and RE transactions. Fluent in French, English, and Dutch, Olivier earned his law degree from the University of Antwerp and an LLM (Master of Laws) from Cornell University. Before co-founding the firm in 2005 he worked in the corporate departments of a magic circle firm and a large Luxembourg law firm. He has been recommended in the WWL’s Private funds 2024 edition., the Leaders League editions as well as the Legal 500.
You may contact Olivier Sciales at oliviersciales@cs-avocats.lu
04 Practice areas
Investment funds
Chevalier & Sciales possesses in-depth expertise in investment funds and asset management, offering advice on an extensive range of legal and regulatory issues for asset management firms and investment funds. Our interdisciplinary approach helps clients with the organisation, establishment, and operation of UCITS and Luxembourg alternative funds, including specialised investment funds (SIFs), reserved alternative investment funds (RAIFs), as well as unregulated common and special limited partnerships. Additionally, we assist in the negotiation of service and management agreements. Our team goes beyond addressing purely legal and tax issues. We assist investment managers and fund promoters in enhancing their competitiveness by structuring investment vehicles that are flexible, easy-to-administer, and cost-effective.
Olivier Sciales and Cécile Rechstein lead this department assisted by a multilingual team including French, Dutch, Greek and Czech native speakers. All lawyers are fluent in French and English as well as other languages including Spanish, a vital asset in Luxembourg’s international and multicultural business environment.
The firm is constantly developing its practice, focusing notably in recent years on sustainable finance and environmental, social responsibility and governance considerations for fund managers and promotors.
Our investment management team:
- Supports clients in finding appropriate investment vehicles to meet their requirements and goals from a marketing, regulatory and legal perspective.
- Introduces clients to service providers that meet their requirements, including custodian banks, AIFMs, fund administrators, registrars and transfer agents and auditors.
- Assists with the establishment of UCITS and alternative investments funds such as SIFs, RAIFs, SICARs and limited partnerships (SCS & SCSp) including drafting of PPMs, LPAs, assistance with incorporation of fund and general partner, and regulatory filing with the CSSF.
- Assists with the migration of offshore funds to Luxembourg.
- Provides corporate support services throughout a fund’s lifetime, including amendment of fund documents, restructuring, and launch or closure of sub-funds or share classes.
- Assists with changes of service provider.
- Assists with the listing of fund share or units on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated or EURO MTF markets.
- AML and CFT advice.
- Advises on AIFMD-related issues.
- Advises fund promoters on domestic private placement rules for marketing their funds in Luxembourg.
- Keeps clients up to date with legal and regulatory developments.
- ELTIF advice.
- ESG advice.
Litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution
Chevalier & Sciales specialises in financial litigation, often involving high-stakes and complex and issues relating to corporate, commercial, banking and financial law and encompassing both jurisdictional and arbitration issues, and involving amounts ranging up to one billion euros. Rémi Chevalier leads this department assisted by a multilingual team including French, Dutch, and Czech native speakers. All lawyers are fluent in French and English as well as other languages including Spanish, a vital asset in Luxembourg’s international and multicultural business environment.
International litigation & arbitration
Our lawyers have acquired unique skills, and the breadth of expertise necessary to devise appropriate strategies and successfully manage, represent, advocate and litigate complex financial multilingual and multi-jurisdictional cases.
As a leading Luxembourg law firm with a specialised focus on arbitration, we pride ourselves on our unique ability to guide and represent our clients throughout the entire arbitration process. With our in-depth understanding of the recent reform of the Luxembourg arbitration law, we provide up-to-date and strategic advice tailored to the specific needs of each case. Here’s how we can assist you:
- Arbitration Strategy Development: Our team excels in devising effective strategies for dispute resolution, taking into account all relevant legal, commercial, and practical aspects. Through thorough analysis, we advise on the most advantageous course of action, whether it involves pursuing arbitration, litigation, negotiation, or other alternative dispute resolution methods.
- Drafting and Reviewing Arbitration Agreements: Our team drafts robust, clear, and enforceable arbitration clauses in commercial contracts. We ensure that your agreements are carefully tailored to protect your interests. Moreover, we can review existing agreements and suggest modifications to optimize them in light of the latest legal changes and best practices.
- Representation in Arbitration Proceedings: Our team takes care of the entire arbitration process, from initiation to presentation and enforcement or challenge of the award. We work diligently to safeguard your interests, with a strong focus on achieving favourable outcomes while minimizing risks and costs.
- Advisory Services: We advise on conflicts of interest, procedural issues, disclosure obligations, and the application of the competence-competence principle under the new arbitration law reform.
- Confidentiality and Ethics: We fully uphold the new obligation of confidentiality introduced in the reform, ensuring that all proceedings are treated with the utmost discretion. Our commitment to the highest ethical standards and professionalism is unwavering.
- International Arbitration: With our extensive experience in international law, our arbitration team is highly skilled in managing cross-border disputes. We navigate the complexities of international rules and jurisdictions, offering comprehensive support for global disputes.
Corporate litigation
- Directors’ liability: Assistance in legal proceedings regarding of directors’ and officers’ liability as well as tailored advice on specific cases, such as whether to give notice of liability, whether there is a risk of directors’ and officers’ liability, and measures to protect clients against personal liability risk.
- Group liability: Comprehensive cross-border legal advice on voluntary and involuntary liability of parent companies and subsidiaries.
- Shareholder’s disputes: Assistance in or out of court on any issue relating to shareholders’ relationships, including liability actions on the abuse of majorities or minorities, actions for the correction of registers, disputes over shareholder and other corporate agreements, and litigation arising from share purchase agreements.
- Proceedings relating to the right of investigation: Assistance in addressing requests to courts to institute an inquiry and assistance during inquiry proceedings affecting companies.
- Provisional and protective measures: Measures for sequestration and suspension of effects of general meetings and board meetings.
Investment fund-related litigation
- Prospectus liability.
- Limited partner and general partner disputes, disputes among fund principals and conflicts of interests.
- Assisting clients with cases involving investments in relation to the Bernard Madoff case.
Private banking litigation
- Representing investors in issues arising out of bank-customer relationships.
- Litigation over compensation for substantial market losses.
Tax
Our tax services offer customized tax advice to both international and Luxembourg clients. Our dedicated tax practice serves a diverse range of entities, including fund promoters, managers, investors, banks, multinational corporations, and high net worth individuals. With our comprehensive expertise in various areas, we deliver comprehensive service and strategic guidance to meet our clients’ unique needs.
William Jean-Baptiste leads this department assisted by a multilingual team including French and Dutch native speakers. All lawyers are fluent in French and English as well as other languages including Spanish and German, a vital asset in Luxembourg’s international and multicultural business environment.
Our tax services cover the following key areas:
Tax Advisory
Personalized advisory services covering all aspects of tax, including tailored tax structuring advice, tax opinions, representation in disputes and non-contentious matters with the Luxembourg tax authorities, assistance during tax audits. Our team has a particular focus on :
- Fund formation: Navigating the complexities of fund formation is crucial for success in the investment industry. Our experienced team possesses an in-depth understanding of fund structures, regulatory requirements, and tax optimization strategies. We provide tailored advice to assist our clients in establishing and managing their funds efficiently.
- Private Equity: In the dynamic realm of private equity, staying ahead requires astute tax planning. Our tax team possess a deep understanding of the intricacies involved in private equity transactions. We work closely with our clients to optimize tax structures, identify potential risks, and maximize tax benefits, ensuring a competitive advantage in the market.
- Mergers & Acquisitions: In the fast-paced world of mergers and acquisitions, tax implications can significantly impact deal outcomes. We offer strategic advice throughout the entire M&A process. We assess tax risks, devise optimal transaction structures, and conduct due diligence to ensure our clients make informed decisions and achieve favorable tax outcomes.
- Financing Transactions: Efficient tax planning is paramount in financing transactions. We offer tailored tax advice on debt and equity financing, securitizations, derivatives, and other financial instruments. Our goal is to help our clients navigate the tax complexities and optimize their financing arrangements.
Tax Litigation
Representation in all tax-related matters, including VAT and transfer pricing, before local courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union.
VAT & Indirect Taxes
Advice on VAT and other indirect taxes, providing comprehensive services ranging from advisory support to compliance assistance and litigation representation. We help clients navigate complex VAT regulations and optimize their indirect tax positions.
Tax Compliance
Comprehensive corporate tax compliance services, encompassing both direct and indirect taxes. We handle initial and periodic tax returns, tax provision calculations.
Private Wealth Planning
Preserving and maximizing wealth requires careful tax planning and structuring. Our team assists high net worth individuals with comprehensive wealth planning strategies. We provide personalized advice on estate and inheritance tax planning, asset protection, family governance, and wealth transfer, ensuring our clients’ long-term financial security
In addition to the above, we provide additional specialized services to meet our clients’ specific needs:
DAC 6
Legal analysis of DAC 6 concepts and rules, identification of potentially reportable transactions and arrangements, guidance on reporting duties, strategic advice, assistance in managing the impact of DAC 6 on existing policies and procedures, comprehensive reporting solutions.
FATCA | CRS
Assistance and support in matters relating to FATCA and CRS, including identification of reportable accounts, review of report content and other related services.
AML Tax
Drafting and review of tax policies and procedures to ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) regulations, including assessments of compliance with CSSF circulars.
Banking, finance & capital markets
Chevalier & Sciales has developed wide-ranging expertise in banking, finance and capital markets, including bond issues and debt programmes of all types including classic and new global notes, the preparation of classic or synthetic securitisation transactions, and the structuring of investments and financing operations. As well as advising on and drafting prospectuses, financing and guarantee contracts, the firm is also active in developing innovative solutions to meet our clients’ needs. We have also been expanding our expertise on issues relating to financing of environmental projects.
We also represent investors, lenders and borrowers in the negotiation of cross-border financing transactions, and the enforcement of their rights under financing and surety agreements, and helps them comply with increasingly complex regulatory requirements. We bring extensive experience to advice on sophisticated financing tools and surety instruments including derivatives such as credit default swaps, total return swaps, commodity swaps, options and forward transactions, as well as bridge financing, senior and subordinated debt, securitisation transactions, syndication agreements and pledge agreements.
Debt and equity capital markets
- Bond issues and debt issuance programmes.
- Equity-linked transactions including private placements.
- Listing on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated and Euro MTF markets.
- Clearing and settlement.
Securitisation and structured finance
- Asset-backed securities.
- True-sale and synthetic securitisations.
- Non-performing loans.
Banking and financial services
- Leveraged finance.
- Project and acquisition financing.
- Restructuring.
- Secured lending.
- Establishment of professional sector financial services, such as advising on licences for private portfolio management.
Private wealth management
At Chevalier & Sciales, our private wealth management services are tailored to serve the unique needs of our global and Luxembourg-based clientele. We cater to a wide variety of clients, such as families, high net worth individuals, family offices, privately-owned enterprises, offering all-encompassing advice and strategic direction leveraging our broad-ranging expertise. With our extensive expertise in numerous domains, we provide an all-inclusive service and strategic direction tailored to our clients’ distinctive needs.
Our private wealth management services cover the following key areas:
Wealth Advisory
Our dedicated team offers personalized services across all facets of wealth management. These include custom asset structuring advice, risk management solutions, and representation in both contentious and non-contentious dealings.
Estate and Trust Administration
Our team assists clients in effectively managing estates and trusts. With an in-depth understanding of regulatory requirements and risk management strategies, we offer advice tailored to efficient estate and trust administration.
Private Investment
Our expertise in the dynamic domain of private investment allows us to work closely with clients to optimize investment structures, identify potential risks, and maximize returns, providing our clients a competitive advantage.
Succession Planning
The ramifications of succession planning can significantly influence business outcomes. We guide our clients throughout the entire process, assessing risks, developing optimal succession strategies, and ensuring informed decision-making for favorable outcomes.
Family Governance
We provide customized advice on the establishment and management of family offices, family charters, and governance structures, aiding our clients in seamlessly navigating legal complexities.
Charitable Giving
We provide comprehensive advisory support on philanthropic initiatives and tax-efficient structures. Our services range from compliance assistance to dispute representation, helping clients optimize their philanthropic strategies in line with complex regulations.
Private Wealth Planning
Our team provides personalized advice on estate planning, asset protection, family governance, and wealth transfer, ensuring long-term financial security for our high net worth clients.
Additionally, we offer specialized services in:
Cross-border transactions
We provide legal and tax analysis of international regulatory requirements, identify potential challenges in transactions, offer strategic advice, and assist in managing the impact of international regulations on existing policies.
AML Compliance
Our team drafts and reviews policies and procedures for compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) regulations, including assessments in line with CSSF circulars.
Corporate
Our corporate practice offers clients a full range of services relating to corporate transactions and ongoing business requirements. We assist public and privately-held companies in a wide range of sectors with corporate restructuring, cross-border transactions and general corporate matters.
Olivier Sciales and Cécile Rechstein lead this department assisted by a multilingual team including French, Dutch, Greek and Czech native speakers. All lawyers are fluent in French and English as well as other languages including Spanish, a vital asset in Luxembourg’s international and multicultural business environment.
Our corporate team:
- Assists Luxembourg companies at all stages of their life cycle.
- Assists with the incorporation of Luxembourg holding and financing companies and advises on appropriate legal structures.
- Advises on corporate governance issues, including the drafting of joint venture and shareholder agreements.
- Advises on the implementation of intra-group financing transactions.
- Assists lenders, creditors, investors and distressed companies as well as their management and principal shareholders with support through customised advice on restructuring and insolvency issues.
- Assists clients, their board of directors and managers as well as their in-house legal team in respect of their restructuring and insolvency questions by providing assistance in relation to: Domestic and cross-border mergers, in-bound and out-bound migrations, asset deals, acquisition or reorganization of subsidiaries, insolvency, bankruptcy and liquidation.
05 Highlights of our work
The following cases stand out for their significance or complexity:
Investment Management
- Assisting a Swiss asset manager signatory of the Principles for Responsible Investment with the launch of its second AIF.
- Assisting the manager of an existing offshore fund focused on leasing commercial aircraft and engines with the fund’s migration to Luxembourg.
- Establishment of a SIF platform and creation of around 30 sub-funds.
- Restructuring of an offshore master-feeder arrangement into a Luxembourg UCITS master-feeder structure.
- Assistance with the migration of an offshore fund to a Luxembourg fund.
- Assistance with the set-up and ongoing legal support of real estate funds investing in Germany, Spain, Belgium and Luxembourg.
- Assistance with the set-up and liquidation of a private equity fund investing in South- East Asia.
- Assisting a manager with establishment of a crypto fund investing in cryptocurrencies and tokens, and decentralised finance platforms.
- Assisting a promoter with the establishment of an SCSp investing in perpetual futures contracts with cryptocurrencies as underlying assets.
Litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution
- Representation of institutional, hedge fund and high net worth investors in Madoff-related fraud litigation.
- Litigation regarding compensation for substantial financial market losses, principally resulting from investment in uncovered options and extensive use of Lombard credits.
- Enforcing a €500 Million Commercial Award: Our team effectively represented and assisted a creditor in enforcing a €500 million commercial award within Luxembourg, leveraging the provisions of the New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards. We achieved favorable outcomes at both the Court of Appeal (decision 55/17-VIII-exequatur) and the Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation 70/2018). The judgments for these decisions are publicly accessible online, underscoring our capability to handle high-stakes cases.
- Appointment as counsel before the European Court of Human Rights in proceedings against an EU member state.
- We were involved in a highly intricate US$1 billion investment treaty claim against a European country. For more details regarding this case, please find below the links to the official site of the PCA (Permanent Court of Arbitration) and UNCTAD’s Investment Policy Hub:
(1)https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/213/
(2)https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/904/diag-and-va-v-czech-republic - Litigation relating to errors committed in the performance of a discretionary investment management mandate.
Banking, Finance and Capital Markets
- Issue of a convertible bond for a listed company and establishment of a dedicated private equity fund for the development of its franchisee network.
- Issue of a green bond by a listed company for financing of environment-related projects (including generation of renewable energy).
- Renewal of a bond issuance programme for a listed company, including the conversion of matured bonds tendered by existing bondholders as subscription to the new issue.
Renewal, modification and extension of a bond issuance programme for a listed company specialising in reprocessing of waste materials, involving the issue of bonds denominated in various currencies. - Securitisation of bank receivables with a value exceeding €100m, involving advice on structuring and drafting of contracts relating to a profit participating loan, collateral,
- financing, subordination, services, novation, legal counsel and options.
Financing structure for the construction of a real estate complex with a value of £65m.
Corporate
- Advising an international investor group seeking and funding innovative companies, and assisting with the merger of an absorbed company in Luxembourg.
- Assisting an SEC-registered investment advisor that has conducted transactions totalling some $1.5bn with the structuring of European private debt investments via Luxembourg companies.
- Drafting of a capacity and validity legal opinion relating to transactions including the sale of shares in a Nordic real estate company by a Luxembourg company.
- Assisting a UK multinational on the Luxembourg aspects of the cross-border merger.
- Assisting client in relation to a partial liquidation. Assisting a client with the migration of his company to Luxembourg.
- Assisting clients in respect of migration from BVI to Luxembourg.
Private wealth management
- Assisting a LATAM family with the set-up of a RAIF.
- Assisting a Swiss based family with the restructuring of their Luxembourg fund.
- Assisting a Greek family with the establishment of their SPF.
06 Our DNA
Entrepreneurial spirit
We are committed to devising innovative and profitable solutions that create value for our clients. We understand their need for us to be responsive, accurate and cost-effective, and we always seek to exceed their expectations.
Expertise and experience
Our expertise is combined with interdisciplinary and international experience of complex cases,
detailed knowledge of the financial sector, an uncompromising focus on quality and a continuous learning process. Our partners are often invited to speak as experts in their practice areas at seminars and conferences and write or are quoted frequently in legal publications.
Our attorneys and legal staff closely monitor changes in the law and regularly attend seminars and courses, as well as reviewing materials to ensure we continue to possess a thorough and up-to-date understanding of the law.
Responsiveness
Our firm strives to provide services to our clients in a timely manner. The firm remains in touch with clients to ensure they receive assistance when they need it. We return phone calls and e-mails promptly and respond to all inquiries with straightforward answers.
Integrity
We aim to build and maintain long-term and personal relationships with clients, and our fee
arrangements and other terms of business are transparent. We are flexible and try to help clients manage their legal costs, particularly in times of financial stress. We endeavour to ensure that fee estimates are accurate and that our clients’ total costs remain fair and reasonable.
Professional relationships with
service providers and the Luxembourg authorities
Our firm has extensive experience of negotiation with Luxembourg’s Financial Sector Supervisory Authority (CSSF) and the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and has built strong relationships with Luxembourg custodian banks, fund administrators, authorised AIFMs and auditors.
Comparison table of Luxembourg alternative investment funds (AIFs) and other investment vehicles
Compare two vehicles:
UCITS | Part II UCI | ELTIF | SIF | SICAR | RAIF | SPF | Securitisation vehicle | Unregulated SCS/SCSp | Ordinary Luxembourg company | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practical use | Highly regulated vehicle which can be sold through a EU passport to all types of investors (such as retail investors, professional investors, institutional investors). | Investment funds which could be used for investment strategies that do not meet the criteria set by the UCITS directives. | EU marketing label for long-term investment funds, private equity funds, infrastructure funds, debt funds, funds of funds, sustainable finance, debt funds, co-investments, securitisation, debt funds, investments in fintechs, real assets. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Private equity and venture capital transactions. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Individuals wishing to optimise their personal tax planning (private wealth management purposes). | • True sale and synthetic securitisations. • Securitisation of a portfolio of securities. • Securitisation as structure for intra group financing activities. • Securitisation of non-performing loans. • Securitisation of leasing receivables. • Securitisation of both tangible and intangible assets. • CLOs (possibility of active management). | Private equity, venture capital and real estate investments and any other alternative investments. | Holding and financing activity, commercial activity, holding of IP, etc. |
Applicable legislation | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part I (“UCITS Law”). | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part II (“UCI Law”). | Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds (“ELTIF Regulation”). The ELTIF Regulation has been amended on 15 March 2023 with significant changes which favour the fund market participants, fund financing and investors, in particular, the process of retailization and the amendments will apply from 10 January 2024. The ELTIF column has been drafted according to the amended ELTIF Regulation ("ELTIF 2 Regulation"). | Law of 13 February 2007 (“SIF Law”). | Law of 15 June 2004 (“SICAR Law”). | Law of 23 July 2016 (“RAIF Law”). | Law of 11 May 2007 (“SPF Law”). | Law of 22 March 2004 (“Securitisation Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). |
Authorisation and supervision by the CSSF | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Non. | Non. | No, unless issue on a continuous basis of financial instruments offered to the public. The securitisation vehicle issues on a continuous basis when it carries out more than three issuances of financial instruments offered to the public during the financial year. All the issuances by the compartments should be added up. The issuance of financial instruments is offered to the public when it is not intended for professional clients, the denominations are less than 100,000 euros and it is not distributed as private placement. | Non. | Non. |
Qualification as an AIF | No. | Always an AIF. | Always an AIF. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Always an AIF. | In principle, no (as it would not be considered as “raising” capital from a number of investors as the structure generally serves for the investment of the private wealth of a “pre-existing group” (as defined in the Esma guidelines on key concepts of the AIFMD)). | No, in case • such vehicle meets the definition of “securitisation special purpose vehicle ” under the AIFM Law; • it issues collateralised debt obligations; • it only issues debt instruments; • such entity is not managed according to an investment policy within the meaning of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. |
Exemption from AIFMD full regime under lighter regime (AIFMD registration regime) | Not applicable. | Possible. | No. | Possible. | Possible. | No. | Not applicable. | Possible. | Possible. | Possible. |
External authorised AIFM requirement | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed. Always an authorised EU AIFM. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Always required. | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. |
Eligible investors | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Restricted to: • natural persons acting in the context of the management of their personal wealth; • management entities acting solely in the interest of the private wealth (e.g. trusts, private foundations); and intermediaries acting for the account of the above mentioned eligible investors (e.g. bank acting under a fiduciary agreement). | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Eligible assets | Restricted to transferable securities admitted or dealt on a regulated market, investment funds, financial derivative instruments, cash and money market instruments that are in compliance with article 41 of the Ucits law and the relevant EU directives and regulations. Please note that the eligibility of the asset must be ascertained on a case-by-case basis in view of the applicable laws and regulatory practice. | Unrestricted. The investment objective and strategy of the fund is subject to the prior approval of the CSSF. | Restricted to: - equity or quasi-equity instruments and debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking; -loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking with a maturity that does not exceed the life of the ELTIF, - units or shares of one or several other ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM provided that those ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs¸ UCITS and EU AIFs invest in eligible investments (this wording) and have not themselves invested more than 10% of their assets in any other UCI; - real assets; - certain STS securitisations (where the underlying exposures are residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial loans backed by mortgages on commercial immovable property, credit facilities, trade receivables and other underlying exposures; provided that, for the two last ones, the proceeds from the securitisation bonds are used for financing or refinancing long-term investments), - EU Green Bonds issued by a qualifying portfolio, and UCITS eligible assets. Qualifying portfolio undertaking is an undertaking that fulfils, at the time of the initial investment, the following requirements: - it is not a financial undertaking undertaking, unless it is a financial undertaking, other than a financial holding company or a mixed-activity holding company, that has been authorized or registered more recently than 5 years before the date of the investment (fintechs); - is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility; or is admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility and has a market capitalisation of no more than EUR 1 500 000 000; - it is established in a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country is not identified as high-risk third and is not mentioned in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax prusposes. ELTIFs are not allowed to: - short sell - take direct or indirect exposure to commodities; - enter into securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase transactions, or any other agreement which has an equivalent economic effect and poses similar risks, if more than 10 % of the assets of the ELTIF are affected; - use financial derivative instruments, except where the use of such instruments solely serves the purpose of hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF. | Unrestricted. | Restricted to investments in securities representing risk capital. According to the CSSF Circular 06/241, investment in risk capital is to be understood as the direct or indirect contribution of assets to entities in view of their launch, their development or their listing on a stock exchange. The SICAR is not allowed to invest directly in real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted, unless it invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a Sicar). | Restricted to acquisition, detention, management and realisation of financial assets. The SPF is not allowed to carry out commercial activities or to hold directly real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted. The securitisation vehicle may acquire or assume, directly or through another undertaking, risks relating to claims, other assets, or obligations assumed by third parties or inherent to all or part of the activities of third parties and issues financial instruments or contracts, for all or part of it, any type of loan, whose value or yield depends on such risks. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Risk diversification requirements | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 42 et seq. of the UCITS Law, e.g. (not exhaustive): • a UCITS may not invest more than 10% of its assets in transferable securities or money market instruments issued by the same body; • a UCITS may not invest more than 20% of its net assets in deposits made with the same body; • the global exposure relating to derivative instruments does not exceed the total net value of the UCITS portfolio. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by IML Circular 91/75 (as amended by CSSF Circular n° 05/177). Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS. In particular, a UCI is not allowed to invest more than 20% of its net assets in securities issued by any one issuer. Specific restrictions concerning funds adopting an alternative investment strategy are contained in CSSF Circular n° 02/80. | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 13 and 17 of the ELITF Regulation (not exhaustive): ELTIFs marketed to retail investors shall not invest more than: - 20 % of its capital in instruments issued by, or loans granted to, any single qualifying portfolio undertaking; - 20 % of its capital in a single real asset; - 20 % of its capital in units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS, or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM; - 10 % of its capital in UCITS (liquid) assets where those assets have been issued by any single body; or 25 % where bonds are issued by a credit institution which has its registered office in a Member State and is subject by law to special public supervision designed to protect bond-holders; - The aggregate value of STS Securitisations in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 20% of the value of the capital of the ELTIF; - The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by CSSF Circular n° 07/309. Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS and UCI. In particular, a SIF is not allowed to invest more than 30% of its net assets in securities of the same type issued by the same issuer. | No risk diversification requirements. | Risk diversification requirements are aligned with those applicable to SIFs, unless the RAIF chooses to invest in risk capital only and such choice is mentioned in its constitutive documents. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. |
Legal Form | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA,SCA) All of these entities must be open-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP, SICAV and SICAF in various legal forms, Soparfis, SCS, SCSp, SCA and future forms entitling an AIF to be authorized as an ELTIF. In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCS • SCSp • SCoSA The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCSA | A securitisation vehicle may be set up in one of the following forms: • a securitisation company (SA, Sàrl, SCS, SCSp, SENC, SCA, SAS, SCSA); or • a securitisation fund consisting of one or several co-ownerships or one or several fiduciary estates and managed by a management company. | • SCS • SCSp | • SA, Sàrl, SCA • SAS • SCoSA • SCS • SCSp |
Umbrella structure | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. Application for authorisation as ELTIF of one or more compartments may be submitted | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | No. | Yes. | No. | No. |
Capital requirements | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 6 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 6 months following its authorisation. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 12 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 12 months following its authorisation. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the capital requirements applicable to an ELTIF are the capital requirements applicable to fund, in particular due to the national product law. | EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. | EUR 1,000,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the auhorisation by the CSSF. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the entry into force of the management regulations. • SICAV: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the incorporation of the SICAV. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 • SCSA: no minimum capital. | If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a company, it depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a fund, there is no minimum capital requirement. | No minimum capital requirement. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 No minimum capital requirement for other legal forms. |
Required service providers | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • As ELTIF is an EU label, the required service providers for an ELTIF depend on the applicable national product law. • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. However, if the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, the Depositary shall comply with the UCITS depositary requirements and be a Depositary institution • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Other service providers required by the relevant product rules. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | Registered auditor in principle not required unless two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. | • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the securitisation vehicle qualifies as an AIF). • Management company (if the securitisation vehicle is set up in the form of a fund). • Independent auditor. • No depository institution (unless for regulated securisation vehicles). • No administrative agent. | For SCS: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCS qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCS qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). For SCSp: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). | Registered auditor in principle not required unless the company is an AIF managed by an AIFM with AUM above the threshold or two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. On 28 July 2023, draft bill 8286 (the Draft Bill) was released, aiming to overhaul Luxembourg accounting law applicable to undertakings (the New Law). It is expected to be adopted in 2025. |
Possibility of listing | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes, but difficult in practice. | Yes. | No. | No. | In principle, no. The SCS/SCSp may however issue debt securities that are eligible to be listed on the stock exchange. | Yes. |
European passport | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. |
Net asset value (NAV) calculation and redemption frequency | The UCITS must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least twice a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. As ELTIF is an EU label, the NAV computation and redemption frequency depend on applicable national product law and the AIFM law. At least once a year for reporting purposes. Redemption frequency: In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF; - redemptions are limited to a percentage of the UCITS (liquid) assets of the ELTIF. An ELTIF may offer, under certain conditions, early redemption rights to its investors according to the ELTIF's investment strategy. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. |
Overall income tax (corporate income tax and municipal business tax) | No income tax. | No income tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate: 23.87%. In certain cases, reduced corporate income tax rates may apply. Income derived from transferable securities (e.g. dividends received and capital gains realised on the sale of shares) is exempt. Income on cash held for the purpose of a future investment is also exempt (for one year). | No income tax, unless investing only in risk capital, then SICAR tax regime applicable. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate for taxable securisation companies: 23.87%. Securitisation vehicles should be able to deduct from their gross profits their operational costs and the dividends or interests distributed to the shareholders/creditors. Therefore securitisation companies should not generate significant taxable profits and should therefore to a large extent be tax neutral. | No corporate income tax applicable. Municipal business tax of 6.75% applicable in very limited circumstances, namely in case the SCS/SCSp (i) carries out a commercial activity or (ii) is deemed to carry out a commercial activity. A SCS/SCSp is deemed to carry out a commercial activity if its general partner is a Luxembourg public or private limited liability company holding at least 5% of the partnership interests. With a proper structuring of the GPs partnership interest it should be possible to avoid the deemed commercial characterisation of the SCS/SCSp. | General aggregate rate: 23.87%, but 100% exemption for dividends, liquidation proceeds and capital gains from qualifying participations. |
Subscription tax (NAV: net asset value) | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Tax exemptions: certain money market and pension funds or SIFs investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Exemptions apply. | Annual subscription tax of 0.25% on the amount of paid up capital and issue premium (if any). | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. |
Wealth tax | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | 0.5% on a taxable base of up to EUR 500 million. As of 1 January 2025, there is progressionve net wealth tax based solely on the company's total balance sheet size, regardless of asset composition: • €535 for companies with a total balance sheet up to and including €350,000 • €1,605 for companies with a total balance sheet between €350,001 and €2,000,000 • €4,815 for companies with a total balance sheet exceeding €2,000,000 |
Withholding tax on dividends | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Dividends distributed by a Luxembourg company are in principle subject to withholding tax at a rate of 15%, unless a domestic law exemption or a lower tax treaty rate applies. |
Benefit from Double Tax Treaty network | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | Yes in case the SICAR is set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). | • RAIFs investing in a portfolfio of risk capital (such as a SICAR) Access if set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). • RAIFs not investing in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR), but set-up as: SICAV / SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | No. | Yes for securitisation companies. | No. | Yes. |
Benefit from the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive | No. | No. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No. | In principle yes, but certain jurisdictions where the target companies are located may challenge the application of the directive. | No, unless RAIF that invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR). | No. | Yes. | No. | Yes. |
Thin capitalization rules (debt-toequity ratio) | Borrowings of up to 10% of net assets to finance redemptions (it should be a short term borrowing and cannot be for investment purposes) or to buy real estate for its business. The total borrowing under the above may not exceed 15% of net assets. | Borrowings of up to 25% of net assets without any restrictions are allowed. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the debt-to-equity ratio depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. Borrowings of cash of up to 50% of the NAV of the ELTIF marketed to retail investors and up to 100% for the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | Tax of 0.25% on the debt that exceeds 8 times the paid-up capital increased by the issue premium. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No provision in Luxembourg law. However, there is a specific administrative practice. |
Q&A: Luxembourg Arbitration Guide
01 Legal framework
01 What is the relevant legislation on arbitration in Luxembourg jurisdiction? Are there any significant limitations on the scope of the statutory regime – for example, does it govern oral arbitration agreements?
The legislation that presides over arbitration in Luxembourg is predominantly contained within the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile, colloquially known as the "NCPC". The comprehensive modernisation of Book III Second part of this code was achieved through a law enacted on the 19th of April 2023, which has been documented in the Luxembourg Gazette, particularly in the Memorial A n° 203 / 2023, published on the 21st of April 2023.
Influenced heavily by the principles of French law and the UNCITRAL model law (1985) on International Commercial Arbitration as amended, Luxembourg's arbitration legislation strives to uphold liberal and arbitration-friendly tenets. These directives, split across seven chapters, are set for assimilation into the broader framework of the NCPC.
Its principles are widely accepted in comparative law: they notably include inter alia a broad spectrum of disputable matters that can be settled by arbitration, the absence of strict formalism for the arbitration agreement, the principle of autonomy of the arbitration clause, the positive and negative effect of the principle of competence-competence – whether a legal body has jurisdiction to rule on its own competence in matters before it – as well as the obligation of disclosure on the arbitrator (economic links with companies, former mandates, appointments as an arbitrator or as a lawyer of a party involved) to minimise the risk of conflicts of interest.
Nevertheless, the legislation innovates on certain points by comparison with French law, notably by introducing an obligation of confidentiality, sanctioned by the award of damages. It also strengthens the powers of the “juge d’appui” or supporting judge and requires collaboration between the state judge and the arbitral tribunal to maximise the effectiveness of the arbitration proceedings.
The legislation also aims to extend the international jurisdiction of Luxembourg judges by giving them a jurisdictional head in the name of denial of justice. The arbitration award has the force of res judicata – a settled matter that may not be relitigated – regarding the dispute it resolves and, unless otherwise agreed by the parties to the arbitration, must include its rationale.
As for the recourse against the award, a distinction is drawn between awards issued domestically and those rendered overseas:
- Awards given within Luxembourg may be subjected to an annulment procedure under the new article 1238 of the NCPC, outlining six grounds for annulment. Articles 1243 and 1244 respectively, adopt the French law's revision system and deal with third-party opposition.
- For awards issued abroad, initiation of annulment proceedings is not permitted, but enforcement can be contested under the limited conditions provided for in article 1246 of the NCPC.
In terms of the enforcement of foreign awards, Luxembourg has provided its affirmation and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (adopted by a United Nations diplomatic conference in New York, on 10 June 1958 but entered into force on 7 June 1959) by the enactment of a law on 20 May 1983 (the Law of May 20, 1983 approving the New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards).
02 Does this legislation differentiate between domestic arbitration and international arbitration? If so, how is each defined?
The Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC ») does not differentiate, in essence, between domestic arbitration and international arbitration. It adheres to Luxembourg's revered jurisprudential tradition of embracing a homogenous approach to arbitration, thereby ensuring a uniformly consistent legal landscape, irrespective of the geographical origins or international nature of the dispute. This resonates harmoniously with Luxembourg's esteemed reputation as a commercially attractive nexus for international arbitration.
However, a formal distinction is made within Chapter VII of the NCPC concerning the recourses against awards rendered in Luxembourg or abroad. The central difference lies in the allowance for a revision or annulment of a Luxembourg-rendered award based on the very limited grounds listed in Article 1243 of the NCPC or as per Article 1246 of the NCPC. These former grounds for a revision predominantly include instances of fraud by one party or if the award is premised on falsified documents.
The grounds to reject the enforcement of an award in Luxembourg pivot on principles fundamental to the justice system and include violations of the right to defence, infringement of due process, or any decisions that conflict with public order. In essence, any award that overtly contravenes the principles of natural justice or Luxembourg's international public policy may be refused enforcement.
This structure offers both a robust and fair mechanism for arbitration, reinforcing Luxembourg's commitment to uphold the integrity of the arbitration process.
03 Is the arbitration legislation in Luxembourg based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration?
The legislation draws from significant legal frameworks, most notably the UNCITRAL model law on International Commercial Arbitration and the arbitration-supportive French legislation. The primary aim of these legislative modifications is to foster an open environment conducive to the adoption of arbitration, and a liberal, arbitration-friendly legal environment. This allows for an efficient, flexible, and internationally recognised approach to dispute resolution, enhancing the commercial attractiveness of Luxembourg as a hub for arbitration proceedings.
04 Are all provisions of the legislation in Luxembourg mandatory?
Luxembourg legislation on arbitration, as enshrined within the country's Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), demonstrates an intricate balance between mandatory and non-mandatory provisions. This legislative approach aims to provide both a robust legal framework and sufficient flexibility for parties involved in the arbitration process.
The mandatory provisions within Luxembourg's arbitration legislation are crucial, as they form the bedrock of the arbitration process. They define essential aspects of arbitration, such as the inherent nature of arbitration, the principle of "competence-competence”[1], the right of the defence, the adversarial principle and the rules governing the enforceability of arbitral awards. These mandatory provisions are not subject to change or negotiation by the involved parties and any deviation from them would render an arbitration agreement or award null and void.
On the other hand, Luxembourg's arbitration law also contains numerous non-mandatory or default (”règles supplétives”) rules. These provisions allow parties considerable autonomy in tailoring their arbitration agreement to suit their needs and circumstances. Key aspects such as the arbitral procedure rules, the number of arbitrators, the language of the proceedings, and the place of arbitration can be stipulated according to the parties' mutual agreement. In the absence of such an agreement, the default provisions laid out in the legislation apply.
It is these non-mandatory provisions that provide the core attributes of arbitration - autonomy, flexibility, and efficiency - allowing parties to resolve disputes in a manner that best aligns with their preferences. It is important to note that while this provides an overarching understanding of Luxembourg's arbitration law, individual cases and circumstances can present unique nuances. Therefore, it is always recommended to seek professional legal advice when engaging in arbitration within Luxembourg's legal framework.
[1] For the meaning of that concept, reference is made to question 1.1.
05 Are there any current plans to amend the arbitration legislation in Luxembourg jurisdiction?
There are no current initiatives to modify the arbitration legislation within Luxembourg. This is largely attributable to the recent implementation of a comprehensive legal framework enacted on 19th of April, 2023. This significant legislative development reflects the thoughtful deliberations and consensus of Luxembourg lawmakers, who deemed it necessary to bring about meaningful changes to the arbitration landscape. The provisions of this law have been carefully crafted and thoroughly examined to ensure they are fully attuned to the requirements and nuances of arbitration processes. Given these considerations, it is reasonable to surmise that any amendments of the current legislation in the near future are unlikely.
06 Is Luxembourg jurisdiction a signatory to the New York Convention? If so, have any reservations been made?
Luxembourg, a legal jurisdiction known for its commitment to international arbitration, became a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This significant milestone was achieved when Luxembourg ratified the convention through the enactment of the Law of 20 May 1983.
Luxembourg's adherence to the New York Convention comes with a discerning approach. While embracing the principles of this treaty, Luxembourg has made a reservation regarding reciprocity. This reservation signifies that the convention applies exclusively to the recognition and enforcement of awards granted within the territory of another contracting state, subject to the principle of reciprocity.
Luxembourg's legal framework in relation to the New York Convention, thus, embodies a balanced approach, ensuring the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards within the scope of reciprocal relationships. This commitment underscores Luxembourg's dedication to fostering international arbitration as a reliable and dynamic means of resolving cross-border disputes.
07 Is Luxembourg jurisdiction a signatory to any other treaties relevant to arbitration?
Indeed, Luxembourg, as a vibrant hub of international commercial activity and dispute resolution, has duly acceded to a number of global conventions pertinent to arbitration. In the spirit of encouraging international business and fostering a congenial atmosphere for conflict resolution, Luxembourg upholds its commitments under these treaties. Most notably, Luxembourg has signed and ratified the 1961 European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration. This convention further contributes to the predictability and dependability of Luxembourg's arbitration framework, inspiring confidence among global enterprises. Additionally, Luxembourg is a signatory to the 1965 Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention). This legal instrument provides an essential platform for the resolution of investment disputes, playing a pivotal role in shaping Luxembourg's attractiveness as an investment destination.
Furthermore, Luxembourg, being a hub for international business and finance, has established numerous bilateral investment treaties (“BITs”) with other countries such as Brazil, China, India, South Africa, numerous other non-European countries, etc. These BITs play a crucial role in promoting and protecting foreign investment by providing legal frameworks and dispute-resolution mechanisms. These treaties serve as binding agreements between Luxembourg and its treaty partners, offering various protections to investors and their investments. The provisions within these treaties typically cover aspects such as fair and equitable treatment, protection against expropriation without compensation, and the free transfer of capital and returns. By ensuring a stable and predictable investment environment, BITs aim to encourage and attract foreign investments. However, it is important to note that the landscape of international investment law has undergone significant developments since March 2018. One such notable development is the decision rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Achmea case in 6 March 2018. This decision had implications for the enforceability of intra-EU BITs. The court emphasized the principle of the autonomy of EU law and argued that disputes between EU member states should be resolved through the judicial system of the EU, rather than through arbitration tribunals.
These are just a few of the notable international instruments that Luxembourg is party to, all contributing to an established, balanced, and supportive arbitration environment, enhancing the Grand Duchy's reputation as a prime location for conducting international business.
02 Arbitrability and restrictions on arbitration
01 How is it determined whether a dispute is arbitrable in Luxembourg?
Within the jurisdiction of Luxembourg, discerning the arbitrability of a dispute is subject to certain exclusions as articulated in the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »). Articles 1224 and 1225 NCPC are pertinent provisions in this context. According to these provisions, there are specific circumstances or matters wherein arbitration is not considered an acceptable mode of dispute resolution.
Article 1224 of the NCPC explicitly delineates the scope of non-arbitrable disputes. This legal provision clarifies that any matters concerning the status and capacity of individuals, including issues related to marital relationships, divorce, and legal separation, are beyond the realm of arbitration. Additionally, it specifies that disputes involving the representation of persons deemed legally incapacitated, as well as matters concerning these incapacitated individuals and those who are absent or presumed so, are also exempt from arbitration. This demarcation serves to safeguard the interests and rights of individuals in areas deemed too critical or sensitive for arbitration.
Article 1225 of the NCPC specifies that certain types of disputes cannot be resolved through arbitration in Luxembourg. Specifically, it prohibits arbitration for disputes between professionals and consumers, disputes between employers and employees, and those related to residential leases. This prohibition applies not only during the duration of the contractual relationships but also extends beyond the termination of these contracts. Essentially, this rule underscores the intention to protect parties in asymmetrical power dynamics, such as consumers, employees, and tenants, by ensuring their access to the traditional court system rather than private arbitration, which might not offer the same level of protection. This provision is particularly designed to safeguard the interests of the deemed economically weaker party in such conflicts.
Bankruptcy proceedings also occupy a distinct legal space. Though disputes ensuing from bankruptcy proceedings are ordinarily non-arbitrable, specific situations warrant exceptions. For instance, a company's receiver possesses the legal competence to conclude an arbitration agreement to amicably resolve a conflict with a debtor. Similarly, an arbitral tribunal is vested with the authority to adjudicate a dispute encapsulated by an arbitration agreement inscribed in a contract intended for execution before the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings.
Therefore, while Luxembourg's arbitration environment is expansive and accommodating, these exclusions merit attention. The law maintains an equilibrium between the exigency for commercial adaptability and the safeguarding of certain fundamental rights considered too imperative to be adjudicated outside the conventional court system. These principles highlight Luxembourg's position as a pragmatic and commercially viable locale for dispute resolution.
02 Are there any restrictions on the choice of seat of arbitration for certain disputes?
The decision regarding the seat of arbitration is a fundamental aspect of arbitration proceedings and can impact the legal environment within which the dispute will be resolved. Generally, in Luxembourg, parties enjoy a significant degree of autonomy in selecting the seat of arbitration, however, there may be some considerations that could place certain restrictions.
In Luxembourg, parties are, in principle, free to choose the seat of arbitration, subject to public policy restrictions and the requirement that the arbitration agreement is valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or under the law of the country where the award is made.
For instance, disputes involving public entities or state-owned enterprises may be limited by sovereign immunity considerations or legal provisions related to state entities, which is a common principle in international arbitration law. Certain disputes governed by mandatory legal provisions (such as labour law or residential lease disputes) may not be subject to an arbitration agreement due to public policy or legislative restrictions. Moreover, the arbitrability of the subject matter of the dispute can also impose restrictions. In Luxembourg, certain categories of disputes, particularly those which concern public order, such as criminal or insolvency matters, are typically and in principle non-arbitrable. In such instances, these disputes must be settled by national courts.
Additionally, when a seat outside of Luxembourg is chosen, the parties must ensure that the law of the selected jurisdiction does not contain prohibitions or limitations on the type of disputes that can be arbitrated. Each jurisdiction may have its own rules on arbitrability and public policy restrictions.
Overall, while Luxembourg's arbitration-friendly legislation typically allows for broad discretion in the choice of the seat of arbitration, it is crucial to carefully consider the nature of the dispute, the parties involved, and the specific laws of the proposed seat, to ensure that the selection complies with the applicable laws and regulations. It is important to note that these references are illustrative and not exhaustive. Arbitration law is complex and multifaceted, and the specific legal considerations may vary depending on the exact nature of the dispute, the entities involved, and the choice of seat of arbitration. Professional legal advice should always be sought when dealing with these issues. Consulting with an experienced arbitration lawyer can be very beneficial in navigating this complex regime.
03 Arbitration agreement
01 What are the validity requirements for an arbitration agreement in Luxembourg?
Luxembourg's arbitration landscape is marked by an overarching ethos of liberality and flexibility, underscored in the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), particularly Articles 1227 et seq. In a departure from rigid formalistic procedures, the lawmaker does not prescribe stringent formal prerequisites for an arbitration agreement to attain validity. This adaptable modus operandi solidifies a conducive foundation for both domestic and international arbitration, thus positioning Luxembourg as a preferred destination for dispute resolution.
Arbitration agreements here can be meticulously designed to address a present dispute – often typified as "pertaining to a defined legal relationship, contractual or otherwise" referred to as “compromis” – or can be anticipatorily framed as an arbitration clause - “clause compromissoire” to pre-empt future disagreements. This proactive and reactive scope can be captured in either oral or written format, showcasing the flexible character of Luxembourg's arbitration agreement guidelines.
A unique feature of Luxembourg's arbitration milieu is the allowance of transitioning from court proceedings to arbitration, even if a court case has been set into motion. This evidences the dynamic nature of Luxembourg's arbitration, catering to parties' changing preferences in dispute resolution methods.
At its core, Luxembourg's arbitration domain amplifies the values of party autonomy and freedom of contract. It is crucial, however, to remember that, as reminded above, while the form of the arbitration agreement is not dictated by stringent guidelines, in other words it is not subject to any formal condition, its validity is contingent on the subject matter's eligibility for arbitration and the legal capacity of the parties to commit to the agreement.
In a nutshell, Luxembourg's inclusive stance on arbitration agreements, empowering parties with substantial control over their dispute resolution dynamics, propels its reputation as a sought-after commercial hub for arbitration.
02 Are there any provisions of legislation or any other legal sources in your jurisdiction concerning the separability of arbitration agreements?
Absolutely, Luxembourg, in line with its robust legislative framework for arbitration, does indeed have specific provisions for the separability of arbitration agreements. These provisions are encapsulated in Article 1227-2 of the NCPC. In effect, this critical legal provision expressly establishes the principle of the 'separability' or 'independence' of the arbitration agreement from the underlying contract. It specifies that an arbitration agreement is autonomous, distinctly separate from the contract it is part of. Hence, the validity and continuance of the arbitration agreement are not affected or influenced by the invalidity or termination of the main contract. In essence, Luxembourg's arbitration law, aligning with international arbitration practices, guarantees the enduring validity of arbitration agreements, regardless of any legal disputes arising from the underlying contract. This not only echoes Luxembourg's pro-arbitration stance but also strengthens its reputation as a preferred destination for commercial dispute resolution via arbitration.
03 Are there provisions on the seat and/or language of the arbitration if there is no agreement between the parties?
Article 1228 of the Luxembourg New Code of Civil Procedure (NCPC) sets forth a flexible approach regarding the determination of the arbitration seat. Specifically, it allows the parties involved in arbitration to freely agree on the location where the arbitration is to be held or to assign this decision-making power to an appointed individual responsible for organizing the arbitration process. In situations where the parties do not make such a determination, the provision entrusts the arbitration tribunal with the authority to set the arbitration seat. This decision is made by considering the specific circumstances surrounding the case, including the preferences and conveniences of the parties involved. This rule ensures that the arbitration process remains adaptable and responsive to the needs and agreements of the parties, or in their absence, to the reasoned judgment of the arbitration tribunal.
In Luxembourg, the default provisions empower the arbitral tribunal with the authority to determine the language of arbitration. This decision is carefully made by the tribunal, taking into account relevant factors such as the nature of the dispute, the parties involved, and the specific circumstances at hand. The goal is to ensure an efficient and equitable process, enabling all parties to, fully and comprehensively, present their arguments and evidence. This approach ensures that the arbitration proceedings are conducted in a manner that is accessible and fair to everyone involved.
It is crucial to note that the default provisions may not always align with the parties' preferences or expectations. Therefore, it is highly advisable to include explicit clauses in the arbitration agreement pertaining to the seat and language to avoid uncertainty or disputes. By expressly agreeing on these aspects, parties can exercise greater control over the arbitration process and tailor it to their specific needs and requirements.
In conclusion, in the absence of an agreement on the seat and language of arbitration, Luxembourg's legal framework provides default provisions empowering arbitral tribunal to make these determinations respectively. However, for a smoother and more efficient arbitration process, it is strongly recommended to include clear provisions in the arbitration agreement addressing these key aspects.
04 Objections to jurisdiction
01 When must a party raise an objection to the jurisdiction of the tribunal and how can this objection be raised?
According to the provision of Article 1227-3 of the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), a party wishing to challenge the jurisdiction of an arbitration tribunal must do so at the earliest possible stage of the arbitration process. In the event such objection to the jurisdiction of the tribunal were to be brought before a national court, it has to be raised in limine litis and said court must declare its lack of jurisdiction unless the arbitration agreement is manifestly null and void or obviously inapplicable to the matter in dispute. The objection could affect the tribunal's or court's authority to hear the case, possibly resulting in the case being transferred to a national court. The court does not possess the independent authority to declare sua ponte a lack of jurisdiction. Nevertheless, if the arbitration tribunal finds it lacks jurisdiction, or if an arbitration decision is voided for reasons that prevent the case from being arbitrated again, the case must be quickly resumed in the original court or tribunal.
02 Can a tribunal rule on its own jurisdiction?
In Luxembourg, it is indeed within the authority of an arbitral tribunal to determine its own jurisdiction. This power is explicitly granted by the New Code of Civil Procedure. Article 1227-2 states that the arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to decide on matters concerning its own authority, including addressing any challenges related to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. This provision ensures that the tribunal can effectively address and resolve any jurisdictional issues that may arise, thereby affirming the autonomy and efficiency of the arbitration process.
03 Can a party apply to the courts of the seat for a ruling on the jurisdiction of the tribunal? In what circumstances?
In principle, under article 1227-3 of NCPC, a party is generally precluded from seeking a court's determination on an arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction if an arbitration clause is in place. This reflects a strong legal preference for arbitration as the primary mode of dispute resolution. State courts are expected to defer to the competence of the arbitral tribunal, and in presence of arbitration agreement, the invocation of a state court’s jurisdiction is considered an exception, not the rule.
This exceptional circumstance arises only under specific, and narrowly defined conditions. A state court or tribunal may assume jurisdiction if, and only if, the arbitration agreement is patently null and void or if it is manifestly unenforceable. This could occur in instances where the dispute itself is obviously and evidently not subject to arbitration or if there are glaring legal flaws in the arbitration agreement. Apart from these exceptional scenarios, the presence of an arbitration clause generally compels the state court to decline jurisdiction. However, a state court or tribunal can only decline its jurisdiction in response to a plea of incompetence raised in limine litis by a party. The court is not authorized to declare its lack of jurisdiction sua ponte i.e. on its own initiative. This approach underscores the legal system's commitment to uphold the autonomy of the arbitration process and reinforces the principle that resorting to state courts in the presence of an arbitration clause is an extraordinary measure, activated only upon a party's request.
05 The parties
01 Are there any restrictions on who can be a party to an arbitration agreement?
Under Luxembourg law, the eligibility to be a party to an arbitration agreement is broadly inclusive. Both natural and legal persons, whether from within Luxembourg or abroad, are permitted to enter into arbitration agreements, as long as they possess the legal capacity to do so. Notably, however, there are nuanced considerations regarding public bodies. Generally, due to its roots in conventional justice and its inherent characteristics, arbitration is not typically associated with public entities. As a rule, public bodies acting within the scope of their public authority prerogatives are neither expected nor entitled, in most circumstances, to engage in arbitration for resolving disputes, particularly those of an administrative nature . This is exemplified by Article 2(1) of the Law of 7 November 1996, which governs the organization of administrative courts. Despite this principle, there are specific instances where exceptions are made, allowing legal persons governed by public law to engage in arbitration. These exceptions are often influenced by international law and the evolving landscape of global commerce. Notably, the prohibition against arbitration involving acts of public authorities does not generally extend to disputes arising from international commercial contracts under private law, especially those made with foreign companies. Furthermore, various agreements focused on the resolution of cross-border or international disputes have long recognized arbitration as a viable method. Thus, while the principle generally restricts public bodies from participating in arbitration, the evolving nature of international relations and commerce has led to certain exceptions that facilitate their involvement in specific contexts.
02 Are the parties under any duties in relation to the arbitration?
Yes, parties involved in arbitration under Luxembourg law have specific duties and obligations. These duties are outlined in various articles of the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), ensuring a structured and fair arbitration process.
Firstly, Article 1231 and subsequent sections of the NCPC mandate that both parties and arbitrators must follow the procedural rules, timelines, and formats set for the arbitration proceedings, whether agreed upon mutually or outlined in the applicable regulations. This requirement ensures a streamlined arbitration process, offering consistency and predictability, while also ensuring procedural efficiency.
Article 1231-3 of the NCPC highlights the requirement for the arbitral tribunal to ensure party equality and adhere to adversarial principles, underscoring a commitment to fairness and due process fundamental to litigation. These essential principles, vital across all litigation forms, including arbitration, are detailed in Title II of the NCPC (Book I, Articles 50 and onwards), covering general provisions for contentious cases. These provisions demand adherence to adversarial procedures, the expectation of dignified conduct, and collaboration with court-directed investigations. Importantly, these standards are also incumbent upon the parties involved in arbitration, reinforcing the expectation of equitable and principled engagement. This alignment of arbitration with litigation's core principles via the NCPC affirms the commitment to conducting arbitration with the same level of fairness and due process as is expected in conventional litigation.
Lastly, Article 1231-5 imposes a duty of confidentiality on the arbitration proceedings, except where legal obligations dictate otherwise or the parties have agreed to forego confidentiality. This provision underscores the private nature of arbitration, a feature that often makes it an attractive alternative to public court proceedings.
In summary, parties engaged in arbitration in Luxembourg are bound by duties that include following procedural norms, adhering to fundamental litigation principles, and in principle maintaining confidentiality. These obligations are designed to foster a fair, efficient, and effective arbitration process.
03 Are there any provisions of law which deal with multi-party disputes?
Multi-party disputes are indeed permissible within the framework of arbitration, though Luxembourg's arbitration legislation does not contain specific provisions exclusively governing such disputes. Parties involved in multi-party arbitrations retain considerable autonomy to tailor the arbitration process to suit their needs. This flexibility includes agreeing on the number and selection of arbitrators, a decision that becomes particularly significant in the context of multi-party disputes. The arbitration agreement itself can be structured to accommodate the complexities of multi-party scenarios. It may include clauses for the joinder of additional parties or the consolidation of separate but related disputes, ensuring a comprehensive resolution process. Additionally, the rules of the chosen arbitration institution often provide detailed guidance on handling multi-party disputes. These rules may cover aspects such as procedural fairness, efficient management of proceedings, and equitable representation of all parties' interests.
In the absence of explicit legal directives, the responsibility to navigate the intricacies of multi-party disputes largely falls on the arbitrators. They play a crucial role in determining the most appropriate procedural approaches, ensuring that the process adheres to the principles of fairness and efficiency. Central to their mandate is the commitment to providing all parties with an equitable opportunity to present their case and to participate fully in the arbitration proceedings.
06 Applicable law issues
01 How is the law of the arbitration agreement determined in Luxembourg?
In Luxembourg, in instances where the substantive law remains ambiguous or the parties have not established a clear legal framework, the Tribunal embarks on a meticulous process to identify the most fitting applicable law. This process may involve the application of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 and the Brussels Regulations, supplemented, where necessary, by conflict of laws rules. Save for these specific conventions and regulations, in general, current legislation in Luxembourg does not prescribe explicit other rules for determining the law governing arbitration agreements. Instead, it upholds the principle of the parties' autonomy, allowing them the freedom to select the applicable law. This selection must be explicitly stated or inferred with reasonable certainty from the agreement's terms or the case's circumstances. In the absence of such a selection, Luxembourg's conflict of laws rules will dictate the applicable law to the arbitration agreement. Should the arbitration agreement be part of a broader contract, the contract's governing law might also be considered indicative of the law governing the arbitration agreement. However, this is not an absolute rule; the true intentions of the parties will take precedence in determining the applicable law. If the law governing the arbitration agreement remains undetermined, the tribunal may resort to the law of the arbitration's location, which, in the case of Luxembourg, is the law of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
02 Will the tribunal uphold a party agreement as to the substantive law of the dispute? Where the substantive law is unclear, how will the tribunal determine what it should be?
Under Article 1231 of the NCPC, Arbitral Tribunals are compelled to adjudicate disputes according to the laws deemed applicable. This obligation extends to international disputes, wherein the legal frameworks agreed upon by the parties are given precedence, except in cases where such agreements infringe upon international public order principles. In Luxembourg, there exists a robust tradition of Tribunals respecting parties' consensus on the substantive law governing their disputes. This respect for party autonomy is, however, conditioned upon the compliance of such agreements with international public order.
In situations where the substantive law is ambiguous or the parties have failed to designate a specific legal framework, the Tribunal embarks on a rigorous process to ascertain the most appropriate applicable law. This endeavour may draw upon instruments like the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 and the Brussels Regulations, further informed by conflict of law rules as necessary. In determining the applicable law, the Tribunal considers various factors, including the law governing the contract, the location designated for the contract's performance, and common trade practices. Moreover, the Tribunal may incorporate any additional elements it deems relevant to ensure the adjudication is both fair and equitable.
The Tribunal’s determination of the applicable law is conclusive and binds all parties involved. This methodology not only upholds legal certainty but also respects the autonomy of the parties, thereby conforming to established international legal norms. Should the evidence of the substantive law be inadequately or insufficiently proved by the parties, the Tribunal may refrain from applying the foreign substantive law, defaulting instead to the law of the seat of arbitration. This principle ensures that the arbitration process remains anchored in a legal framework that is both predictable and consistent with the broader objectives of justice and fairness.In instances where the substantive law remains ambiguous or the parties have not established a clear legal framework, the Tribunal embarks on a meticulous process to identify the most fitting applicable law. This process may involve the application of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 and the Brussels Regulations, supplemented, where necessary, by conflict of laws rules.
07 Consolidation and third parties
01 Does the law in Luxembourg permit consolidation of separate arbitrations into a single arbitration proceeding? Are there any conditions which apply to consolidation?
Luxembourg arbitration law does not expressly provide for the possibility of consolidation of separate arbitrations into a single arbitration proceeding. It is however permissible and may be considered whether (i) the separate arbitrations involve common questions of law or fact and are between the same parties or parties connected by a common legal relationship (such as contracts that are related or part of a series of contracts), (ii) all parties involved in the separate arbitrations agree to consolidate their disputes into a single proceedings, and (iii) the consolidation must be seen to enhance procedural efficiency without compromising the fairness and the rights of the parties involved.
The specific arbitration clauses in the respective contracts and the rules of the chosen arbitral institution (if any) can significantly impact and potentially restrict the possibility and process of consolidation. The process of appointing arbitrators in the consolidated arbitration can be complex, especially if different arbitrations have different arbitrators or if the method of appointment was different in each case. The power to order consolidation may lie with the arbitrators themselves. The arbitrators or the court, as the case may be, will consider whether consolidation would be beneficial in terms of time and cost efficiency and whether it would prejudice any party's rights.
02 Does the law in Luxembourg permit the joinder of additional parties to an arbitration which has already commenced?
Luxembourg legal framework governing arbitration does allow for the inclusion of additional parties after the commencement of the arbitration proceedings, under certain conditions. This practice is aligned with principles seen in international law, such as those outlined in Article 1231-12, inspired by Belgian law.
Key points include:
- Application for Intervention: any interested third party can apply in writing to the arbitral tribunal for intervention. This application is then communicated to the original parties of the arbitration.
- Invitation by a Party: An existing party in the arbitration can invite a third party to join the proceedings.
- Consent and Arbitration Agreement: critical to the joinder is the existence of an arbitration agreement between the third party and the original disputing parties, and the consent of the Arbitral Tribunal is mandatory.
This provision is particularly relevant in complex disputes where third parties, such as guarantors in financial obligations, have a vested interest in the outcome. By allowing the inclusion of additional parties, Luxembourg legal system ensures a comprehensive and equitable resolution process that acknowledges the interconnected nature of modern commercial and legal relationships.
03 Does an arbitration agreement bind assignees or other third parties?
Under Luxembourg law, the binding nature of an arbitration agreement typically does not extend to third parties as a general rule. Nevertheless, there are substantial exceptions to this principle inter alia in case of an assignment of the contract. These exceptions arise when the arbitration agreement implicitly encompasses such parties, or when they have implicitly or necessarily accepted its terms. The impact of the arbitration clause on third parties largely depends on the precise wording used in the agreement and the specific context of each case. Central to this issue is the foundational principle that an arbitrator's authority is based on the expressed intent of the involved parties, reflecting the contractual essence of arbitration. Importantly, judicial precedents have recognized situations in which parties' actions may imply their agreement to arbitration, despite not having formally signed the arbitration agreement. This broader interpretation allows the arbitration clause to affect third parties, particularly when they play a significant role in the implementation of the contract at the heart of the dispute.
08 The tribunal
01 How is the tribunal appointed?
The appointment of the tribunal in Luxembourg arbitration law, as governed by the provisions of the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), is a structured process that ensures fairness and efficiency in the constitution of the arbitral tribunal.
Indeed, according to Article 1228-2 of the NCPC, the parties involved in the arbitration have the flexibility to appoint arbitrators directly or through reference to specific arbitration rules or procedures. This can include the designation of arbitrators or the modalities for their appointment. The parties are free to decide the number of arbitrators. In scenarios where there is no agreement on this matter, the default number is set at three arbitrators.
As per Article 1228-4 (1°) of the NCPC, in cases where a single arbitrator is to be appointed and the parties cannot reach a consensus on the choice, the appointment is then made by the person responsible for organizing the arbitration or, if such a person is not designated, by the supporting judge.
Where the arbitration is to be conducted by three arbitrators (Article 1228-4 (2°)), each party selects one arbitrator. These two arbitrators then jointly appoint the third. If a party does not choose an arbitrator within one month of a request, or if the first two arbitrators cannot agree on the third within a month of the last arbitrator's acceptance, the appointment is made by the afore-mentioned responsible person or the supporting judge.
Finally, Article 1228-4 (4°) of NCPC stipulates that any other disagreements concerning the appointment of arbitrators are to be resolved by the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, in their absence, by the supporting judge.
In summary, the Luxembourg arbitration framework outlined in the NCPC provides a comprehensive and flexible mechanism for the appointment of arbitrators, catering to various scenarios and ensuring that the arbitral tribunal is constituted in a manner that is equitable and conducive to the efficient resolution of disputes. The process underscores the importance of party autonomy in arbitration while also providing an effective fallback mechanism through the involvement of a responsible person or a supporting judge to facilitate appointments when parties cannot reach an agreement. This approach balances the principles of fairness, efficiency, and party autonomy, which are crucial in the context of commercial and professional arbitration.
02 Are there any requirements as to the number or qualification of arbitrators in Luxembourg?
In Luxembourg's arbitration framework, the stipulations regarding the number and qualifications of arbitrators are notably flexible, aligning with the commercial needs of the parties involved. Parties have the autonomy to determine the number of arbitrators through their arbitration agreement. Should they not specify this in the agreement, the default number is set at three. This fallback number can also be determined by the person in charge of organizing the arbitration chosen by the parties or, if necessary, by the supporting court. As for the qualifications, the key requirement for arbitrators in Luxembourg is to uphold impartiality and independence, ensuring an equitable and unbiased arbitration process. This approach reflects Luxembourg's commitment to fostering a dynamic and fair arbitration environment, adaptable to the diverse requirements of international commerce.
03 Can an arbitrator be challenged in Luxembourg? If so, on what basis? Are there any restrictions on the challenge of an arbitrator?
An arbitrator can be challenged under specific circumstances as per Luxembourg legal framework. The primary grounds for challenging an arbitrator, as outlined in Article 1228-7 NCPC, are circumstances that raise legitimate doubts about his or her impartiality or independence, or if the arbitrator lacks the qualifications agreed upon by the parties. If a dispute arises regarding the challenge, it is initially addressed by the entity responsible for organizing the arbitration. In the absence of such a body, the supporting judge intervenes and the parties must refer the matter to the court within one month of the disputed fact's disclosure or discovery. Furthermore, as stated in Article 1228-8 NCPC an arbitrator can only be dismissed with the unanimous consent of all parties involved. If unanimity is not achieved, the same procedure of arbitration organization or judicial intervention applies, with a similar one-month timeframe for resolution. While Luxembourg does permit the challenging and potential dismissal of an arbitrator, it does so within a structured and judicious framework. This approach safeguards the arbitration process's integrity and fairness, ensuring challenges are substantiated and resolved swiftly. These measures guarantee that the appointment, evaluation and potential removal of arbitrators occur in an equitable, organized, and prompt manner.
04 If a challenge is successful, how is the arbitrator replaced?
Arbitrators are expected to continue their duties until the conclusion of their assignment, barring any legitimate reasons for abstention such as an inability to fulfil their role or a valid reason for abstaining or resigning. In the event of a successful challenge against an arbitrator, the replacement process is guided by the principles outlined in Art. 1228-9 NCPC. The appointment of a new arbitrator is conducted in alignment with the procedures initially agreed upon or followed by the parties for the appointment of the original arbitrator.
05 What duties are imposed on arbitrators? Are these all imposed by legislation?
In light of the provision of article 1228-6 NCPC, the duties imposed on arbitrators include not only the obligation to disclose any circumstances that could affect their independence or impartiality before accepting their appointment but also an obligation of confidentiality as arbitration proceedings, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, are strictly confidential. Additionally, arbitrators are required to promptly disclose any similar circumstances that may arise after accepting their appointment. This underscores the importance of arbitrators maintaining their impartiality and independence throughout the arbitration process and ensuring they meet the necessary qualifications agreed upon by the parties.
06 What powers does an arbitrator have in relation to procedure, including evidence?
Arbitrator's Role in Regulating Procedure
Under Art. 1231-2 NCPC, an arbitration tribunal has significant discretion in regulating the procedure of arbitral proceedings. This can be outlined in the arbitration agreement, either directly or by referencing specific arbitration rules or procedural guidelines. In cases where the arbitration agreement does not specify procedural details, the tribunal is empowered to establish the necessary procedural framework. Notably, this discretion allows the arbitrator to deviate from the procedures typical in state courts, offering a more tailored approach to dispute resolution provided that, as per Article 1231-3 NCPC, under all circumstances, the tribunal, ensures equality and adherence to the adversarial principle and equality between parties. This ensures that all parties have a fair opportunity to present their case and respond to the other party's arguments, upholding the integrity and balance of the arbitration process.
Investigative Powers and Handling of Evidence
According to Article 1231-8 NCPC, the arbitral tribunal is authorized to conduct necessary investigations. It can hear any person, including the parties involved, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of the case. This hearing process is not bound by oath-taking unless a foreign law applicable to the proceedings dictates otherwise. If a party possesses relevant evidence, the tribunal can order its production in a manner deemed appropriate. This grants the arbitrator substantial control over the evidentiary aspects of the case. When a party relies on a document held by a third party, the arbitrator can facilitate its procurement. The party can, upon the arbitrator's request, summon the third party before a supporting judge to obtain or produce the document.
The arbitration tribunal, in this legal framework, wields considerable power over procedural matters and the handling of evidence. This includes the ability to tailor the process to the specifics of the case, ensuring fairness and comprehensive consideration of all relevant materials and testimonies. Such flexibility and authority underscore the effectiveness and efficiency of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method, tailored to meet the unique needs of the parties involved while maintaining procedural integrity.
06 What powers does an arbitrator have in relation to interim relief?
Understanding the Scope of Arbitrator Powers
Arbitrators' Authority to Order Provisional Measures: under Article 1231-9 NCPC, arbitrators have significant latitude to order parties to undertake provisional or protective measures deemed appropriate. This capacity is a fundamental aspect of an arbitrator's role in ensuring the effectiveness and fairness of the arbitration process.
Conditions and Limitations: it is crucial to note that this authority is subject to certain conditions the arbitral tribunal determines, offering a tailored approach to each case's unique dynamics.
Exclusions - State Court Jurisdiction: importantly, the applicable provision clarifies that the power to order seizures remains exclusively within the jurisdiction of state courts. This distinction ensures a balance between the arbitrator's authority and the traditional powers of state judiciary systems.
Modifications and Adjustments to Interim Measures: arbitrators are not only empowered to order interim measures but also have the flexibility to modify, supplement, suspend, or revoke these measures. This dynamic ability allows arbitrators to respond effectively to evolving case circumstances, ensuring that interim measures remain relevant and fair throughout the arbitration process.
Ensuring Fairness through security for interim measures: a critical aspect of an arbitrator's power is the discretion to require a party requesting an interim measure to provide appropriate security. This requirement is a safeguard, promoting responsibility and mitigating potential misuse of the interim relief process.
Arbitrators in modern commercial arbitration play a pivotal, balanced and, yet dynamic role in managing interim relief measures, characterized by a balance of authority, flexibility, and responsibility. Their powers, as outlined in Article 1231-9 NCPC, reflect a comprehensive approach, ensuring that interim measures are used effectively and judiciously, in alignment with the overarching goal of fair and efficient dispute resolution.
06 What powers does an arbitrator have in relation to parties which do not comply with its orders?
Under the guiding principles of Art. 1231-13, an arbitrator is vested with significant authority to ensure compliance with their decisions. This encompasses not only final judgments but also extends to interim or protective measures and measures of inquiry. In instances where parties fail to adhere to the arbitrator's orders, the arbitrator has the discretion to impose penalties. This power is crucial in maintaining the efficacy and integrity of the arbitration process. Primarily, it acts as a deterrent against non-compliance, reinforcing the seriousness and binding nature of the arbitrator's orders. Additionally, it ensures that all parties engage in the arbitration process in good faith, respecting the temporary measures or inquiries that may be pivotal in the resolution of the dispute.
In essence, the authority to levy penalties under Art. 1231-13 is a vital tool in the arbitrator's arsenal. It not only upholds the enforceability of their decisions but also underpins the overall effectiveness and credibility of the arbitration process as a means of dispute resolution. This power must, however, be exercised judiciously and in alignment with the principles of fairness and justice, which are the cornerstones of arbitration.
06 What powers does an arbitrator have in relation to issuing partial final awards?
An arbitration tribunal may issue partial award.
06 What powers does an arbitrator have in relation to the remedies it can grant in a final award?
In Luxembourg, public policy is the only exception to the broad scope of relief that can be requested and granted. This matter is considered under the substantive law of Luxembourg, allowing for a wide range of legal remedies without specific restrictions.
06 What powers does an arbitrator have in relation to Interest?
Within the bounds of the applicable Luxembourg laws, arbitration tribunals enjoy considerable discretion in awarding interest, a freedom that is circumscribed only by specific considerations regarding compounding interest and stringent anti-usury laws. According to Article 1154 of the Luxembourg Civil Code, interest accrued on principal amounts may compound, thereby generating further interest, provided there is either a “judicial” demand or a special agreement that explicitly addresses interest owed for at least one year. Luxembourg's rigorous usury laws, under article 494 of the code Penal meticulously define and penalize only those usurious practices that exploit a borrower's vulnerability through the repeated imposition of unauthorized rates. This precise interpretation ensures that instances of usury are rarely recognized under Luxembourg law, striking a careful balance between the protection of borrowers and the legitimate accrual of interest under specific conditions.
07 How may a tribunal seated in your jurisdiction proceed if a party does not participate in the arbitration?
In cases where a respondent does not participate in arbitration without justifiable reason, the tribunal has the authority to proceed and render an award based on the evidence available. In adherence to the key adversarial principle, the tribunal ensures non-participating parties are given ample opportunity to engage, clarifying that their absence does not constitute consent to the claims presented.
Should the claimants fail to present their case, the tribunal is obligated to dismiss the arbitration, preserving the rights of other parties to pursue their claims independently. Conversely, if the respondent fails to articulate its defence, the tribunal will advance the proceedings, ensuring that such non-participation is not deemed an implicit agreement to the claimant's demands and allegations. Additionally, the tribunal may progress with the arbitration in the event of a party's non-engagement in oral hearings or failure to produce documents, making determinations based on the evidence available.
The tribunal possesses the capacity to issue a default award, provided that the non-defaulting party substantiates its claim and demands. Such a default award is enforceable in court just like a standard award.
09 The role of the court during an arbitration
01 Will the court in Luxembourg stay proceedings and refer parties to arbitration if there is an arbitration agreement?
Pursuant to Article 1227-3 of the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), should a dispute that falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement be submitted to a state court, the court must defer jurisdiction, with the exception being circumstances wherein the arbitration agreement is null and void due to the non-arbitrability of the dispute, or if the agreement is obviously null and void or obviously inapplicable for any other reason. However, the court is precluded from unilaterally – sua ponte - asserting its lack of jurisdiction; such a challenge must be proactively raised at the preliminary stage of the legal proceedings. The effectiveness of this challenge hinges solely on its being raised 'in limine litis.' Should there be a failure to present this challenge at the 'in limine litis' stage, it may result in the presumption that the case has been transferred to the jurisdiction of state courts. If the arbitral tribunal adjudicates itself as lacking jurisdiction, or if an arbitral award is vacated on grounds that preclude the possibility of reconvening the tribunal, the litigation shall resume before the initially seized court, contingent upon the notification to the court registry and the other parties involved by either of the parties or a single party regarding this specific juncture.
02 Does the court in your jurisdiction have any powers in relation to an arbitration seated in your jurisdiction and/or seated outside Luxembourg? What are these powers? Under what conditions are these powers exercised?
Under the provisions of Article 1227-4 of the NCPC, Luxembourg law delineates specific and limited circumstances under which courts may exercise jurisdiction over arbitration matters, whether seated within or outside Luxembourg. Notably, before the formation of an arbitral tribunal, or in instances where it becomes apparent that the arbitration tribunal is incapable of granting the requested measure, the existence of an arbitration agreement does not preclude a party from seeking judicial intervention. For instance, the arbitral tribunal lacks jurisdiction to order attachment proceedings, as only the state court possesses the authority to order seizures (Article 1231-9 NCPC). Similarly, the tribunal cannot compel the forced production of documents held by a third party, a measure that is exclusively within the state court’s purview (Article 1231-8 NCPC). This intervention may be sought for the purposes of obtaining measures of inquiry, or interim or protective measures, without such action constituting a waiver of the arbitration agreement.
Luxembourg courts exercise a markedly restrained approach towards involvement in arbitral proceedings, adhering closely to the principle of party autonomy and respecting the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction. This approach is manifested in the courts' limited authority to intervene, which is exercised only under narrowly defined conditions, either at the request of one of the parties involved in the arbitration or by the arbitral tribunal itself. The overarching principle guiding this legal framework is the respect for the arbitral process, ensuring that the tribunal's authority to manage the proceedings is maintained with minimal state court interference.
03 Can the parties exclude the court’s powers by agreement?
While the power and authority of an arbitral tribunal to order provisional or conservatory measures, except in situations explicitly outlined by law such as ordering attachments or the delivery of piece of evidence held by third parties, can be restricted or nullified by mutual agreement of the parties involved (as per Article 1231-9 of the NCPC), the jurisdiction and powers bestowed upon the supporting judge (“juge d’appui”) or state courts originate predominantly from public policy rules. Consequently, these powers are inherently and generally beyond the scope of limitation or exclusion through party agreements.
10 Costs
01 How will the tribunal approach the issue of costs?
In arbitration proceedings seated in Luxembourg, the tribunal possesses considerable latitude in determining the allocation of costs associated with the arbitration. This includes arbitrators' fees and expenses, administrative fees, and the legal and other expenses reasonably incurred by the participating parties.
The tribunal has the authority to require one party to bear another's costs, wholly or partially, particularly if it finds evidence of frivolous, improper, or bad-faith actions. The final award will address the arbitration costs and specify the responsible parties or their sharing proportion. The tribunal may incorporate any relevant circumstances into its cost-related decisions, emphasizing the importance of conducting the arbitration in an expedient and cost-effective manner.
Ultimately, the approach to arbitration costs in Luxembourg is designed to be adaptive, enabling the tribunal to tailor the cost allocation to the specifics of each case, thereby reflecting the principles of fairness and efficiency inherent in the arbitration process.
02 Are there any restrictions on what the parties can agree in terms of costs in an arbitration seated in Luxembourg?
Parties have the autonomy to agree on how these costs should be divided. Absent such an agreement, the tribunal is tasked with making this determination. The tribunal's approach to cost allocation is not rigid; it may distribute costs in direct correlation to each party's success
in the arbitration, divide them equally, or adopt a different distribution as deemed fitting. This flexibility allows the tribunal to consider various factors, including the case's complexity, the parties' conduct, the arbitration outcome, and any settlement proposals made.
11 Funding
01 Is third-party funding permitted for arbitrations seated in Luxembourg?
In arbitrations seated within the jurisdiction of Luxembourg, third-party funding is allowed. Luxembourg law does not contain specific provisions that directly address third-party funding in the context of arbitration; nevertheless, the practice is accepted and gaining prominence. Though not legally compelling, most arrangements for third-party funding adhere to the ethical standards and rules of professional conduct that apply to legal practitioners representing the parties involved in the arbitration or to the Code of Conduct for Litigation Funders. The arbitral tribunal may consider the presence of third-party funding arrangements when making decisions regarding the allocation of costs.
Some rules of public order may restrict the parties’ discretion and possibilities in agreeing third-party funding contracts. For example, pure pacta de quota litis are held to be void under Luxembourg laws. Therefore, in the context of Luxembourg law, while third-party funding is permitted, the autonomy of the parties involved is not absolute and may encounter limitations due to public order regulations. For instance, agreements based solely on pacta de quota litis - whereby fees are contingent solely on the litigation's outcome - are deemed invalid. This stipulation underscores the legal framework's commitment to ensuring that agreements do not contravene key principles of fairness and ethical standards without which no Justice can be rendered. In navigating these waters, it is essential for parties to be acutely aware of the nuanced restrictions that safeguard the integrity of the legal process and the access to a tribunal, ensuring that the pursuit of justice remains untainted by arrangements that might otherwise compromise it. This careful balance reflects a broader principle inherent in Luxembourg's legal system: while innovation in legal financing is acknowledged if not favoured, it must not overstep the bounds of what is considered crucial under the eye of Justice.
12 Award
01 What procedural and substantive requirements must be met by an award?
To fulfil both procedural and substantive requirements, an arbitral award must adhere to specific legal and regulatory standards. Firstly, arbitrators are obliged to resolve disputes in accordance with the law applicable to the substance of the dispute and the rules governing the proceedings. The award itself must meet several criteria:
- It must be documented in writing and bear the signatures of either all arbitrators or those who concur with the decision, as provided for by article 1232-1 of the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC»);
- It should explicitly state the reasons behind the decision, except in cases where the parties have mutually agreed to waive this requirement, in accordance with Article 1232-2 NCPC;
- Additionally and although the relevant Luxembourg provisions do not impose it, the award should clearly indicate the arbitration's venue and the date when the decision was rendered.
The arbitration agreement or rules may permit arbitrators to include their individual or dissenting views within the award, as per Article 1232 NCPC. Once issued, the award carries the authority of a final and conclusive judgment (res judicata) and must be promptly distributed to each party in signed form, as mandated by Article 1232-3 NCPC. Lastly, a party has the right to formally serve the award. This comprehensive framework ensures that the award is not only legally compliant but also transparent and accountable to the parties involved.
02 Must the award be produced within a certain timeframe?
The legislation in Luxembourg does not prescribe a definitive period for the issuance of an arbitral award. However, it can be deduced from Article 1231-6 of the NCPC that, in the absence of a specified timeframe within the arbitration agreement, the term of the arbitral tribunal's mandate is confined to six months, commencing from the acceptance date of the last arbitrator's appointment. This provision implies that, since the authority and assignment of arbitrators must be completed within six-months, the award should logically be issued within the same timeframe. Nonetheless, the parties involved may mutually agree upon a specific and distinct delay for the delivery of the arbitral award.
13 Enforcement of awards
01 Are awards enforced in Luxembourg? Under what procedure?
In Luxembourg, both domestic and international arbitral awards are enforceable, reflecting the jurisdiction's favourable stance towards arbitration enforcement. The enforcement process for foreign award is delineated by the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which Luxembourg adheres to under the principle of reciprocity (see law on 20 May 1983 (the Law of May 20, 1983 approving the New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards). This applies to awards issued within the territories of states that are parties to the Convention. For awards originating from states not party to the Convention, subject to strict conditions, enforcement within Luxembourg remains however possible.
To initiate enforcement, the applicant must submit to the president of the Luxembourg district court a specific request, the original award or a certified copy, along with the arbitration agreement. If these documents are not in French, German, or Luxembourgish, translations must be provided. Additionally, the applicant must demonstrate that the award is final and binding, ensuring that any applicable appeal periods have lapsed.
Upon successful recognition and declaration of enforceability, the award acquires the same legal standing as a final judgment issued by a Luxembourg court, thereby permitting its enforcement under Luxembourg law.
14 Grounds for challenging an award
01 What are the grounds on which an award can be challenged, appealed or otherwise set aside in Luxembourg?
In Luxembourg, the challenge, appeal, or setting aside of an arbitration award can be pursued through two primary avenues: the annulment and the revision.
For direct recourse against domestic award, the relevant legal framework is outlined in Article 1243 of the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC »), which provides for a recourse of revision under specific and very restrictive conditions. This application seeks the revocation of an arbitration award to allow for a new decision based on both the facts and the law. Such a review can be requested in the following very limited circumstances:
- Discovery of fraud by the party in whose favour the award was made, after the issuance of the decision;
- Recovery of crucial documents previously withheld by another party, subsequent to the award's issuance;
- If the decision was based on critical documents later acknowledged or judicially declared to be falsified;
- If the decision relied on attestations, testimonies, or oaths later recognized or judicially declared as false.
Only those parties directly involved in or represented during the initial arbitration proceedings are eligible to petition for a review. Such a petition must be filed within a two-month period following the date on which the party first became cognizant of the justifications for seeking a revision. The submission of this application mandates the compulsory summoning of all the parties involved in the revision process; failure to comply will result in the application being deemed inadmissible. Only parties who were part of or represented in the original arbitration can request such a review. This recourse must be filed within two months from the day the party became aware of the grounds for review. The application necessitates summoning all parties involved in the challenged award to the revision proceedings, under penalty of inadmissibility.
The application for review must be formally submitted to the Arbitral Tribunal. Should circumstances render the reconvening of the Tribunal impracticable, the appeal shall instead be directed to the Court of Appeal. In such instances, the appeal will be tried and judged according to the ordinary procedural rules applicable in the Court of Appeal in civil matters.
Should either the Arbitral Tribunal or the Court of Appeal deem the appeal warranted, it will proceed to render a decision on the merits of the dispute. Nonetheless, a review undertaken by the Court of Appeal shall not culminate in a verdict on the merits unless the constitution of a new arbitral tribunal is either declined by the parties or contested by one party on the premise that an arbitration agreement does not exist between them. In instances where the review is pertinent solely to a specific section of the award, and the remaining portions are contingent upon it, only that section will be subject to review. Furthermore, a party is precluded from requesting a review of an award that has previously been challenged in this manner, barring the emergence of new grounds subsequent to the original challenge.
In Luxembourg, a party may petition the state court for the annulment of domestic arbitration awards, invoking the legal framework provided by Article 1238 of the New Code of Civil Procedure (NCPC). This specific provision permits parties to appeal to the Court of Appeal, which deals with cases in civil matters. The appeal must be lodged within a one-month deadline from the award's notification, a period that is strictly enforced without regard to location. Importantly, filing an appeal does not stay the execution of the award. The Court of Appeal may annul the award on the following specific grounds:
- The arbitral tribunal incorrectly asserted or denied its jurisdiction;
- The arbitral tribunal was improperly constituted;
- The tribunal issued a ruling without adhering to the agreed-upon terms of its mission;
- The award contravenes the principles of public policy;
- The reasoning behind the award was not provided, except in cases where the parties waived the requirement for such explanations;
- There was a violation of the fundamental rights to a fair defense..
These provisions underscore the stringent criteria applied by Luxembourg courts in reviewing domestic arbitration awards, ensuring that the award is consistent with both key procedural fairness and Luxembourg's public policy standards.
02 Are parties permitted to exclude any rights of challenge or appeal?
Under Luxembourg law, parties are precluded from waiving or excluding their right to challenge or appeal an arbitration award. The rationale for this prohibition is rooted in the principle that the right to contest an award for violating public policy is integral to public interest and the right to a fair trial, rendering it inviolable and non-negotiable. Consequently, any contractual provision attempting to sidestep this fundamental principle is deemed null and void. Challenges or appeals against arbitration awards are permissible solely within the confines and through the mechanisms expressly delineated by the NCPC. Hence, any agreement designed to curtail the ambit of judicial scrutiny or to forsake the right to challenge or appeal an award is regarded as ineffective and legally unenforceable.
15 Confidentiality
01 Is arbitration seated in Luxembourg confidential? Is a duty of confidentiality found in the arbitration legislation?
In Luxembourg, arbitration proceedings are inherently confidential, as mandated by the arbitration legislation. Article 1231-5 the Nouveau Code de Procedure Civile (« NCPC ») explicitly provides for that, except as required by overriding legal obligations or as expressly agreed upon by the involved parties, the entirety of the arbitration process is to remain confidential. This confidentiality encompasses all elements related to the arbitration, including but not limited to the existence of the arbitration itself, the parties' submissions, and the final award, except where disclosure is mandated by law or is essential for the execution or enforcement of the award. However, the parties may elect to enhance the scope of confidentiality through explicit agreements within the arbitration contract or via a distinct accord. Despite the general adherence to confidentiality in Luxembourg's arbitration framework, exceptions exist. These include instances where judicial intervention necessitates the revelation of information during processes such as the annulment or enforcement of an award, or where disclosure is compelled by statutory requirements. Consequently, parties are advised to meticulously consider confidentiality provisions when formulating their arbitration agreements and to seek expert legal guidance where appropriate.
02 Are there any exceptions to confidentiality?
Yes, Luxembourg's arbitration legislation does include specific exceptions to the principle of confidentiality. Notably, parties involved in arbitration may mutually decide to relinquish confidentiality entirely or partially. Additionally, circumstances necessitating legal disclosure, such as for the enforcement or contestation of an award, also constitute exceptions.
Luxembourg SIF (specialised investment fund)
00 Set-up a SIF in Luxembourg - summary of the main features
SIF | |
---|---|
Practical use | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. |
Applicable legislation | Law of 13 February 2007 (“SIF Law”). |
Authorisation and supervision by the CSSF | Yes. |
Qualification as an AIF | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. |
Exemption from AIFMD full regime under lighter regime (AIFMD registration regime) | Possible. |
External authorised AIFM requirement | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. |
Eligible investors | Well-informed investors. |
Eligible assets | Unrestricted. |
Risk diversification requirements | Risk diversification requirements are defined by CSSF Circular n° 07/309. Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS and UCI. In particular, a SIF is not allowed to invest more than 30% of its net assets in securities of the same type issued by the same issuer. |
Legal Form | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. |
Umbrella structure | Yes. |
Capital requirements | EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. |
Required service providers | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. |
Possibility of listing | Yes. |
European passport | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. |
Net asset value (NAV) calculation and redemption frequency | At least once a year for reporting purposes. |
Overall income tax (corporate income tax and municipal business tax) | No income tax. |
Subscription tax (NAV: net asset value) | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Tax exemptions: certain money market and pension funds or SIFs investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. |
Wealth tax | No wealth tax. |
Withholding tax on dividends | Not subject to withholding tax. |
Benefit from Double Tax Treaty network | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. |
Benefit from the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive | No. |
Thin capitalization rules (debt-toequity ratio) | No debt-to-equity ratio. |
01 Introduction
The Specialised Investment Fund is a lightly regulated and tax-efficient regulatory regime aimed mainly but not exclusively at promoters and managers of alternative investment products including hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate and infrastructure funds, but also financial advisers and private investment managers, family offices and high net worth individuals. At the end of November 2023, 1,259 SIFs with total assets under management of approximately €714 bn were authorised by the Luxembourg regulator, the Financial Sector Supervisory Authority (CSSF).
The SIF regime was established in 2007 to offer fund promoters and managers an onshore, regulated alternative to traditional offshore fund jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and Bermuda when deciding on the jurisdiction in which to set up a fund and the type of fund vehicle to use.
The SIF regime offers broad flexibility in terms of eligible assets and investment strategy, as well as less restrictive rules on eligible investors than earlier regimes designed for institutional investors. SIFS may be created as investment companies with variable capital (SICAVs), investment companies with fixed capital (SICAFs) or contractual funds (FCPs), and take any legal form available under Luxembourg law.
SIFs that qualify as alternative investment funds and that are managed by an EU authorised AIFM benefit from the European passport allowing to market fund’s shares to professional investors. The Luxembourg law of 21 July 2021 which transposes Directive EU 2019/1160 on cross-border distribution of Collective investment schemes and the directly applicable cross border funds regulation (CBRD), aim to enhance the cross-border distribution of alternative investment funds by harmonising rules governing the launch and discontinuation of marketing, retail marketing and the content and supervisory review of marketing communications. It notably creates a new harmonised regulatory regime defining and implementing a notification process for pre-marketing of AIFs throughout the EU. Pre-marketing was not defined in the original AIFMD and was left to rules and guidance applicable in individual member states, leading to inconsistencies and uncertainty.
SIFS are also a privileged private wealth solution falling in this case outside of the scope of the AIFMD.
02 What is the background to the establishment of the SIF regime?
The implementation of the European Union’s UCITS III directive in Luxembourg through the
collective investment legislation on December 20, 2002, resulted in the replacement of the previous legal framework for collective investment undertakings, dating back to the law of March 30, 1988. This resulted in the need to create a new regulatory framework for funds aimed at institutional and other sophisticated investors before the expiry of a transition period in February 2007.
The legislation of February 13, 2007, introduced a new investment vehicle to Luxembourg in the
Specialised Investment Fund, providing a more flexible framework than the previous regime for
institutional funds under Part II of the December 2002 legislation, as well as broadening the potential investor base.
The SIF legislation was amended just over five years later by the law of March 26, 2012, adapting the regime to European and international developments regarding regulation and transparency of alternative investments, including the EU’s Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers, in areas including delegation, risk management and the handling of actual or potential conflicts of interest.
The revisions also aligned the SIF rules in some areas with the UCITS IV directive and the Luxembourg legislation of December 17, 2010 transposing it into national law. The SIF regime was also modified in some areas by the law of July 12, 2013 adopting the AIFMD directive in
Luxembourg.
The SIF legislation was amended on 21 July 2023 to facilitate retail investors access and providing a more consistent and practical approach.
03 Who may invest in a SIF?
The SIF legislation offers a broader scope of application regarding investor eligibility than the 1991 law on institutional funds that it replaced, replacing the notion of institutional investors with that of well-informed investors.
A well-informed investor is defined as:
• Any institutional investor;
• Any professional investor; or
• Any other investor that confirms in writing that they are a well-informed investor and either invests a minimum of €100,000 in the SIF or is certified by a credit institution, investment firm, management company (as defined by EU directives), or an authorized AIFM as possessing expertise, experience and knowledge to conduct an adequate appraisal of an investment in the SIF. These restrictions do not apply to directors and other individuals involved in management of the SIF.
The SIF Law, therefore, extends access to these funds beyond institutional and professional investors to other investors capable of taking an informed decision to accept a lower level of protection than that offered to retail investors through their status, wealth, experience or understanding of the risks investment in a SIF can entail.
04 What are the authorisation requirements for a SIF?
SIFs must receive approval from the regulator before they can be launched, based on approval of its constitutional documents, of its managers or directors, and of its choice of depositary bank.
Managers and directors (who do not need to be Luxembourg residents) must be able to demonstrate their professional qualifications and experience, good standing and reputation. However, there is no requirement for approval of the promoter – indeed, there is no requirement for a promoter at all.
There is no requirement either for approval of the investment manager, but the CSSF does require notification of the persons responsible for management of the SIF’s investment portfolio, so that the regulator can ensure they are of good reputation and have the experience necessary to manage the type of alternative investment strategy followed by the SIF. The investment manager shall be regulated in its home jurisdiction and there shall be a memorandum of understanding signed between Luxembourg and the relevant third country. Any changes in the identity of the fund’s portfolio managers must also be reported to the regulator.
The CSSF’s approval is required for any substantive change made to the SIF’s offering documents, such as the name of the AIFM fund or sub-funds, the replacement of the custodian, administrator, auditor or investment manager, the creation of new sub-funds or a significant change to its investment policy. The regulator may withdraw authorisation for one or more sub-funds of a SIF while maintaining the authorisation for other sub-funds within the same structure.
The 2012 amendments to the legislation stipulate that the activity of management of a SIF must comprise at a minimum management of the investment portfolio. This excludes from the SIF regime passive funds that seek to create value solely by the long-term holding of assets and to create a distinction between SIFs and private wealth management companies governed by Luxembourg’s law of May 11, 2007, but not private equity or real estate funds.
05 What are a SIF’s servicing requirements?
A Luxembourg depositary bank, administrator and auditor must be appointed. The depositary bank only needs to know at any time of how the assets of the SIF are invested and where, and how the assets are available. Unlike with other Luxembourg funds, the depositary (unless the SIF is managed by an authorised alternative investment fund manager and is subject to the full scope of the country’s AIFM legislation) does not have to monitor that the sale, issue, redemption and cancellation of shares or units are carried out in accordance with the law and the articles of incorporation, or that the fund’s income is allocated in accordance with the management regulations or the articles of association.
06 What investments may a SIF undertake?
The SIF regime offers a broad scope of eligible assets; any type of asset can be held by a SIF and any type of investment strategy can be pursued. Assets may include equities, bonds, derivatives, structured products, real estate and shareholdings in unlisted companies. There are no leverage restrictions.
The approach to risk spreading is more flexible than for other types of investment scheme, under regulatory guidelines set out in CSSF Circular 07/309 of August 3, 2007, which states that in principle, a SIF may not invest more than 30% of its assets or commitments in securities of the same type issued by the same issuer, subject to certain exceptions. Equally, in principle, short sales may not result in the SIF holding a short position in securities of the same type from the same issuer representing more than 30% of its assets.
This restriction does not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by an OECD member state or its regional or local authorities, or by EU, regional or global supranational institutions and bodies, nor to investment in other funds subject to risk-spreading requirements at least comparable with those applicable to SIFs. Each sub-fund of an umbrella structure is considered as a separate issuer as long as the liabilities of individual sub-funds toward third parties are segregated.
The SIF must ensure a similar level of risk-spreading when investing through derivatives via appropriate diversification of the underlying assets. The counterparty risk in an OTC derivative transaction must, where applicable, be limited with regard to the quality and qualification of the counterparty.
In principle, these guidelines apply to all SIFs. The CSSF may grant exemptions where justified, although in practice it does not permit a higher level of concentration than 40%. In certain cases, the regulator may require the SIF to comply with additional investment restrictions.
The revised SIF law follows the 2010 fund legislation in allowing one sub-fund of a SIF to invest in another, clarifying that the rules set out in Luxembourg’s 1915 company law regarding a company’s investment in its own shares do not apply to SIFs. Sub-funds of the same SIF may not cross-invest in each other, and voting rights of shares held by one sub-fund in another are suspended.
Furthermore, the CSSF clarified in its FAQ on virtual assets (UCIs) that an AIF with an authorised AIFM may invest in virtual assets directly or indirectly as long as the fund’s shares or units are marketed only to professional investors, and the AIFM obtains an extension of authorisation from the CSSF for the new investment strategy.
07 What legal forms may a SIF adopt?
A SIF can be created in different forms, notably as a contractual fund (fonds commun de placement or FCP), an investment company with variable capital (société d’investissement à capital variable or SICAV) or an investment company with fixed capital (société d’investissement à capital fixe or SICAF). The FCP has no legal personality and must be managed by a management company, while a SICAV or SICAF can be either self-managed or have an external management company.
A SICAV or SICAF may adopt most of the corporate and partnership forms available in Luxembourg, including public limited liability company (société anonyme or S.A.), private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée or S.àr.l.), corporate partnership limited by shares (société en commandite par actions or S.C.A.), common limited partnership (société en commandite simple or SCS), special limited partnership (société en commandite spéciale of SCSp), or co-operative company organised as a public limited liability company (société coopérative organisée comme une société anonyme or SCoSA).
This flexibility of form and structure means, for example, that a private equity fund can be established with a structure and attributes familiar to managers and investors familiar with the Anglo-Saxon limited partnership model.
08 Can SIFs have multiple sub-funds?
These entities may be set up as a single fund or as an umbrella fund with multiple sub-funds, each with a different investment policy, if this is authorised by the SIF’s constitutional documents, denominated in different currencies, available to different types of investors or subject to different liquidity rules. A fund or sub-funds may have an unlimited number of share classes, according to the needs of the promoter or investors.
Unless otherwise provided for in the SIF’s constitutional documents, sub-funds within an umbrella fund are governed by the principle of compartment segregation, which means that each sub-fund is treated as a separate entity making distinct transactions, and the rights of creditors are applicable only to the particular sub-fund incurring the liabilities in question.
09 What corporate rules apply to a SIF?
The SIF legislation sets a minimum capital requirement of €1.25m, which must be reached within 24 months following authorisation by the CSSF, compared with 12 months for other funds governed by the 2010 fund legislation. An S.A. must have a minimum capital of €30,000 on incorporation and an S.àr.l €12,000.
At least 5% of the value of each share must be paid up, in cash or in kind, upon subscription. SIFs do not have to comply with any debt/equity ratio, nor are they subject to issue, redemption or distribution restrictions, but the net assets or capital may not fall below €1.25m.
10 How to handle the risk management, conflicts of interest and the delegation in a SIF?
The revised law requires SIFs to put in place systems to monitor, measure and manage the investment risk of its individual positions and their contribution to the portfolio’s overall risk profile. They must also be structured and organised to minimise the risk of conflicts of interest that could arise between the SIF and any person involved in its business activity, or linked to it directly or indirectly, that could have a negative impact on investors’ interests; procedures must be drawn up to manage such conflicts as do arise.
The delegation of tasks and functions to third-party providers will not affect regulation of the fund. As a rule, external providers of portfolio management services to the SIF must be approved for that function and subject to prudential regulation, although the CSSF may grant exemptions to this requirement.
The board of directors of the SIF must be able to ensure that the delegated provider is qualified and capable and must retain ultimate control over the fund’s activities. Delegation should not create conflicts of interest – investment management may not be delegated to the fund’s custodian, for instance – and the delegation of functions must be made clear in the fund’s offering documents.
11 What taxation is a SIF subject to?
SIF promoters have a choice between a tax-transparent SIF, set up in the form of an FCP, or a non-tax transparent SIF, set up in the form of a SICAV or SICAF. SIFs are subject to an annual subscription tax (taxe d’abonnement) of 0.01% on their net asset value, calculated at the end of each quarter, compared with a rate of up to 0.05% for other types of fund. The tax does not apply to SIFs investing in other funds that are subject to the subscription tax, that invest only in money-market instruments, or that are pension pooling schemes.
They are not subject to corporate income tax nor net worth tax in Luxembourg, and they enjoy an exemption from VAT on management fees. Non-resident SIF investors are not subject to Luxembourg capital gains tax; distributions are generally exempt from withholding tax.
SIFs may enjoy access to the benefits of certain double taxation avoidance treaties signed by Luxembourg that cover investment companies with fixed or variable capital.
Furthermore, the Luxembourg law of 19 December 2020, provided for a reduction in subscription tax by progressively reducing the tax from the standard rate of 0.05% of assets to just 0.01% for funds in which at least 50% of assets are classified as sustainable.
12 With what documentations and reporting requirements must a SIF comply with?
The SIF must issue an offering document and an audited annual report. The offering document, which may be a private placement memorandum, offering memorandum or prospectus, is not subject to minimum content requirements, but it must include all information necessary to enable investors to make an informed judgment about the proposed investment and in particular its risks. It is recommended that the offering document meet all legal requirements imposed on prospectuses.
SIFs are exempt from the obligation to consolidate their accounting. Valuation of the assets is based on fair value. There is no obligation to publish a half-yearly report, only an annual one, which must be provided to investors and the CSSF within six months of the end of the period to which it relates. A SIF does not have to publish its net asset value.
13 What is the practical use of a SIF ?
As result of its flexibility, the SIF offers the possibility to be used to structure a hedge fund, private equity fund, venture capital fund, real estate fund, infrastructure fund, distressed debt fund, Islamic finance fund, socially responsible investment fund, tangible assets fund, and any other type of alternative fund. SIFs are also a good vehicle for private wealth management.
14 Conclusion
The SIF legislation offers a regime for the establishment of onshore, regulated alternative funds that has been tried, tested and refined over more than seventeen years, and that is now aligned with the requirements for regulation of alternative managers, and, indirectly their funds, under the AIFM Directive as of July 22, 2013.
SIFs can also benefit from the EuVECA, EuSEF and ELTIF regime.
With the broad flexibility available to promoters regarding the fund’s investment policy and the range of qualifying options opening up a wide investor base, the SIF offers a well-established vehicle for promoters targeting European institutions and individuals while offering investors sound and effective oversight.
15 How can we assist you ?
Our investment management team:
- Helps you find the most suitable investment vehicle to meet your requirements and your goals from a marketing, regulatory, legal and tax perspective.
- Introduces you to suitable service providers to meet your requirements, namely custodian bank, AIFM, administration agent, registrar and transfer agent, and auditor.
- Provides assistance with the establishment of the fund, including drafting of the private placement memorandum, assistance with the incorporation of the fund and its general partner, and regulatory filings with the CSSF.
- Assists with the conversion of offshore funds into SIFs.
- Provides corporate support services throughout the lifetime of the fund, including amendment of fund documentation, restructuring, or launching and closing of sub-funds.
- Provides help with changes of service providers including the custodian bank, fund administrator, auditor or registrar and transfer agent.
- Assists with the listing of the fund’s shares or units on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated or EURO MTF market.
- Provides support with the registration of the fund in other jurisdictions, in co-operation with local service providers.
- Provides advice on AIFMD-related issues.
- Provides advice to fund promoters on local private placement rules for marketing their funds in Luxembourg.
- Keeps you up to date on the latest legal and regulatory developments,
For further information, please contact Olivier Sciales at oliviersciales@cs-avocats.lu
16 Compare Luxembourg vehicles
Compare two vehicles:
UCITS | Part II UCI | ELTIF | SIF | SICAR | RAIF | SPF | Securitisation vehicle | Unregulated SCS/SCSp | Ordinary Luxembourg company | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practical use | Highly regulated vehicle which can be sold through a EU passport to all types of investors (such as retail investors, professional investors, institutional investors). | Investment funds which could be used for investment strategies that do not meet the criteria set by the UCITS directives. | EU marketing label for long-term investment funds, private equity funds, infrastructure funds, debt funds, funds of funds, sustainable finance, debt funds, co-investments, securitisation, debt funds, investments in fintechs, real assets. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Private equity and venture capital transactions. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Individuals wishing to optimise their personal tax planning (private wealth management purposes). | • True sale and synthetic securitisations. • Securitisation of a portfolio of securities. • Securitisation as structure for intra group financing activities. • Securitisation of non-performing loans. • Securitisation of leasing receivables. • Securitisation of both tangible and intangible assets. • CLOs (possibility of active management). | Private equity, venture capital and real estate investments and any other alternative investments. | Holding and financing activity, commercial activity, holding of IP, etc. |
Applicable legislation | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part I (“UCITS Law”). | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part II (“UCI Law”). | Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds (“ELTIF Regulation”). The ELTIF Regulation has been amended on 15 March 2023 with significant changes which favour the fund market participants, fund financing and investors, in particular, the process of retailization and the amendments will apply from 10 January 2024. The ELTIF column has been drafted according to the amended ELTIF Regulation ("ELTIF 2 Regulation"). | Law of 13 February 2007 (“SIF Law”). | Law of 15 June 2004 (“SICAR Law”). | Law of 23 July 2016 (“RAIF Law”). | Law of 11 May 2007 (“SPF Law”). | Law of 22 March 2004 (“Securitisation Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). |
Authorisation and supervision by the CSSF | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Non. | Non. | No, unless issue on a continuous basis of financial instruments offered to the public. The securitisation vehicle issues on a continuous basis when it carries out more than three issuances of financial instruments offered to the public during the financial year. All the issuances by the compartments should be added up. The issuance of financial instruments is offered to the public when it is not intended for professional clients, the denominations are less than 100,000 euros and it is not distributed as private placement. | Non. | Non. |
Qualification as an AIF | No. | Always an AIF. | Always an AIF. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Always an AIF. | In principle, no (as it would not be considered as “raising” capital from a number of investors as the structure generally serves for the investment of the private wealth of a “pre-existing group” (as defined in the Esma guidelines on key concepts of the AIFMD)). | No, in case • such vehicle meets the definition of “securitisation special purpose vehicle ” under the AIFM Law; • it issues collateralised debt obligations; • it only issues debt instruments; • such entity is not managed according to an investment policy within the meaning of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. |
Exemption from AIFMD full regime under lighter regime (AIFMD registration regime) | Not applicable. | Possible. | No. | Possible. | Possible. | No. | Not applicable. | Possible. | Possible. | Possible. |
External authorised AIFM requirement | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed. Always an authorised EU AIFM. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Always required. | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. |
Eligible investors | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Restricted to: • natural persons acting in the context of the management of their personal wealth; • management entities acting solely in the interest of the private wealth (e.g. trusts, private foundations); and intermediaries acting for the account of the above mentioned eligible investors (e.g. bank acting under a fiduciary agreement). | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Eligible assets | Restricted to transferable securities admitted or dealt on a regulated market, investment funds, financial derivative instruments, cash and money market instruments that are in compliance with article 41 of the Ucits law and the relevant EU directives and regulations. Please note that the eligibility of the asset must be ascertained on a case-by-case basis in view of the applicable laws and regulatory practice. | Unrestricted. The investment objective and strategy of the fund is subject to the prior approval of the CSSF. | Restricted to: - equity or quasi-equity instruments and debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking; -loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking with a maturity that does not exceed the life of the ELTIF, - units or shares of one or several other ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM provided that those ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs¸ UCITS and EU AIFs invest in eligible investments (this wording) and have not themselves invested more than 10% of their assets in any other UCI; - real assets; - certain STS securitisations (where the underlying exposures are residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial loans backed by mortgages on commercial immovable property, credit facilities, trade receivables and other underlying exposures; provided that, for the two last ones, the proceeds from the securitisation bonds are used for financing or refinancing long-term investments), - EU Green Bonds issued by a qualifying portfolio, and UCITS eligible assets. Qualifying portfolio undertaking is an undertaking that fulfils, at the time of the initial investment, the following requirements: - it is not a financial undertaking undertaking, unless it is a financial undertaking, other than a financial holding company or a mixed-activity holding company, that has been authorized or registered more recently than 5 years before the date of the investment (fintechs); - is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility; or is admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility and has a market capitalisation of no more than EUR 1 500 000 000; - it is established in a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country is not identified as high-risk third and is not mentioned in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax prusposes. ELTIFs are not allowed to: - short sell - take direct or indirect exposure to commodities; - enter into securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase transactions, or any other agreement which has an equivalent economic effect and poses similar risks, if more than 10 % of the assets of the ELTIF are affected; - use financial derivative instruments, except where the use of such instruments solely serves the purpose of hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF. | Unrestricted. | Restricted to investments in securities representing risk capital. According to the CSSF Circular 06/241, investment in risk capital is to be understood as the direct or indirect contribution of assets to entities in view of their launch, their development or their listing on a stock exchange. The SICAR is not allowed to invest directly in real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted, unless it invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a Sicar). | Restricted to acquisition, detention, management and realisation of financial assets. The SPF is not allowed to carry out commercial activities or to hold directly real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted. The securitisation vehicle may acquire or assume, directly or through another undertaking, risks relating to claims, other assets, or obligations assumed by third parties or inherent to all or part of the activities of third parties and issues financial instruments or contracts, for all or part of it, any type of loan, whose value or yield depends on such risks. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Risk diversification requirements | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 42 et seq. of the UCITS Law, e.g. (not exhaustive): • a UCITS may not invest more than 10% of its assets in transferable securities or money market instruments issued by the same body; • a UCITS may not invest more than 20% of its net assets in deposits made with the same body; • the global exposure relating to derivative instruments does not exceed the total net value of the UCITS portfolio. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by IML Circular 91/75 (as amended by CSSF Circular n° 05/177). Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS. In particular, a UCI is not allowed to invest more than 20% of its net assets in securities issued by any one issuer. Specific restrictions concerning funds adopting an alternative investment strategy are contained in CSSF Circular n° 02/80. | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 13 and 17 of the ELITF Regulation (not exhaustive): ELTIFs marketed to retail investors shall not invest more than: - 20 % of its capital in instruments issued by, or loans granted to, any single qualifying portfolio undertaking; - 20 % of its capital in a single real asset; - 20 % of its capital in units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS, or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM; - 10 % of its capital in UCITS (liquid) assets where those assets have been issued by any single body; or 25 % where bonds are issued by a credit institution which has its registered office in a Member State and is subject by law to special public supervision designed to protect bond-holders; - The aggregate value of STS Securitisations in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 20% of the value of the capital of the ELTIF; - The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by CSSF Circular n° 07/309. Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS and UCI. In particular, a SIF is not allowed to invest more than 30% of its net assets in securities of the same type issued by the same issuer. | No risk diversification requirements. | Risk diversification requirements are aligned with those applicable to SIFs, unless the RAIF chooses to invest in risk capital only and such choice is mentioned in its constitutive documents. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. |
Legal Form | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA,SCA) All of these entities must be open-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP, SICAV and SICAF in various legal forms, Soparfis, SCS, SCSp, SCA and future forms entitling an AIF to be authorized as an ELTIF. In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCS • SCSp • SCoSA The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCSA | A securitisation vehicle may be set up in one of the following forms: • a securitisation company (SA, Sàrl, SCS, SCSp, SENC, SCA, SAS, SCSA); or • a securitisation fund consisting of one or several co-ownerships or one or several fiduciary estates and managed by a management company. | • SCS • SCSp | • SA, Sàrl, SCA • SAS • SCoSA • SCS • SCSp |
Umbrella structure | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. Application for authorisation as ELTIF of one or more compartments may be submitted | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | No. | Yes. | No. | No. |
Capital requirements | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 6 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 6 months following its authorisation. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 12 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 12 months following its authorisation. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the capital requirements applicable to an ELTIF are the capital requirements applicable to fund, in particular due to the national product law. | EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. | EUR 1,000,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the auhorisation by the CSSF. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the entry into force of the management regulations. • SICAV: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the incorporation of the SICAV. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 • SCSA: no minimum capital. | If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a company, it depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a fund, there is no minimum capital requirement. | No minimum capital requirement. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 No minimum capital requirement for other legal forms. |
Required service providers | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • As ELTIF is an EU label, the required service providers for an ELTIF depend on the applicable national product law. • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. However, if the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, the Depositary shall comply with the UCITS depositary requirements and be a Depositary institution • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Other service providers required by the relevant product rules. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | Registered auditor in principle not required unless two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. | • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the securitisation vehicle qualifies as an AIF). • Management company (if the securitisation vehicle is set up in the form of a fund). • Independent auditor. • No depository institution (unless for regulated securisation vehicles). • No administrative agent. | For SCS: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCS qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCS qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). For SCSp: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). | Registered auditor in principle not required unless the company is an AIF managed by an AIFM with AUM above the threshold or two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. On 28 July 2023, draft bill 8286 (the Draft Bill) was released, aiming to overhaul Luxembourg accounting law applicable to undertakings (the New Law). It is expected to be adopted in 2025. |
Possibility of listing | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes, but difficult in practice. | Yes. | No. | No. | In principle, no. The SCS/SCSp may however issue debt securities that are eligible to be listed on the stock exchange. | Yes. |
European passport | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. |
Net asset value (NAV) calculation and redemption frequency | The UCITS must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least twice a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. As ELTIF is an EU label, the NAV computation and redemption frequency depend on applicable national product law and the AIFM law. At least once a year for reporting purposes. Redemption frequency: In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF; - redemptions are limited to a percentage of the UCITS (liquid) assets of the ELTIF. An ELTIF may offer, under certain conditions, early redemption rights to its investors according to the ELTIF's investment strategy. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. |
Overall income tax (corporate income tax and municipal business tax) | No income tax. | No income tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate: 23.87%. In certain cases, reduced corporate income tax rates may apply. Income derived from transferable securities (e.g. dividends received and capital gains realised on the sale of shares) is exempt. Income on cash held for the purpose of a future investment is also exempt (for one year). | No income tax, unless investing only in risk capital, then SICAR tax regime applicable. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate for taxable securisation companies: 23.87%. Securitisation vehicles should be able to deduct from their gross profits their operational costs and the dividends or interests distributed to the shareholders/creditors. Therefore securitisation companies should not generate significant taxable profits and should therefore to a large extent be tax neutral. | No corporate income tax applicable. Municipal business tax of 6.75% applicable in very limited circumstances, namely in case the SCS/SCSp (i) carries out a commercial activity or (ii) is deemed to carry out a commercial activity. A SCS/SCSp is deemed to carry out a commercial activity if its general partner is a Luxembourg public or private limited liability company holding at least 5% of the partnership interests. With a proper structuring of the GPs partnership interest it should be possible to avoid the deemed commercial characterisation of the SCS/SCSp. | General aggregate rate: 23.87%, but 100% exemption for dividends, liquidation proceeds and capital gains from qualifying participations. |
Subscription tax (NAV: net asset value) | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Tax exemptions: certain money market and pension funds or SIFs investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Exemptions apply. | Annual subscription tax of 0.25% on the amount of paid up capital and issue premium (if any). | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. |
Wealth tax | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | 0.5% on a taxable base of up to EUR 500 million. As of 1 January 2025, there is progressionve net wealth tax based solely on the company's total balance sheet size, regardless of asset composition: • €535 for companies with a total balance sheet up to and including €350,000 • €1,605 for companies with a total balance sheet between €350,001 and €2,000,000 • €4,815 for companies with a total balance sheet exceeding €2,000,000 |
Withholding tax on dividends | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Dividends distributed by a Luxembourg company are in principle subject to withholding tax at a rate of 15%, unless a domestic law exemption or a lower tax treaty rate applies. |
Benefit from Double Tax Treaty network | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | Yes in case the SICAR is set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). | • RAIFs investing in a portfolfio of risk capital (such as a SICAR) Access if set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). • RAIFs not investing in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR), but set-up as: SICAV / SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | No. | Yes for securitisation companies. | No. | Yes. |
Benefit from the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive | No. | No. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No. | In principle yes, but certain jurisdictions where the target companies are located may challenge the application of the directive. | No, unless RAIF that invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR). | No. | Yes. | No. | Yes. |
Thin capitalization rules (debt-toequity ratio) | Borrowings of up to 10% of net assets to finance redemptions (it should be a short term borrowing and cannot be for investment purposes) or to buy real estate for its business. The total borrowing under the above may not exceed 15% of net assets. | Borrowings of up to 25% of net assets without any restrictions are allowed. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the debt-to-equity ratio depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. Borrowings of cash of up to 50% of the NAV of the ELTIF marketed to retail investors and up to 100% for the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | Tax of 0.25% on the debt that exceeds 8 times the paid-up capital increased by the issue premium. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No provision in Luxembourg law. However, there is a specific administrative practice. |
Luxembourg EuVECA Managers and Luxembourg EuVECA Funds (European Venture Capital Funds)
01 Introduction
On 17 April 2013, the EU published Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 on European venture capital funds to facilitate the financing and marketing of VC funds within the EU, aiming to streamline the financing of the internal market. Venture capital provides finance to companies that are typically quite small, in the initial stages of their corporate existence, and demonstrate strong potential for growth and expansion. VC funds also contribute to the development of such companies with their valuable expertise and knowledge, business contacts, brand equity, and strategic advice. By providing an EU VC label based on EU harmonised requirements, the EU aims to stimulate economic growth, job creation, and capital mobilisation, foster the establishment and expansion of innovative undertakings, increase investments in research, and promote entrepreneurship, innovation, and competitiveness in the internal market.
The EuVECA Regulation was amended in 2018, 2021, and 2023 regarding the management of EuVECA Funds by authorised AIFMs, cross-border distributions, and pre-marketing, as well as the accessability of information on the European single access point. Any references to the EuVECA Regulation should be understood as references to the EuVECA Regulation as amended from time to time.
This publication focuses on EUVECA Managers and EUVECA Funds, particularly Luxembourg registered AIFMs qualifying as EUVECA Managers managing Luxembourg EUVECA Funds. In this context, the CSSF is the competent authority of the EUVECA Managers and the EUVECA Funds. Luxembourg is indeed a competitive and efficient business location due to its flexibility, diversity, and broad range of services, skills, investors, and managers.
The EUVECA Regulation provides a product marketing passport to EUVECA Funds. This means that EU alternative investment funds (AIFs) fulfilling the requirements of the EUVECA Regulation can use the EUVECA label, an EU-regulated label, for marketing purposes. As a result, EUVECA Funds managed by a Luxembourg-registered AIFM can attract capital more quickly thanks to the marketing passport.
A key advantage of the EUVECA Regulation is the marketing passport of an AIF managed by a registered AIFM.
The EUVECA Regulation has EEA relevance, meaning that all references to the EU in this publication should be understood as references to the EEA.
02 Key features
- Eligibility for the ‘EUVECA’ label;
- Management by an EU-registered or EU-authorized AIFM of an EU AIF;
- Access to a marketing passport (which is broader than the marketing passport under the AIFMD);
- No obligation for appointment of a depositary if the EUVECA Manager is a registered AIFM;
- Potential for either an external or internal EUVECA Manager;
- Requirement that 70% of the EU AIF’s capital be invested in qualifying investments.
In general, it is important to note that the EUVECA regime permits an AIF, managed by either a registered or an authorized AIFM, to use the EUVECA label for marketing and capital-raising purposes. The EUVECA Regulation acts as a supplementary layer of regulation, requiring the AIFM and the relevant AIF to comply with its provisions, the relevant implementing AIFM laws and regulations, and any other
product-level requirements. EUVECA Funds and their managers must continually comply with the EUVECA Regulation and the applicable provisions of the AIFMD.
The EUVECA label is recognised and valid in all Member States.
03 What changes does the EUVECA regulation bring to fund structuring options?
The EUVECA Regulation provides an EU label and grants an EU marketing passport for EUVECA Funds managed by either an EU-registered AIFM or an EU-authorised AIFM. As such, the marketing passport introduces a structuring option for the marketing of EUVECA Funds managed by EU-registered AIFMs, an opportunity that did not exist before the implementation of the EUVECA Regulation. Also, the EUVECA Regulation allows EUVECA Funds to be passported without the necessity of a depositary, sidestepping one of the significant conditions imposed for passporting an EU AIF under the AIFMD.
04 What is the scope of the EUVECA Regulation?
The EUVECA Regulation may apply to all registered AIFMs in accordance with Article 3 of the AIFMD, as well as all authorised AIFMs in accordance with Chapter II of the AIFMD. However, not all the provisions of the EUVECA Regulation apply to authorised AIFMs. This is to avoid inconsistencies with the provisions of the AIFMD they must already comply with to be authorised as AIFMs. In this context, it is important to highlight that the following explanations, relating to the general principles, the delegations, the conflicts of interests, the own funds, and valuation requirements, apply specifically to registered AIFMs. They do not apply to authorised AIFMs, which are already subject to either comparable or more rigorous requirements under the AIFMD.
External EUVECA Managers who are registered on the list of EUVECA Managers may additionally manage UCITS, subject to authorisation under the UCITSD.
05 What is a EUVECA fund?
A EUVECA Fund is a UCI that:
(i) intends to invest at least 70 % of its aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital in assets that are qualifying investments (see the definition below), calculated on the basis of amounts investible after deduction of all relevant costs and holdings in cash and cash equivalents, within a time frame laid down in its rules or instruments of incorporation;
(ii) does not use more than 30 % of its aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital for the acquisition of assets other than qualifying investments, calculated on the basis of amounts investible after deduction of all relevant costs and holdings in cash and cash equivalents;
(iii) is established within the EU, meaning a EUVECA Fund shall be an EU AIF.
06 What are the qualifying investments of EUVECA funds?
The qualifying investments of EuVECA Funds are the following:
(i) equity or quasi-equity instruments that are issued by:
- a qualifying portfolio undertaking (see definition below) and acquired directly by the EuVECA Fund from the qualifying portfolio undertaking;
- a qualifying portfolio undertaking in exchange for equity security issued by the qualifying portfolio undertaking, or
- an undertaking of which the qualifying portfolio undertaking is a majority-owned subsidiary and which is acquired by the EuVECA Fund in exchange for an equity instrument issued by the qualifying portfolio undertaking;
(ii) secured or unsecured loans granted by the EuVECA Fund to a qualifying portfolio undertaking in which the EuVECA Fund already holds qualifying investments, provided that no more than 30 % of the aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital in the EuVECA Fund is used for such loans;
(iii) shares of a qualifying portfolio undertaking acquired from existing shareholders of that undertaking;
(iv) units or shares of one or several other qualifying venture capital funds, provided that those qualifying venture capital funds have not themselves invested more than 10 % of their aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital in qualifying venture capital funds. Therefore, the structuring of EuVECA Funds of EuVECA Funds is possible. Attention should be drawn to the fact that ESMA has clarified that this point (iv) shall be understood as authorizing EuVECA Funds to invest in EU AIFs that are not yet registered as EuVECA Funds but which materially comply with the criteria of the definition of qualifying venture capital funds (see definition of EuVECA Funds above) and the 10% limit of such point (iv).
07 What are the qualifying portfolio undertakings of EUVECA funds?
The qualifying portfolio undertaking of a EuVECA Fund is an undertaking that:
(i) at the time of the first investment by the EuVECA Fund in that undertaking complies with one of the following conditions:
- the undertaking is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or an MTF, and employs up to 499 persons;
- the undertaking is an SME which is listed on an SME Growth Market;
(ii) is not itself a UCI;
(iii) is not one or more of the following:
- a credit institution;
- an investment firm;
- an insurance undertaking;
- a financial holding company; or
- a mixed-activity holding company.
(iv) is established within the territory of a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country:
- is not listed as a Non-Cooperative Country and Territory by the FATF on AML/CFT; and
- has signed an agreement with Luxembourg and with each other Member State in which the units or shares of the EuVECA Fund are intended to be marketed to ensure that the third country fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters, including any multilateral tax agreements.
08 Are there pre-marketing rules applicable to the EUVECA manager?
Yes. Pre-marketing is the provision of information or communication, direct or indirect, on investment strategies or investment ideas by a EuVECA Manager, or on its behalf, to potential investors domiciled in the EU in order to test their interest in a EuVECA Fund either not established or established but not yet notified to the CSSF, in that Member State where the potential investors are domiciled. Pre-marketing does not occur when there is no offer or placement to the potential investor to invest in the units or shares of the EuVECA Fund.
Similarly, it is not considered pre-marketing when the information shared with potential investors is sufficient for them to commit to the units or shares of a EUVECA Fund, or if the information includes subscription forms or similar documents, or final-form constitutional documents, prospectus or offering documents of a yet-to-be-established EUVECA Fund.
When a EUVECA Manager performs pre-marketing of the shares or units of the EUVECA Fund, the draft prospectus or offering document given to the investors should not provide sufficient information for investors to make an investment decision. It shall clearly state that:
- they do not constitute an offer or an invitation to subscribe to units or shares of a EUVECA Fund; and
- the information presented should not be relied upon as it is incomplete and subject to change.
A EUVECA Manager must also adhere to the following rules:
Investors do not acquire units or shares in a EUVECA Fund through pre-marketing. The investors contacted as part of pre-marketing can only acquire units or shares in that EUVECA Fund through marketing, not pre-marketing.
Any subscription by professional investors, within 18 months of the EUVECA Manager initiating pre-marketing, to units or shares of a EUVECA Fund referred to in pre-marketing documentation, or of a EUVECA established as a result of the pre-marketing, is considered as resulting from marketing. Therefore, the EUVECA Manager must comply with the applicable notification procedures outlined in the EUVECA Regulation (see below).
Within two weeks of starting pre-marketing, a EUVECA Manager must send an informal letter, either in paper form or electronically, to the CSSF. This letter must specify the Member States where and the periods during which pre-marketing has been or is being conducted. It should include a brief description of the pre-marketing including information on the presented investment strategies, and where relevant, a list of the EUVECA Funds that are or were the subject of pre-marketing.
The CSSF then promptly informs the competent authorities of the Member States where the EUVECA Manager has been or is currently engaged in pre-marketing. The competent authorities of the Member State where pre-marketing has been or is being conducted may request the CSSF to provide additional information about the pre-marketing taking place within its territory. For instance, in a scenario where a Luxembourg EUVECA Manager is pre-marketing a Luxembourg EUVECA Fund in Germany, BaFin (the German Financial Supervisory Authority) may request additional information from the CSSF about the pre-marketing activities conducted in Germany.
A third party, if authorized as an investment firm, credit institution, UCITS management company, an AIFM, or acts as a tied agent, may engage in pre-marketing on behalf of an authorised EUVECA Manager. Such a third party must comply with all obligations outlined in this section.
Attention should be paid to the fact that while these rules may seem stringent, the EUVECA Manager does not need to provide information about the content or the recipients of pre-marketing nor comply with any other conditions imposed by a Member State before engaging in pre-marketing. For the sake of clarity, this means that Member States cannot impose further restrictions on pre-marketing conducted by a EUVECA in their territory.
09 What are the rules relating to the 30% limit on non-qualifying investments, as well as those on leverage and borrowing?
When acquiring assets other than qualifying investments, no more than 30 % of the fund’s aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital may be used for the acquisition of such assets. The 30 % threshold should be calculated based on amounts that can be invested after deducting all relevant costs. Holdings in cash and cash equivalents are not included when calculating this threshold, as they are not considered investments.
EUVECA Managers should not employ any method at the level of the EuVECA Fund that increases the exposure of the fund beyond the level of its committed capital. This includes borrowing cash or securities, engaging in derivative positions, or any other means.
Consequently, the EUVECA Managers are only permitted to borrow, issue debt obligations, or provide guarantees at the level of the EUVECA Fund when such borrowings, debt obligations, or guarantees are covered by uncalled commitments.
10 To whom may EUVECA managers market the shares or units of EUVECA funds?
EUVECA Managers may market the shares or units of EuVECA Funds exclusively to investors deemed professional clients either by nature or upon request, in accordance with Annex II of MiFID, or to other investors who meet the following criteria:
- They commit to investing a minimum of EUR 100,000; and
- They state in writing, in a document separate from the commitment agreement their awareness of the risks associated with the proposed commitment or investment.
It should be noted that executives, directors, or employees involved in the management of a EUVECA Manager are not required to qualify as professional investors under MiFID when investing in the EUVECA Fund they manage.
11 What are the applicable rules regarding preferential treatment?
The fundamental principle requiring fair treatment of investors applies to the EuVECA Manager. However, this does not prevent more favourable treatment of private investors compared to a public investor, provided that such treatment complies with State aid rules and is disclosed in the EuVECA Fund’s rules or instruments of incorporation.
In fact, the EuVECA Manager is not allowed to provide preferential treatment unless it is disclosed in the rules or instruments of incorporation of the EuVECA Fund.
When structuring the EuVECA Fund, attention should be paid to this point to avoid the need for amending the articles with shareholder consent regarding this matter. Furthermore, the definition of preferential treatment should be assessed according to Luxembourg law, as the notion of investors in a comparable situation might raise specific challenges.
12 What are the general principles applicable to EUVECA managers?
The EuVECA Managers must for each EuVECA Fund they manage:
- act honestly, fairly, and with due skill, care, and diligence in conducting their activities;
- apply appropriate policies and procedures for preventing malpractices that can reasonably be expected to affect the interests of the investors and the qualifying portfolio undertakings;
- conduct their business activities in such a way as to promote the best interests of the qualifying venture capital funds they manage, the investors therein, and the integrity of the market;
- apply a high level of diligence in the selection and ongoing monitoring of investments in qualifying portfolio undertakings;
- possess adequate knowledge and understanding of the qualifying portfolio undertakings in which they invest; and
- treat their investors fairly (see above for preferential treatments).
13 What are the delegation provisions applicable to EUVECA managers?
The delegation of functions by a EUVECA Manager to third parties does not affect the EUVECA Manager’s liability towards the EuVECA Fund or its investors. The EUVECA Manager must not delegate functions to such an extent that, in essence, it can no longer be considered the EUVECA Manager, or so that it becomes a letter-box entity.
The delegation of functions must not undermine the effectiveness of the EUVECA Manager’s supervision and, in particular, must not prevent it from acting, or the EUVECA Fund from being managed, in the best interests of the investors.
14 What are the own fund requirements applicable to the EUVECA funds?
The EuVECA Manager must maintain sufficient own funds and utilize adequate and appropriate human and technical resources for the effective management of the EuVECA Funds at all times. The own funds should always amount to at least one-eighth of the fixed overheads incurred by the EuVECA Manager in the preceding year. The competent authority of the EuVECA Manager, which is the CSSF in Luxembourg, may adjust that requirement in the event of a significant change to the business. If a full business year has not been completed, the requirement will be one-eighth of the fixed overheads projected in the business plan, unless the CSSF requires an adjustment to that plan.
The initial capital for both internal and external EuVECA Managers should be EUR 50,000.
If the value of the EuVECA Funds managed by the EuVECA Manager exceeds EUR 250,000,000, additional own funds must be provided. This additional amount should be equal to 0,02 % of the amount by which the total value of the EuVECA Funds exceeds EUR 250,000,000. The EuVECA Manager may be permitted not to provide up to 50 % of such additional own funds if it has a guarantee of the same amount from a credit institution or an insurance undertaking located in the EU, or in a third country where it is subject to prudential rules that the CSSF considers equivalent to those set in Union law.
Own funds should be invested in liquid assets or assets readily convertible into cash in the short term and should not include speculative positions.
15 What valuation rules and accounting requirements should the EUVECA funds comply with?
Rules for the valuation of assets of the EUVECA Funds shall be laid down in their rules or instruments of incorporation and shall ensure a sound and transparent valuation process. The valuation procedures used shall ensure that the assets are valued properly and that the asset value is calculated at least annually. Given that the purpose of the EUVECA Regulation is to grant a marketing label, references are made to the applicable accounting rules, company law rules, and product rules relating to valuation.
A Luxembourg EUVECA Manager shall provide an annual report to the CSSF for each EUVECA Fund they manage, within six months after the end of the financial year. This report shall detail the composition of the portfolio of EUVECA Fund and its activities during the previous year. It should also disclose the profits earned by the EUVECA Fund at the end of its life and, if applicable, the profits distributed during its life. This report shall also include its audited financial accounts. The annual report must be produced in compliance with existing reporting standards and the terms agreed upon between the EUVECA Managers and investors. The report should be made available to investors upon request. Furthermore, the EUVECA Managers and investors may agree to provide additional disclosures to each other.
The audit of the EUVECA Fund shall be conducted at least annually. It must confirm that money and assets are held in the name of the EUVECA Fund and that the EUVECA Manager has established and maintained adequate records and checks regarding the use of any mandate or control over the money and assets of the EUVECA Fund and its investors.
Where a EUVECA Manager is required to make public an annual financial report in accordance with transparency requirements relating to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market, the information mentioned above may be provided separately or as an additional part of the annual financial report.
16What are the obligations of providing investor information concerning EUVECA funds?
The EuVECA Managers shall, for each EUVECA Fund they manage, inform the respective investors, in a clear, fair, understandable, and not misleading manner, of the following prior to their investment decision:
- the identity of the EUVECA Manager and any other service providers it has contracted in relation to the management of the EUVECA Fund, and a description of the delegates’ duties;
- the amount of own funds available to the EUVECA Manager for maintaining the adequate human and technical resources necessary for the proper management of its EUVECA Funds;
- a description of the investment strategy and objectives of the EUVECA Fund, including:
the types of the qualifying portfolio undertakings in which it intends to invest;
any other EUVECA Fund in which it intends to invest;
the types of qualifying portfolio undertakings in which the target EUVECA, if any, intends to invest in;
the non-qualifying investments which it intends to make;
the techniques that it intends to employ; and
any applicable investment restrictions;
- a description of the risk profile of the EUVECA Fund and any risks associated with the assets in which it may invest or investment techniques that may be employed;
- a description of the valuation procedure and of the pricing methodology for the valuation of assets, including the methods used for the valuation of qualifying portfolio undertakings;
- a description of how the remuneration of the EUVECA Manager is calculated;
- a description of all relevant costs and of the maximum amounts thereof;
- where available, the historical financial performance of the EUVECA Manager;
- the business support services and the other support activities provided by the EUVECA Manager or arranged through third parties in order to facilitate the development, growth or in some other respect the ongoing operations of the qualifying portfolio undertakings in which the EUVECA Fund invests, or, where these services or activities are not provided, a negative disclosure;
- a description of the procedures by which the investment strategy or investment policy, or both, may be amended.
Such information is to be kept up to date and reviewed regularly where relevant.
Where the EUVECA Fund is required to publish a prospectus, in accordance with the Prospectus Regulation, or in accordance with the national law of the EUVECA Fund, the above-mentioned information may be provided separately or as a part of the prospectus.
17 How does the EUVECA manager address conflicts of interest?
Conflicts of interest (COIs) are situations where a EuVECA Manager, a person who effectively conducts the business of that manager, an employee, or any person
who directly or indirectly controls or is controlled by that manager by another EUVECA Fund or a UCI, or the investor therein:
- is likely to make a financial gain, or avoid a financial loss, at the expense of the EUVECA Fund or its investors;
- has an interest in the outcome of a service or an activity provided to the EUVECA Fund or to its investors which is distinct from their interest;
- has an interest in the outcome of a transaction carried out on behalf of the EUVECA Fund or its investors which is distinct from their interest;
- has a financial or other incentive favouring the interest of one or more investor(s) or another UCI over the interest of the EUVECA Fund or its investors,
- has a financial or other incentive favouring the interest of investor of the EUVECA Fund over the interest of one or more investor(s) of the same EUVECA Fund;
- carries out the same activities for both the EUVECA Fund and another UCI, or an investor;
- pays or is paid any fee or commission, or provides or is provided with any non-monetary benefits, other than those laid down in Article 24 (1) of AIFMD Commission Delegated Regulation;
- influences and has a personal interest in influencing the development of a qualifying portfolio undertaking to the disadvantage of the EUVECA Fund or its investors or at the expense of the achievement of the objectives of the EUVECA Fund.
These definitions are quite broad compared to some Luxembourg company rules relating to COIs as the EUVECA Regulation deals with, inter alia, non-financial COIs.
The EUVECA Manager shall establish, implement and maintain a written COI policy appropriate to its size and organisational structure given the nature, scale, and complexity of its business. The COI policy identifies the circumstances that may give rise to a COI and specifies the measures to be adopted and the procedures to be followed on an ongoing basis.
The procedures and measures to prevent, manage and monitor the COIs shall include at least the following steps:
- the prohibition of the exchange of information between the persons or entities mentioned in the above definition of COIs, where such an exchange of information could lead to or facilitate a COI;
- the separation of the supervision of persons or entities mentioned in the above definition of COIs whose interests may conflict;
- the removal of the connection between or dependence on the remuneration of the persons or entities mentioned in the above definition of COIs principally engaged in one activity, and the remuneration of, or revenues generated by, persons or entities principally engaged in another activity, where a COI may arise in relation to those activities;
- the prevention of persons or entities mentioned in the above definition of COIs from exercising inappropriate influence over the management of the EUVECA Fund;
- the prevention or control of the involvement of persons or entities mentioned in the above definition of COIs in any activity that may lead to a COI.
When these measures and procedures are insufficient to prevent, with reasonable confidence, the risks of damage to the interests of the EUVECA Fund or its investors, the managers of a EUVECA Fund shall promptly inform their senior management or other competent internal body, or the senior management or other competent internal body of the EUVECA Fund, of the risk of damage to the interests of that fund or its investors. Also, they may take any decision or action to ensure that they act in the best interest of the EUVECA Fund or its investors.
Regarding the COIs relating to the portfolio of the EUVECA Fund, the EUVECA Manager shall have written adequate and effective strategies for determining when and how to exercise voting rights held in the portfolio of the EUVECA Fund for the benefit of both EUVECA Fund concerned and its investors.
These strategies shall include at least the following steps:
- monitoring the relevant corporate actions;
- ensuring that the exercise of voting rights is in accordance with the investment objectives and policy of the EUVECA Fund;
- prevention and management of any COI arising from the exercise of those voting rights.
Investors may request the EUVECA Manager to provide them with a summary description of such strategies and the details of the actions taken pursuant to them.
Where organisational arrangements made by a EUVECA Manager are not sufficient to ensure, with reasonable confidence, that risks of damage to investors’ interests will be prevented, the EuVECA Manager shall disclose the COIs and their general nature or sources to the investors in a durable medium and keep that information up to date. Such disclosures may be performed on a website provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
- the investors have been notified of the address of the website and of the place on the website where the information can be accessed;
- the investors have consented to the provision of that information by means of a website; and
- the information is continuously accessible on the website for such a period as the investors may reasonably need to access it.
18 What conditions must a registered AIFM meet when intending to market a EUVECA fund?
A EUVECA Manager, registered as an AIFM, intending to use the designation ‘EUVECA’ for marketing EUVECA funds must inform the CSSF of their intention and provide the following information:
- the identity of the persons who effectively conduct the business of managing EUVECA funds;
- the identity of the EUVECA Funds, the units or shares which are to be marketed, and their investment strategies;
- information on the arrangements made for complying with the conditions for the use of the designation of EUVECA as further developed in the EUVECA Regulation (mostly the above-mentioned points);
- a list of Member States where the EUVECA Manager intends to market each EUVECA Fund.
The CSSF will register the EUVECA Manager provided that the following conditions are met:
- the persons who effectively conduct the business of managing EUVECA Funds are of sufficiently good repute and are sufficiently experienced also in relation to the investment strategies pursued by the EUVECA Manager;
- such information is complete; and
- the arrangements made for complying with the conditions for the use of the designation of EUVECA as further developed in the EUVECA Regulation (mostly the above-mentioned points) are indeed compliant with such conditions.
The CSSF will inform the applicant whether it has been registered as a EUVECA Manager no later than two months after receiving all required information.
This registration is valid throughout the EU and permits EUVECA Managers to market EUVECA Funds under the EUVECA label across the EU. The competent authorities of the Member States where the EUVECA Fund is marketed may not impose on the EUVECA Manager any requirements or administrative procedures (including fees and other charges) related to the marketing of their EUVECA Funds, nor shall they require any prior approval of that marketing. The EUVECA Manager must inform the CSSF when it intends to market a new EUVECA Fund or an existing one in a Member State not previously mentioned in the list of Member States where the marketing of the shares or units of such EUVECA Fund is intended.
Registration as a EuVECA Manager also constitutes a registration as an AIFM in terms of managing EuVECA Funds. However, the EUVECA marketing passport only applies to EUVECA Funds, meaning the EUVECA Manager may manage non-EUVECA AIFs, but they cannot be marketed under the EUVECA marketing passport.
A EUVECA Manager must notify the CSSF of any material changes to the conditions for its initial registration as a EUVECA Manager before implementing such changes. This requirement shows that even an unregulated AIF, managed and marketed under the EUVECA label, is thus regulated. If the CSSF decides to impose restrictions or reject the changes, it will inform the EUVECA Manager within one month of receipt of the notification of those changes. The CSSF may extend that period by up to one month if it deems necessary due to the specific circumstances of the case, after notifying EUVECA Manager. The changes may be implemented if the CSSF does not oppose the changes within the relevant period.
19What are the conditions that authorised AIFMs must adhere to if they plan to use the EUVECA designation for the AIFs they manage?
Authorised AIFMs should apply for registration of the AIFs they intend to label as ‘EUVECA’. This registration application should be submitted to the competent authority of the funds, which, for Luxembourg investment funds, is the CSSF. The application should include the following:
- the rules or instruments of incorporation;
- the same information required for an applicant registered AIFM as mentioned above;
- the information on the identity of the depositary;
- a list of Member States in which the applicants have established, or intend to establish, the AIFs.
Applicant authorised AIFMs are not required to provide information or documents they have already submitted under the AIFMD. They should comply with the same requirements imposed on the registered AIFMs as mentioned earlier.
The CSSF should inform the applicant whether the fund has been registered as a EUVECA Fund no later than two months after receiving all the required documentation.
Registration is valid across the entire EU and permits the marketing of EUVECA Funds throughout the Union under the ‘EUVECA’ designation. The competent authorities of the Member States where the EUVECA Fund is marketed may not impose any requirements or administrative procedures (including fees and other charges) relating to the marketing of their EUVECA Funds. They also should not require any approval of the marketing prior to its commencement.
The EUVECA Manager should inform the CSSF when it intends to market a new EUVECA Fund, or an existing one in a Member State not previously mentioned in the list of Member States where the marketing of the shares or units of such EUVECA Fund is intended.
Generally, the EUVECA Regulation acts as lex specialis and supersedes the provisions of the AIFMD in the absence of clear rules. ESMA confirmed this rule in Answer 1c of its Q&As on the application of the EUVECA Regulation.
20Can the CSSF refuse to register an AIFM as EUVECA Manager and/or an AIF as a EUVECA fund?
Yes. Any refusal to register an AIFM as EUVECA Manager or an AIF as a EUVECA Fund must be substantiated and communicated to the applicant. This refusal is subject to a right of appeal. This right of appeal is also applicable when no decision on registration has been made within two months of the applicant providing all required information.
21Is there an EU registry that lists all EUVECA managers?
Yes. ESMA maintains a central database, which is publicly accessible on its website. It lists all EUVECA Managers and EUVECA Funds, as well as the countries in which those funds are marketed (https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/searchRegister?core=esma_registers_funds).
22 Glossary of terms
AIF: Alternative investment funds as defined in the AIFMD.
AIFM: Alternative investment fund manager as defined in the AIFMD.
AIFMD: Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers as amended from time to time
AML/CFT: Anti-money laundering/counter-financing of terrorism.
COI: Conflict of interest.
CSSF: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, the Luxembourg competent authority for the supervision of the financial sector
EEA: European Economic Area.
EU: European Union or established one of the Member States of the European Union as the case may be.
EuVECA Fund: Investment fund with the EuVECA label according to the EuVECA Regulation
EuVECA Manager: AIFM with the EuVECA label according to the EuVECA Regulation.
EuVECA Regulation : Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2013 on European venture capital funds as amended from time to time.
FATF: Financial Action Task Force
Member State: Member State of the EU.
MiFID: Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU.
Multilateral trading facility (MTF): Multilateral system, operated by an investment firm or a market operator, which brings together multiple third-party buying and selling interests in financial instruments – in the system and in accordance with non-discretionary rules – in a way that results in a contract.
Prospectus Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market, and repealing Directive 2003/71/EC.
SME: Company that has an average market capitalisation of less than EUR 200 000 000 on the basis of end-year quotes for the previous three calendar years
SME Growth Market:an MTF that is registered as an SME growth market in accordance with MiFID.
UCI: Undertaking for collective investments/ collective investment undertaking
UCITS: Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities constituted in accordance with UCITSD.
UCITSD: Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) as amended from time to time.
VC: Venture capital.
23 How can we assist you?
Our investment management team:
- Supports you in finding the suitable investment vehicle to meet your requirements and your goals from a marketing, regulatory, legal and tax perspective.
- Introduces you to the suitable service providers to meet your requirements (i.e., custodian bank, AIFM, administrative agent, registrar and transfer agent and auditor).
- Provides assistance with the establishment of the fund (i.e., drafting of the PPM, assistance with the incorporation of the fund and its general partner and regulatory filings with the CSSF).
- Provides assistance with respect to the migration of offshore funds into Luxembourg funds.
- Provides corporate support services throughout the lifetime of your fund (i.e., amendment of fund documents, restructuring, launching or closing sub-funds, etc.).
- Provides assistance with changing of service providers including custodian bank, fund administrator, auditor or registrar and transfer agent).
- Provides assistance with the listing of the units of the fund on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated or EURO MTF markets.
- Provides support in the registration of the fund in other jurisdictions (in cooperation with local service providers).
- Provides advice on AIFMD-related issues.
- Provides advice to fund promoters on local private placement rules for marketing their funds in Luxembourg.
- Keeps you up to date on new legal and regulatory developments.
February 15, 2024
Luxembourg special limited partnership (SCSp)
01 Introduction to the limited partnership
Luxembourg has enhanced its existing limited partnership regime, adding the special limited partnership to its range of investment vehicles designed for the alternative investment industry, including private equity. The authorities have adopted a pragmatic and business-friendly approach to meet the most stringent requirements of alternative fund managers. We summarise below the main legal and tax rules applicable to regulated and unregulated Luxembourg common limited partnerships and special limited partnerships.
The Luxembourg limited partnership is an entity established for a limited or unlimited period of time either as a common limited partnership (société en commandite simple or SCS) or a special limited partnership (société en commandite spéciale or SCSp), by one or more unlimited partners with joint and unlimited liability, or by one or several limited partners liable up to the value of their contributions.
Contributions to the limited partnership may be made in cash, in kind or by other means such as services under the terms and conditions of the limited partnership agreement, and may be freely determined by the partners. In contrast to other Luxembourg legal entities, contributions in the form of services do not require an external valuation report, and their value may be determined by private agreement.
In addition, unlike most common corporate structures under Luxembourg law, the limited partnership does not impose any minimum capital requirements.
Partnership interests, representing contributions to the limited partnership, may or may not be represented by securities. In a limited partnership that does not issue securities to its investors, each limited partner has a capital account, an equity account in the accounting records of the limited partnership. It typically varies according to the initial and subsequent contributions by partners, profits and losses recorded by the limited partnership and allocated to the partners under the LPA, and distributions to the partners.
The main difference between the common and special limited partnerships is that the former has a legal personality distinct from that of its partners, whereas the special limited partnership does not have legal personality, making it very similar to the limited partnership under English law.
02 Practical use of the limited partnership as an investment vehicle
The features of the limited partnership make this entity a very attractive new addition to the Luxembourg investment toolbox.
The limited partnership may be used for master-feeder structures, as an acquisition vehicle, or for joint ventures, but its most frequent use is for private equity, venture capital and real estate investments. The popularity of the limited partnership for private equity investments is down to the high level of contractual or corporate flexibility provided by its legal form, which is familiar to Anglo-Saxon investors and promoters due to its resemblance to the English limited partnership.
As a general rule, the limited partnership does not automatically fall under the definition of an alternative investment fund (AIF), but it may take the form of a collective investment undertaking with multiple compartments that raises capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for their benefit, and does not require authorisation under the UCITS regime.
Under these circumstances, the limited partnership qualifies as an AIF in accordance with the 2013 legislation on alternative investment fund managers and may carry out its activity either as an entity regulated by the Financial Sector Supervisory Authority (CSSF) under the SIF or SICAR legal regime, or as an unregulated entity. Irrespective of whether it is regulated or unregulated, the AIF must appoint an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) that may be registered or authorised depending on the value of its portfolio of AIF assets under management.
From a corporate structure perspective, if the SCS qualifies as an AIF and it is internally managed, the SCS itself will be authorised or registered as an AIFM. If, however, the SCS appoints an external AIFM, the general partner or third-party AIFM must be registered or authorised under the 2013 legislation.
The SCSp, on the other hand, may not be authorised as an internally managed AIF due to its lack of legal personality, so it must appoint an external entity (which may be its unlimited partner acting as the general partner or another company) as external AIFM.
Finally, unregulated special limited partnerships are often used to invest in private equity, venture capital and real estate assets and any other alternative assets.
03 Setting up an unregulated limited partnership investment vehicle
The main practical steps in establishing a limited partnership as an alternative investment fund (AIF) are:
- Incorporating the general partner.
- Executing a limited partnership agreement (LPA) by means of a private or notarial deed.
- Engaging the required service providers, subject to the regulated or unregulated status of the limited partnership.
- Publishing the required extract from the limited partnership agreement in the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register.
- Establishing a register of partnership interests.
- Requesting the registration or authorisation of the AIFM by the CSSF.
04 Management of the limited partnership
The limited partnership is managed by one or more managers who do not necessarily have to be unlimited partners. In practice, however, the unlimited partner is often the manager of the limited partnership.
Where management of the limited partnership is not entrusted to the unlimited partner, the liability of the manager is governed by the general provisions applicable to board members provided by the 1915 law on commercial companies. These stipulate that the manager of the limited partnership is responsible for the execution of the mandate and for any misconduct in the management of the limited partnership, and is jointly and severally liable toward the limited partnership and third parties for damages stemming from breach of the law or the LPA.
Subject to the provisions of the LPA, the manager of a limited partnership may delegate the management to a third party, which will be liable only for the performance of its own mandate.
Contractually agreed restrictions regarding the powers of managers cannot be applied in relation to third parties, even if published in the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register. However, the LPA may authorise one or more managers to represent the limited partnership, either jointly or individually, and such a clause is valid with regard to third parties, subject to publication formalities.
The acts of the managers may bind the limited partnership even if they exceed the corporate purpose mentioned in the LPA, unless it can be proven that the third party was aware that the act was outside the scope of the corporate purpose or if, in the context, the third party could not have been unaware of such circumstance.
05 Legal regime regarding limited partners
Distributions in a SCSp
The limited partnership legal regime allows partners to tailor their participation in profits and losses, as well as distributions, as they deem appropriate in the LPA. If the constitutive deed of the limited partnership does not provide any rules in this respect, each limited partner shall participate proportionally to the subscription of its partnership interests.
The limited partnership may distribute profits or reimburse partnership interests, as contractually agreed in the LPA. The freedom provided by the legal provisions governing the LPA allow partners of private equity partnership agreements to structure any clawback provisions regarding the general partner or the limited partners in line with agreed commercial terms.
Voting rights in a SCSp
Unless provided otherwise in the LPA, as a general rule the voting rights of each partner are proportional to their partnership interests.
Decision-making process in a SCSp
The decision-making process may also be tailored by the provisions of the LPA and the agreement may list resolutions that do not require a decision by the partners. However, certain aspects must be decided upon by the partners, namely the corporate purpose, a change of nationality, conversion of legal form or liquidation of the limited partnership.
The formalities and conditions for passing resolutions should be determined in the LPA, otherwise, the rules are as follows:
- Written consultations and vote in writing - resolutions of the partners shall be adopted at general meetings by means of consultation in writing; before such consultations, each partner shall receive the precise text of the resolutions and express their vote in writing.
- Majority of votes rule – decisions shall be validly adopted by a majority of votes expressed irrespective of the portion of partnership interests represented, except for amendments regarding the corporate purpose, change of nationality, conversion of legal form or the liquidation of the limited partnership, which require the consent of partners representing three-quarters of the partnership interests and of the unlimited partner.
- Partners representing more than half of the partnership interests may convene a meeting.
Transfer of partnership interests in a SCSp
Unless otherwise stated in the LPA, the transfer, dismemberment, or pledge of limited partnership interests is subject to the approval of the unlimited partner. If the LPA does not contain any provisions in this regard, the transfer, dismemberment, or pledge of partnership interests of the unlimited partner is subject to the consent of the limited partners, who shall deliberate according to the rules regarding amendment of the LPA. Transfers by cause of death do not require approval in either case.
06 The liability of limited partners
The unlimited partner has unlimited and joint liability for the obligations of the limited partnership, while limited partners’ liability is restricted to the amount of their subscribed partnership interests.
In general, limited partners are forbidden to carry out any acts of external management – acts performed for the account of the limited partnership with third parties. However, it is not forbidden for the limited partner to perform acts of internal management that are internal to the limited partnership.
An act of external management triggers unlimited liability on the part of the limited partner toward third parties, although not toward other members of the limited partnership. In these circumstances, the limited partner in question may become jointly and severally liable toward third parties for any obligations of the limited partnership in which it was involved through acts of management.
The scope of the joint liability of the limited partner in these circumstances depends on its involvement in the management of the limited partnership. An isolated rather than regular act of external management will result in liability only for the commitments or obligations of the limited partnership in which it has taken part. A limited partner that has regularly performed acts of management involving third parties may be liable to those third parties even for commitments or obligations in which it did not take part.
Luxembourg’s 1915 law on commercial companies provides a non-exhaustive list of actions that do not constitute acts of external management triggering a limited partner’s liability towards third parties: exercising partner prerogatives; providing advice to affiliated entities, managers of the limited partnership or to the limited partnership itself; oversight or control functions; granting loans, guarantees or securities, or any other type of financial assistance; and approving acts outside the duties of the managers.
Limited partners may as a rule carry out any acts of internal management and in general, any acts that would not mislead a reasonable third party regarding the scope of the involvement of the limited partner, including voting on any issues subject to their consent under the LPA such as amendments to the agreement, extension of the partnership’s duration, winding up of the partnership or removal of a manager, or acting or being represented on any internal body of the limited partnership, such as an investment committee or advisory board, even if the body has a power of decision over actions taken by the partnership.
The commercial companies legislation also states that a limited partner will not lose its limited liability by acting as director or agent of a manager of the limited partnership, even if the manager is an unlimited partner, or may execute documents on behalf of a manager, in its capacity as a representative of the limited partnership. However, this safe harbour provision requires the capacity in which the limited partner is acting to be clearly indicated.
The 1915 law also authorises a limited partner to conduct transactions with the limited partnership without its rank as privileged or general creditor being affected by its capacity as a limited partner. For example, a limited partner lending money to the partnership will have the same ranking as a creditor of the limited partnership as external entities.
07 The tax regime for unregulated limited partnerships
Direct taxation of a SCSp
Unregulated SCS and SCSp are tax-transparent entities for corporate income tax and net worth tax purposes. The partnership should not be subject to corporate income tax, subject to the analysis of the application of the reverse hybrid rule. As from 1 January 2022, the scope of Luxembourg anti-hybrid rules has been extended to entities that are transparent for Luxembourg tax purposes, such as the special limited partnership. The 2023 Luxembourg budget law provides the following clarification, applicable as from the tax year 2022: the anti-hybrid rules shall not apply when the investors are tax-exempt due to a subjective exemption or because they are either residents or registered in a no-tax jurisdiction.
Municipal business tax of 6.75% (rate of Luxembourg-city) may become applicable in the event that the limited partnership carries out any commercial activity or is deemed to be doing so. The limited partnership is deemed to be carrying out a commercial activity if its general partner is a Luxembourg public or private limited liability company holding at least 5% of the partnership interests. However, proper structuring of the general partner partnership interest should ensure the limited partnership will not be deemed to be carrying out a commercial activity.
The Luxembourg direct taxation authority has clarified in the circular of January 9, 2015, that unregulated SCS or SCSp qualifying as an AIF within the meaning of the law of 2013 on alternative investment fund managers are deemed not to be performing a commercial activity. Therefore, an unregulated SCS or SCSp that is an AIF will be completely tax-neutral, provided that no general partner is a Luxembourg company holding 5% or more of the partnership interests.
Finally, as tax-transparent entities, neither SCS nor SCSp benefit from Luxembourg’s double taxation avoidance treaties, nor from the EU’s Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96/EU).
VAT
Management services provided to an SCS or SCSp that qualifies as an AIF are exempt from value-added tax.
Luxembourg withholding tax on dividends
Dividend distributions made by an SCS or SCSp to resident or non-resident partners are not subject to withholding tax in Luxembourg.
08 The main benefits of the Luxembourg limited partnership as an unregulated investment vehicle
Contractual flexibility of an SCSp
One of the main advantages offered by the limited partnership is the contractual freedom of the parties. Apart from a limited number of statutory provisions, there is great flexibility in determining the rules governing the functioning of the limited partnership.
Short time to market of an SCSp
The ability to incorporate the limited partnership under private deed and the absence of cumbersome registration formalities allows the investment vehicle to be brought to market in less than a month.
No minimum capital requirement or minimum investment
The incorporation of the limited partnership does not impose any legal minimum capital, in contrast to Luxembourg private and public limited liability companies, making the limited partnership an attractive vehicle for venture capital investment. Furthermore, the LPA may permit subscriptions from all types of investor without minimum investment requirements.
Low launch costs of an SCSp
Unregulated status, the ability to incorporate the entity by private deed, and the absence of the requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the limited partnership qualifies as an AIF and is managed by an authorised or registered AIFM) make the limited partnership a less expensive option than other investment vehicles on the market.
Confidentiality
The information to be published in the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register is limited to the name of the limited partnership, its duration, the unlimited partner and the managers, including their signatory powers. The identity of the limited partners does not have to be disclosed.
09 Compare Luxembourg vehicles
Compare two vehicles:
UCITS | Part II UCI | ELTIF | SIF | SICAR | RAIF | SPF | Securitisation vehicle | Unregulated SCS/SCSp | Ordinary Luxembourg company | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practical use | Highly regulated vehicle which can be sold through a EU passport to all types of investors (such as retail investors, professional investors, institutional investors). | Investment funds which could be used for investment strategies that do not meet the criteria set by the UCITS directives. | EU marketing label for long-term investment funds, private equity funds, infrastructure funds, debt funds, funds of funds, sustainable finance, debt funds, co-investments, securitisation, debt funds, investments in fintechs, real assets. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Private equity and venture capital transactions. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Individuals wishing to optimise their personal tax planning (private wealth management purposes). | • True sale and synthetic securitisations. • Securitisation of a portfolio of securities. • Securitisation as structure for intra group financing activities. • Securitisation of non-performing loans. • Securitisation of leasing receivables. • Securitisation of both tangible and intangible assets. • CLOs (possibility of active management). | Private equity, venture capital and real estate investments and any other alternative investments. | Holding and financing activity, commercial activity, holding of IP, etc. |
Applicable legislation | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part I (“UCITS Law”). | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part II (“UCI Law”). | Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds (“ELTIF Regulation”). The ELTIF Regulation has been amended on 15 March 2023 with significant changes which favour the fund market participants, fund financing and investors, in particular, the process of retailization and the amendments will apply from 10 January 2024. The ELTIF column has been drafted according to the amended ELTIF Regulation ("ELTIF 2 Regulation"). | Law of 13 February 2007 (“SIF Law”). | Law of 15 June 2004 (“SICAR Law”). | Law of 23 July 2016 (“RAIF Law”). | Law of 11 May 2007 (“SPF Law”). | Law of 22 March 2004 (“Securitisation Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). |
Authorisation and supervision by the CSSF | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Non. | Non. | No, unless issue on a continuous basis of financial instruments offered to the public. The securitisation vehicle issues on a continuous basis when it carries out more than three issuances of financial instruments offered to the public during the financial year. All the issuances by the compartments should be added up. The issuance of financial instruments is offered to the public when it is not intended for professional clients, the denominations are less than 100,000 euros and it is not distributed as private placement. | Non. | Non. |
Qualification as an AIF | No. | Always an AIF. | Always an AIF. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Always an AIF. | In principle, no (as it would not be considered as “raising” capital from a number of investors as the structure generally serves for the investment of the private wealth of a “pre-existing group” (as defined in the Esma guidelines on key concepts of the AIFMD)). | No, in case • such vehicle meets the definition of “securitisation special purpose vehicle ” under the AIFM Law; • it issues collateralised debt obligations; • it only issues debt instruments; • such entity is not managed according to an investment policy within the meaning of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. |
Exemption from AIFMD full regime under lighter regime (AIFMD registration regime) | Not applicable. | Possible. | No. | Possible. | Possible. | No. | Not applicable. | Possible. | Possible. | Possible. |
External authorised AIFM requirement | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed. Always an authorised EU AIFM. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Always required. | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. |
Eligible investors | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Restricted to: • natural persons acting in the context of the management of their personal wealth; • management entities acting solely in the interest of the private wealth (e.g. trusts, private foundations); and intermediaries acting for the account of the above mentioned eligible investors (e.g. bank acting under a fiduciary agreement). | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Eligible assets | Restricted to transferable securities admitted or dealt on a regulated market, investment funds, financial derivative instruments, cash and money market instruments that are in compliance with article 41 of the Ucits law and the relevant EU directives and regulations. Please note that the eligibility of the asset must be ascertained on a case-by-case basis in view of the applicable laws and regulatory practice. | Unrestricted. The investment objective and strategy of the fund is subject to the prior approval of the CSSF. | Restricted to: - equity or quasi-equity instruments and debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking; -loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking with a maturity that does not exceed the life of the ELTIF, - units or shares of one or several other ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM provided that those ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs¸ UCITS and EU AIFs invest in eligible investments (this wording) and have not themselves invested more than 10% of their assets in any other UCI; - real assets; - certain STS securitisations (where the underlying exposures are residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial loans backed by mortgages on commercial immovable property, credit facilities, trade receivables and other underlying exposures; provided that, for the two last ones, the proceeds from the securitisation bonds are used for financing or refinancing long-term investments), - EU Green Bonds issued by a qualifying portfolio, and UCITS eligible assets. Qualifying portfolio undertaking is an undertaking that fulfils, at the time of the initial investment, the following requirements: - it is not a financial undertaking undertaking, unless it is a financial undertaking, other than a financial holding company or a mixed-activity holding company, that has been authorized or registered more recently than 5 years before the date of the investment (fintechs); - is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility; or is admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility and has a market capitalisation of no more than EUR 1 500 000 000; - it is established in a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country is not identified as high-risk third and is not mentioned in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax prusposes. ELTIFs are not allowed to: - short sell - take direct or indirect exposure to commodities; - enter into securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase transactions, or any other agreement which has an equivalent economic effect and poses similar risks, if more than 10 % of the assets of the ELTIF are affected; - use financial derivative instruments, except where the use of such instruments solely serves the purpose of hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF. | Unrestricted. | Restricted to investments in securities representing risk capital. According to the CSSF Circular 06/241, investment in risk capital is to be understood as the direct or indirect contribution of assets to entities in view of their launch, their development or their listing on a stock exchange. The SICAR is not allowed to invest directly in real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted, unless it invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a Sicar). | Restricted to acquisition, detention, management and realisation of financial assets. The SPF is not allowed to carry out commercial activities or to hold directly real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted. The securitisation vehicle may acquire or assume, directly or through another undertaking, risks relating to claims, other assets, or obligations assumed by third parties or inherent to all or part of the activities of third parties and issues financial instruments or contracts, for all or part of it, any type of loan, whose value or yield depends on such risks. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Risk diversification requirements | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 42 et seq. of the UCITS Law, e.g. (not exhaustive): • a UCITS may not invest more than 10% of its assets in transferable securities or money market instruments issued by the same body; • a UCITS may not invest more than 20% of its net assets in deposits made with the same body; • the global exposure relating to derivative instruments does not exceed the total net value of the UCITS portfolio. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by IML Circular 91/75 (as amended by CSSF Circular n° 05/177). Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS. In particular, a UCI is not allowed to invest more than 20% of its net assets in securities issued by any one issuer. Specific restrictions concerning funds adopting an alternative investment strategy are contained in CSSF Circular n° 02/80. | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 13 and 17 of the ELITF Regulation (not exhaustive): ELTIFs marketed to retail investors shall not invest more than: - 20 % of its capital in instruments issued by, or loans granted to, any single qualifying portfolio undertaking; - 20 % of its capital in a single real asset; - 20 % of its capital in units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS, or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM; - 10 % of its capital in UCITS (liquid) assets where those assets have been issued by any single body; or 25 % where bonds are issued by a credit institution which has its registered office in a Member State and is subject by law to special public supervision designed to protect bond-holders; - The aggregate value of STS Securitisations in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 20% of the value of the capital of the ELTIF; - The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by CSSF Circular n° 07/309. Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS and UCI. In particular, a SIF is not allowed to invest more than 30% of its net assets in securities of the same type issued by the same issuer. | No risk diversification requirements. | Risk diversification requirements are aligned with those applicable to SIFs, unless the RAIF chooses to invest in risk capital only and such choice is mentioned in its constitutive documents. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. |
Legal Form | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA,SCA) All of these entities must be open-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP, SICAV and SICAF in various legal forms, Soparfis, SCS, SCSp, SCA and future forms entitling an AIF to be authorized as an ELTIF. In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCS • SCSp • SCoSA The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCSA | A securitisation vehicle may be set up in one of the following forms: • a securitisation company (SA, Sàrl, SCS, SCSp, SENC, SCA, SAS, SCSA); or • a securitisation fund consisting of one or several co-ownerships or one or several fiduciary estates and managed by a management company. | • SCS • SCSp | • SA, Sàrl, SCA • SAS • SCoSA • SCS • SCSp |
Umbrella structure | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. Application for authorisation as ELTIF of one or more compartments may be submitted | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | No. | Yes. | No. | No. |
Capital requirements | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 6 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 6 months following its authorisation. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 12 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 12 months following its authorisation. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the capital requirements applicable to an ELTIF are the capital requirements applicable to fund, in particular due to the national product law. | EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. | EUR 1,000,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the auhorisation by the CSSF. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the entry into force of the management regulations. • SICAV: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the incorporation of the SICAV. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 • SCSA: no minimum capital. | If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a company, it depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a fund, there is no minimum capital requirement. | No minimum capital requirement. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 No minimum capital requirement for other legal forms. |
Required service providers | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • As ELTIF is an EU label, the required service providers for an ELTIF depend on the applicable national product law. • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. However, if the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, the Depositary shall comply with the UCITS depositary requirements and be a Depositary institution • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Other service providers required by the relevant product rules. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | Registered auditor in principle not required unless two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. | • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the securitisation vehicle qualifies as an AIF). • Management company (if the securitisation vehicle is set up in the form of a fund). • Independent auditor. • No depository institution (unless for regulated securisation vehicles). • No administrative agent. | For SCS: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCS qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCS qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). For SCSp: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). | Registered auditor in principle not required unless the company is an AIF managed by an AIFM with AUM above the threshold or two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. On 28 July 2023, draft bill 8286 (the Draft Bill) was released, aiming to overhaul Luxembourg accounting law applicable to undertakings (the New Law). It is expected to be adopted in 2025. |
Possibility of listing | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes, but difficult in practice. | Yes. | No. | No. | In principle, no. The SCS/SCSp may however issue debt securities that are eligible to be listed on the stock exchange. | Yes. |
European passport | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. |
Net asset value (NAV) calculation and redemption frequency | The UCITS must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least twice a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. As ELTIF is an EU label, the NAV computation and redemption frequency depend on applicable national product law and the AIFM law. At least once a year for reporting purposes. Redemption frequency: In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF; - redemptions are limited to a percentage of the UCITS (liquid) assets of the ELTIF. An ELTIF may offer, under certain conditions, early redemption rights to its investors according to the ELTIF's investment strategy. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. |
Overall income tax (corporate income tax and municipal business tax) | No income tax. | No income tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate: 23.87%. In certain cases, reduced corporate income tax rates may apply. Income derived from transferable securities (e.g. dividends received and capital gains realised on the sale of shares) is exempt. Income on cash held for the purpose of a future investment is also exempt (for one year). | No income tax, unless investing only in risk capital, then SICAR tax regime applicable. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate for taxable securisation companies: 23.87%. Securitisation vehicles should be able to deduct from their gross profits their operational costs and the dividends or interests distributed to the shareholders/creditors. Therefore securitisation companies should not generate significant taxable profits and should therefore to a large extent be tax neutral. | No corporate income tax applicable. Municipal business tax of 6.75% applicable in very limited circumstances, namely in case the SCS/SCSp (i) carries out a commercial activity or (ii) is deemed to carry out a commercial activity. A SCS/SCSp is deemed to carry out a commercial activity if its general partner is a Luxembourg public or private limited liability company holding at least 5% of the partnership interests. With a proper structuring of the GPs partnership interest it should be possible to avoid the deemed commercial characterisation of the SCS/SCSp. | General aggregate rate: 23.87%, but 100% exemption for dividends, liquidation proceeds and capital gains from qualifying participations. |
Subscription tax (NAV: net asset value) | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Tax exemptions: certain money market and pension funds or SIFs investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Exemptions apply. | Annual subscription tax of 0.25% on the amount of paid up capital and issue premium (if any). | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. |
Wealth tax | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | 0.5% on a taxable base of up to EUR 500 million. As of 1 January 2025, there is progressionve net wealth tax based solely on the company's total balance sheet size, regardless of asset composition: • €535 for companies with a total balance sheet up to and including €350,000 • €1,605 for companies with a total balance sheet between €350,001 and €2,000,000 • €4,815 for companies with a total balance sheet exceeding €2,000,000 |
Withholding tax on dividends | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Dividends distributed by a Luxembourg company are in principle subject to withholding tax at a rate of 15%, unless a domestic law exemption or a lower tax treaty rate applies. |
Benefit from Double Tax Treaty network | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | Yes in case the SICAR is set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). | • RAIFs investing in a portfolfio of risk capital (such as a SICAR) Access if set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). • RAIFs not investing in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR), but set-up as: SICAV / SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | No. | Yes for securitisation companies. | No. | Yes. |
Benefit from the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive | No. | No. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No. | In principle yes, but certain jurisdictions where the target companies are located may challenge the application of the directive. | No, unless RAIF that invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR). | No. | Yes. | No. | Yes. |
Thin capitalization rules (debt-toequity ratio) | Borrowings of up to 10% of net assets to finance redemptions (it should be a short term borrowing and cannot be for investment purposes) or to buy real estate for its business. The total borrowing under the above may not exceed 15% of net assets. | Borrowings of up to 25% of net assets without any restrictions are allowed. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the debt-to-equity ratio depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. Borrowings of cash of up to 50% of the NAV of the ELTIF marketed to retail investors and up to 100% for the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | Tax of 0.25% on the debt that exceeds 8 times the paid-up capital increased by the issue premium. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No provision in Luxembourg law. However, there is a specific administrative practice. |
10 How can we assist you?
Our team:
- supports you in finding the suitable vehicle to meet your requirements and your goals from a marketing, regulatory, legal and tax perspective;
- introduces you to the suitable service providers, including custodian banks, authorised AIFMs, fund administrators, registrar and transfer agents and auditors, to meet your requirements;
- provides assistance with the establishment of the (master) vehicle (i.e. drafting of the LPA, drafting and deposit of the extract of the LPA with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register, etc.), carried interest SCSp, co-investment SCSp and SPVs;
- provides corporate support services throughout the lifetime of your vehicle, including amendment of fund documents and restructurings;
- assists with the regulatory filing with the CSSF relating to the registration of the GP as external AIFM;
- review of side letters;
- provides advice on AIFMD-related issues;
- provides advice to sponsors on local private placement rules for marketing their vehicle in Luxembourg;
- keeps you up to date on new legal and regulatory developments.
A new legal landscape: A close look at Luxembourg's arbitration law reform
01 Introduction
On March 23, 2023, the Luxembourg Parliament approved a significant reform that modernises the Luxembourg arbitration law, with changes incorporated into the New Code of Civil Procedure. This revised and long-awaited law of 19 April 2023 was published in the Luxembourg Gazette, specifically in the Memorial A n° 203 / 2023.
On September 15, 2020, the Luxembourg government addressed the modernisation of the country’s arbitration law by tabling bill No. 7671 to the Chamber of Deputies. Since their incorporation in France’s Napoleonic-era Code of Civil Procedure of 1806, the Luxembourg rules relating to arbitration procedures have been modified only occasionally, with a major change in 1981 that notably updated the regime for appeals against awards. The current reform comes at the right time because the Grand-Duchy has manifest advantages as a hub for arbitration, in particular the favourable attitude of judges toward international law.
The modernisation of Luxembourg arbitration has multiple goals, not only to relieve the national courts of some cross-border disputes but also to make Luxembourg more attractive as a jurisdiction by providing parties access to legal expertise. Many operating companies, and holding entities have their headquarters in Luxembourg and incur additional costs when their disputes are heard in arbitration forums abroad. Additional risks arise when the legal advisers and judges in annulment proceedings are not specialists in Luxembourg law.
The legislation is inspired by French law and the model law of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL” model law), and seeks to provide liberal and arbitration-friendly provisions. Within the seven new chapters that will be integrated into Luxembourg’s New Code of Civil Procedure (NCPC), the law does not make a distinction between national and international arbitration.
Its principles are widely accepted in comparative law: they notably include a broad scope of whether disputes can be settled by arbitration, the absence of formalism for the arbitration agreement, the principle of autonomy of the arbitration clause, the positive and negative effect of the principle of competence-competence – whether a legal body has jurisdiction to rule on its own competence in matters before it – as well as the obligation of disclosure on the arbitrator (economic links with companies, former mandates, appointments as an arbitrator or as a lawyer of a party involved) in order to minimise the risk of conflicts of interest.
Nevertheless, the legislation innovates on certain points by comparison with French law, notably by introducing an obligation of confidentiality, sanctioned by the award of damages. It also strengthens the powers of the supporting judge and requires collaboration between the state judge and the arbitral tribunal to maximise the effectiveness of the arbitration proceedings.
The legislation also aims to extend the international jurisdiction of Luxembourg judges by giving them a jurisdictional head in the name of denial of justice. The arbitration award has the force of res judicata – a settled matter that may not be relitigated – regarding the dispute it resolves and must, unless otherwise agreed by the parties to the arbitration, include its reasoning.
Regarding recourse against the award, awards handed down in Luxembourg may be subject to an action for annulment on the basis of the new article 1238 of the NCPC, which lists seven grounds for annulment. Article 1243 adopts the revision system in French law, and article 1244 deals with third-party opposition. For awards delivered abroad, no annulment proceedings can be initiated before Luxembourg courts.
02Scope of eligibility for arbitration
Art. 1224. (1) All persons may compromise on rights which they freely dispose of:
(2) In particular, no arbitration may be entered into in respect of matters concerning the status and capacity of persons, the representation of incapable persons, the causes of action of such incapable persons and those of persons who are absent or presumed to be absent.
(3) The arbitral tribunal shall apply the rules of public policy.
Art. 1225. The following may not be submitted to arbitration: 1° disputes between professionals and consumers; 2° disputes between employers and employees; 3° disputes relating to residential leases. This prohibition remains applicable even after the end of the contractual relations referred to above.
The new article 1224 of the NCPC refers to the nature of the disputes that can be settled by arbitration, which excludes weaker parties who must be protected, as in consumer law. In labour law, the question of whether disputes relating to an employment contract shall not be settled by arbitration. Finally, disputes arising from bankruptcy proceedings cannot be adjudicated by an arbitral tribunal. However, the receiver of a company may, for example, conclude an arbitration agreement to settle a dispute with a debtor. Similarly, an arbitral tribunal may hear a dispute covered by an arbitration agreement stipulated in a contract that was to be performed before the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings.
03The arbitration agreement
Art. 1227. (1) An arbitration agreement is an agreement by which the parties decide to submit to arbitration all or some of the disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a particular legal relationship, whether contractual or not. It is not subject to any formality requirements.
(2) It may be concluded in the form of an arbitration clause or a compromise agreement. An arbitration clause is an agreement by which the parties to a contract undertake to submit to arbitration any disputes which may arise in connection with that contract. An arbitration agreement is an agreement by which the parties to a dispute submit it to arbitration.
The arbitration clause or arbitration agreement is not subject to any requirement regarding form; it can be concluded orally.
Art. 1227-2. The arbitral tribunal shall rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objection to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. For this purpose, an arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall be treated as an agreement separate from the other terms of the contract. It is not affected by the nullity, lapse or termination of the contract. The nullity of the arbitration clause does not imply the nullity of the contract.
The Luxembourg legislation enshrines the principle of competence-competence, which is universally accepted in comparative law. It also refers to the principles of severability and autonomy of the arbitration clause, by which the dispute resolution clause is independent of the main contract and is not affected by the defects of the latter or its possible nullity. The effect of such a provision is to protect the power of arbitrators to rule on their own jurisdiction in a matter to override delaying tactics.
Art. 1227-3. Where a dispute arising out of an arbitration agreement is brought before a state court, the latter shall declare that it lacks jurisdiction, unless the arbitration agreement is null and void due to the non-arbitrability of the case, or if it is manifestly null and void for any other reason. The state court may not declare of its own motion that it does not have jurisdiction. If the arbitral tribunal declares that it does not have jurisdiction, or if the arbitral award is set aside for a reason that precludes a resubmission to the arbitral tribunal, the case shall be continued before the court or tribunal originally seized as soon as the parties or one of them has notified the Registry and the other parties of the occurrence of the relevant event.
The new enacted legislation establishes the negative effect of the jurisdictional principle, which precludes judicial scrutiny of the enforceabilty of an arbitration agreement save for the case of its obvious and manifest nullity. The second element of the jurisdictional principle is the positive effect, under which the arbitrators must be the first (but not the only) judges of their own jurisdiction; the oversight of the Luxembourg judge is postponed to the stage of any action involving enforcement or annulment of the arbitration award made on the basis of the arbitration agreement.
When a dispute to be resolved by arbitration is addressed to a national court, it will decline jurisdiction only if one of the respondents invokes this exception, unless the arbitration agreement is manifestly null and void or unenforceable.
Art. 1227-4. As long as the arbitral tribunal has not yet been constituted or when it appears that an arbitral tribunal cannot grant the measure sought, the existence of an arbitration agreement does not prevent a party from bringing an action before a state court for the purpose of obtaining a measure of inquiry or an interim or protective measure. Such an application does not imply waiver of the arbitration agreement.
Before the constitution of the arbitral tribunal, only the state court may order urgent measures. Certain measures, such as garnishments, cannot be granted by an arbitral tribunal because of its lack of enforcement powers, in particular against third parties.
04The arbitral tribunal
Art. 1228. The parties are free to determine the seat of the arbitration or to delegate this determination to the person who may have been entrusted with organising the arbitration. Failing such determination, the seat shall be fixed by the arbitral tribunal, taking into account the circumstances of the case, including the convenience of the parties. The arbitration shall be deemed to take place at the seat of the arbitration, notwithstanding the possibility for the tribunal, unless otherwise agreed, to hold hearings, take evidence, sign decisions and meet at any place it deems appropriate. Arbitral decisions shall be deemed to have been rendered at the seat of the arbitration.
This article echoes the practice of delocalisation of arbitration: fixing the seat of the proceedings in Luxembourg does not necessarily require holding the hearings in Luxembourg. But by determining the seat of the arbitration, the parties agree on the place where the award is deemed to be made, which has a direct impact on remedies and review of the award.
Art. 1228-3. In the absence of agreement between the parties, any dispute relating to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal shall be settled by the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing that, by the supporting judge.
Art. 1228-4. If the parties fail to agree on the method of appointing an arbitrator, the procedure shall be as follows:
1° In the event of arbitration by a sole arbitrator, if the parties do not agree on the choice of arbitrator, the arbitrator shall be appointed by the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing this, by the supporting judge;
2° In the event of arbitration by three arbitrators, each party shall choose one arbitrator and the two arbitrators so chosen shall appoint the third arbitrator; if a party fails to choose an arbitrator within one month of receipt of the request to do so from the other party or if the two arbitrators fail to agree on the choice of the third arbitrator within one month of acceptance by the last arbitrator of his appointment, the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing this, the supporting judge shall make the appointment;
3° Where the dispute is between more than two parties and the parties are unable to agree on how the Arbitral Tribunal should be constituted, the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing this, the supporting judge, shall appoint the arbitrators;
4° All other disagreements relating to the appointment of the arbitrators shall likewise be settled by the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing this, the supporting judge.
As noted during the preparatory work on the draft legislation, the one-month period stipulated for a party to choose an arbitrator, after which the supporting judge may proceed to appoint them, seems more appropriate than the eight-day period provided for in the past.
Art. 1228-7. An arbitrator may only be challenged if there are circumstances likely to raise legitimate doubts as to his impartiality or independence, or if he does not possess the qualifications required by the parties. In the event of a dispute as to whether an arbitrator should be challenged, the difficulty shall be settled by the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing this, by the supporting judge, who shall refer the matter to the court within one month of the disclosure or discovery of the disputed fact to the court within a month of the disclosure or discovery of the contentious information.
This article imposes a disclosure obligation on arbitrators. This is a welcome provision in order to prevent potential conflicts of interest.
Art. 1228-8. The arbitrator may only be dismissed with the unanimous consent of the parties. Failing unanimity, the difficulty shall be settled by the person responsible for organising the arbitration or, failing that, by the supporting judge, who shall refer the matter to the court within one month of the disclosure or discovery of the disputed fact.
As regards the time limit for lodging an objection, the new law takes its inspiration from the French model by extending the period to one month, contrary to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law model legislation, which provides for a time limit of 15 days.
05The supporting judge
Art. 1229. The supporting judge in charge of the arbitration proceedings is the Luxembourg judge when the seat of the arbitration has been fixed in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, or, if the seat has not been fixed, when :
1° the parties have agreed to submit the arbitration to Luxembourg procedural law; or
2° the parties have expressly given jurisdiction to the Luxembourg courts to hear disputes relating to the arbitration proceedings; or 3° there is a significant link between the dispute and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
The Luxembourg supporting judge always has jurisdiction if one of the parties is exposed to a risk of denial of justice.
Article 1229 sets out four connecting factors and grounds for international jurisdiction of the Luxembourg judge in arbitration, primarily when the seat is located in Luxembourg. The other three criteria are alternative: by the will of the parties in choosing Luxembourg law as procedural law for the arbitration (lex curia); where there is a significant link between the dispute and Luxembourg, such as the place of performance of a disputed contract or the domicile of a defendant; or in the event of the risk of denial of justice.
06The arbitration proceedings
Art. 1231. The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance with the applicable rules of law. In international matters, the applicable rules are those chosen by the parties or, failing that, those that the Tribunal considers appropriate. The arbitral tribunal shall act as an amiable composition if the parties have asked it to do so.
According to the preparatory work on the legislation, “international matters” should be understood not with reference to the French definition of international arbitration, but according to the ordinary rules of private international law. The arbitrator(s) will be able to rule as in the capacity of an amiable compositeur – with the power to seek an equitable solution to the dispute, by setting aside if necessary the legal rules otherwise applicable or the strict application of a contract – offering opportunities for the renegotiation of contracts, for example.
Art. 1231-3. The arbitral tribunal shall always guarantee equality of the parties and respect of the adversarial principle.
This article provides for in Luxembourg arbitration law the principle of equality of opportunity to present one’s case and respect for the adversarial process. This principle must be applied in the light of Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights and may be applicable in particular in matters of clandestine evidence.
Art. 1231-5. In the absence of legal obligations to the contrary or unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitration proceedings shall be confidential.
This is one of the main advantages of the reform, which addresses the preference of economic players regarding business secrets or banking and financial transactions. It is specified in the preparatory work that this obligation will not invalidate the procedure and that breaches may be sanctioned by damages.
Art. 1231-6. If the arbitration agreement does not set a time limit, the duration of the mission of the arbitral tribunal shall be limited to six months from acceptance of the mission by the final arbitrator to do so. The legal or contractual time limit may be extended by agreement of the parties or by the person in charge of organising the arbitration if they have been authorised to do so by the parties, or, failing that, by the supporting judge.
Once the arbitrators accept their mission, the time limit for rendering an arbitration award is six months.
07The arbitration award
Article 1232. The deliberations of the arbitral tribunal shall be secret. The parties may, by a stipulation in the arbitration agreement or in the arbitration rules, authorise each of the arbitrators to append his separate or dissenting opinion to the arbitral award. The deliberations of the arbitral tribunal shall be secret. The parties may, by a stipulation in the arbitration agreement or in the arbitration rules, authorise each of the arbitrators to append his separate or dissenting opinion to the arbitral award.
Art. 1232-2. The arbitral award shall state the reasons on which it is based, unless the parties have dispensed the arbitral tribunal from stating the reasons.
Art. 1232-3. The arbitral award has the force of res judicata as soon as it is made. The arbitral tribunal shall deliver a signed copy of the award to each party. The award may be served by a party. The parties may, however, agree that this effect shall be attached to another method of service designated by them.
A.Enforcement of the award: arbitration awards handed down in luxembourg
Art. 1233. An arbitration award may be enforced only through an enforcement order issued by the president of the district court in whose jurisdiction the award was made. The procedure relating to application for enforcement is not adversarial. The application must be filed by the earliest party at the registry of the competent court together with the original or a copy of the award and the arbitration agreement. The claimant must elect domicile in the district of the court addressed. Service on the claimant relating to enforcement of the award or recourse may be carried out at the address elected. A copy of the award shall be attached to the enforcement order.
Under the new article 1233 of the NCPC, the judge of exequatur for awards made in Luxembourg is the president of the district court in whose jurisdiction the award was handed down, of Luxembourg or Diekirch. The exequatur order must state the court’s reasoning and may be appealed against under the new article 1235 of the code.
Art. 1238. An action for annulment is only available if:
1. The arbitral tribunal has wrongly declared itself competent or incompetent.
2. The arbitral tribunal has been improperly constituted.
3. The arbitral tribunal has ruled without compliance with its terms of reference.
4. The award is contrary to public policy.
5. The award does not state its reasoning unless the parties have dispensed with the need for the reasoning of the arbitrators.
6. There has been a violation of the rights of defence.
Article 1238 lists the six grounds for an annulment through an action for annulment (lack of jurisdiction of the court, the court was improperly constituted, the court ruled without complying with the terms of reference given by the parties, non-compliance with the adversarial process, infringement of public policy, failure to state reasons unless otherwise agreed by the parties, and violation of the rights of the defence).
The ground of failure to state reasons is expressed in a more flexible manner than in French law. Article 1241 provides that this recourse is not suspensive, but that the enforcement of the award may be adjusted by the Court of Appeal. Article 1243 adopts the revision system from French law and Article 1244 enshrines the third-party objection.
B.Enforcement of the award: arbitration awards handed down abroad
Only courts of the territory where the foreign award was made can rule on an appeal for annulment. However, if the award is the subject of an exequatur ruling in Luxembourg, it can be examined by the Luxembourg appeal court through an appeal against the exequatur decision. The exequatur ruling of an arbitration award handed down abroad can be refused inter alia on the same six grounds that apply to the annulment of awards delivered in Luxembourg as set out in the new article 1238. Other grounds are the fraud of one party, if the award was based on forged evidence or testimonials.
The introduction of a preventive action for unenforceability, which would have allowed a party to an award to take preventive action before the courts to avoid the award being granted exequatur, provided a sufficient interest would have been evidenced, was finally given up by the lawmaker.
08 Conclusion
The wide-ranging reform undertaken by the Luxembourg law-maker proposes a coherent regime of rules designed to promote efficient arbitration proceedings in Luxembourg that respect the fundamental rights of the parties choosing this mode of dispute resolution. It should be noted that the issue of the negative effect of the jurisdictional principle needs to be resolved. By introducing more flexibility and balancing the rules on arbitration agreements and proceedings, the objective remains to promote the integrity of the Luxembourg marketplace while ensuring the full effectiveness of awards.
09 Recent highlighted cases
Our specialized arbitration team has achieved significant successes in recent high-profile cases, demonstrating our expertise and dedication. Allow us to highlight two examples that underscore our capabilities:
1. We were involved in a highly intricate US$1 billion investment treaty claim against a European country. The case centered around the challenges encountered by a creditor in enforcing a commercial arbitration award across multiple jurisdictions, including England, Austria, and the Netherlands. Despite these difficulties, we successfully secured enforcement in Luxembourg and Belgium. For more details regarding this case, please find below the links to the official site of the PCA (Permanent Court of Arbitration) and UNCTAD’s Investment Policy Hub:
https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/213/
2. Enforcing a €500 Million Commercial Award: Our team effectively represented and assisted a creditor in enforcing a €500 million commercial award within Luxembourg, leveraging the provisions of the New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards. We achieved favorable outcomes at both the Court of Appeal (decision 55/17-VIII-exequatur) and the Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation 70/2018). The judgments for these decisions are publicly accessible online, underscoring our capability to handle high-stakes cases.
These cases exemplify our team’s adeptness in navigating complex arbitration landscapes and delivering favourable results. Whether you require assistance with an investment treaty claim or seek to enforce a commercial award, you can rely on our expertise to guide you towards a favourable outcome.
10 How our arbitration team can assist you?
As a leading Luxembourg law firm with a specialised focus on arbitration, we are uniquely positioned to guide and represent our clients in all aspects of the arbitration process. Our deep understanding of the recent reform of the Luxembourg arbitration law enables us to provide up-to-date, strategic advice tailored to the specific needs of each case. Here is how we can assist you:
- Arbitration Strategy Development: our seasoned team can assist in devising effective strategies for dispute resolution, considering all relevant legal, commercial, and practical aspects. We conduct a thorough analysis to advise on the most advantageous course of action – be it pursuing arbitration, litigation, negotiation, or other forms of alternative dispute resolution.
- Drafting and Reviewing Arbitration Agreements: we provide expert assistance in drafting arbitration clauses in commercial contracts, ensuring they are robust, clear, and enforceable. Moreover, we can review existing agreements and suggest modifications to optimise them in light of the latest legal changes and best practices.
- Representation in Arbitration Proceedings: from initiating the arbitration process to presenting the case and enforcing or challenging the award, our team is adept at handling the entire arbitration proceedings. We work diligently to protect our clients’ interests, focusing on achieving favourable outcomes while minimising risks and costs.
- Advisory Services: we provide timely advice on matters related to conflicts of interest, procedural issues, disclosure obligations, and the role of competence-competence principle under the new law reform.
- Confidentiality and Ethics: upholding the new obligation of confidentiality introduced in the reform, we ensure that all proceedings are handled with utmost discretion. We also adhere to the highest ethical standards and professionalism.
- International Arbitration: with the extensive experience in international law, our arbitration team is skilled at managing cross-border disputes. We navigate the complexities of international rules and jurisdictions to provide comprehensive support for global disputes.
At our firm, we understand that every dispute comes with its own set of challenges. That’s why we commit to a personalised approach, providing each client with a bespoke solution to meet their unique requirements. Whether you’re a multinational corporation or a local business, you can trust our team to provide exceptional service and expert guidance through the complexities of arbitration law.
Feel free to get in touch with us to learn more about how we can assist you in arbitration matters.
June 6, 2023
ELTIFs (European Long-Term Investment Funds) and Luxembourg ELTIF structures
00 Set-up a ELTIF in Luxembourg - summary of the main features
ELTIF | |
---|---|
Practical use | EU marketing label for long-term investment funds, private equity funds, infrastructure funds, debt funds, funds of funds, sustainable finance, debt funds, co-investments, securitisation, debt funds, investments in fintechs, real assets. |
Applicable legislation | Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds (“ELTIF Regulation”). The ELTIF Regulation has been amended on 15 March 2023 with significant changes which favour the fund market participants, fund financing and investors, in particular, the process of retailization and the amendments will apply from 10 January 2024. The ELTIF column has been drafted according to the amended ELTIF Regulation ("ELTIF 2 Regulation"). |
Authorisation and supervision by the CSSF | Yes. |
Qualification as an AIF | Always an AIF. |
Exemption from AIFMD full regime under lighter regime (AIFMD registration regime) | No. |
External authorised AIFM requirement | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed. Always an authorised EU AIFM. |
Eligible investors | Unrestricted. |
Eligible assets | Restricted to: - equity or quasi-equity instruments and debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking; -loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking with a maturity that does not exceed the life of the ELTIF, - units or shares of one or several other ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM provided that those ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs¸ UCITS and EU AIFs invest in eligible investments (this wording) and have not themselves invested more than 10% of their assets in any other UCI; - real assets; - certain STS securitisations (where the underlying exposures are residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial loans backed by mortgages on commercial immovable property, credit facilities, trade receivables and other underlying exposures; provided that, for the two last ones, the proceeds from the securitisation bonds are used for financing or refinancing long-term investments), - EU Green Bonds issued by a qualifying portfolio, and UCITS eligible assets. Qualifying portfolio undertaking is an undertaking that fulfils, at the time of the initial investment, the following requirements: - it is not a financial undertaking undertaking, unless it is a financial undertaking, other than a financial holding company or a mixed-activity holding company, that has been authorized or registered more recently than 5 years before the date of the investment (fintechs); - is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility; or is admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility and has a market capitalisation of no more than EUR 1 500 000 000; - it is established in a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country is not identified as high-risk third and is not mentioned in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax prusposes. ELTIFs are not allowed to: - short sell - take direct or indirect exposure to commodities; - enter into securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase transactions, or any other agreement which has an equivalent economic effect and poses similar risks, if more than 10 % of the assets of the ELTIF are affected; - use financial derivative instruments, except where the use of such instruments solely serves the purpose of hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF. |
Risk diversification requirements | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 13 and 17 of the ELITF Regulation (not exhaustive): ELTIFs marketed to retail investors shall not invest more than: - 20 % of its capital in instruments issued by, or loans granted to, any single qualifying portfolio undertaking; - 20 % of its capital in a single real asset; - 20 % of its capital in units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS, or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM; - 10 % of its capital in UCITS (liquid) assets where those assets have been issued by any single body; or 25 % where bonds are issued by a credit institution which has its registered office in a Member State and is subject by law to special public supervision designed to protect bond-holders; - The aggregate value of STS Securitisations in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 20% of the value of the capital of the ELTIF; - The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF. |
Legal Form | • FCP, SICAV and SICAF in various legal forms, Soparfis, SCS, SCSp, SCA and future forms entitling an AIF to be authorized as an ELTIF. In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF. |
Umbrella structure | Yes. Application for authorisation as ELTIF of one or more compartments may be submitted |
Capital requirements | As ELTIF is an EU label, the capital requirements applicable to an ELTIF are the capital requirements applicable to fund, in particular due to the national product law. |
Required service providers | • As ELTIF is an EU label, the required service providers for an ELTIF depend on the applicable national product law. • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. However, if the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, the Depositary shall comply with the UCITS depositary requirements and be a Depositary institution • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Other service providers required by the relevant product rules. |
Possibility of listing | Yes. |
European passport | Yes. |
Net asset value (NAV) calculation and redemption frequency | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. As ELTIF is an EU label, the NAV computation and redemption frequency depend on applicable national product law and the AIFM law. At least once a year for reporting purposes. Redemption frequency: In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF; - redemptions are limited to a percentage of the UCITS (liquid) assets of the ELTIF. An ELTIF may offer, under certain conditions, early redemption rights to its investors according to the ELTIF's investment strategy. |
Overall income tax (corporate income tax and municipal business tax) | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. |
Subscription tax (NAV: net asset value) | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. |
Wealth tax | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. |
Withholding tax on dividends | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. |
Benefit from Double Tax Treaty network | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. |
Benefit from the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. |
Thin capitalization rules (debt-toequity ratio) | As ELTIF is an EU label, the debt-to-equity ratio depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. Borrowings of cash of up to 50% of the NAV of the ELTIF marketed to retail investors and up to 100% for the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors. |
01 Introduction
On 19 May 2015, the EU published Regulation (EU) 2015/760 on European long-term investment funds to encourage and develop long-term finance, which is vital for boosting growth, employment, innovation and competitiveness. On 15 February 2023, the European Parliament passed the ELTIF 2 Regulation (the “ELTIF 2 Regulation” or “ELTIF 2 Regulation”) to revive ELTIFs and facilitate funds flowing towards the real economy, including green and digital priority areas. The ELTIF 2 Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the EU on 20 March 2023. The amendments provide for significant changes which favour the fund market participants, fund financing, investors, and, in particular, the process of retailization. The below references to the ELTIF Regulation shall be understood as references to the original ELTIF 1 Regulation as amended by the ELTIF 2 Regulation.
This publication presents ELTIFs and Luxembourg ELTIF structures. Indeed, Luxembourg is a competitive and efficient business location due to its flexibility, diversity and a broad range of services, skills, investors, and managers. The tools that have facilitated the exponential growth of the UCITSs in Luxembourg will also benefit the structuring of Luxembourg ELTIFs. This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ELTIF 2 Regulation.
The ELTIF 1 Regulation provides a product marketing passport to European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs). This means that EU alternative investment funds (AIFs) that fulfil the requirements of the ELTIF Regulation can use the ELTIF label, an EU-regulated label, for marketing purposes. As a result, ELTIFs can attract capital through marketing to institutional and retail investors in the EEA.
The ELTIF 2 Regulation will enter into force as of 9 April 2023 and shall apply as of 10 January 2024. As the authorization of an ELTIF is a thorough administrative process, we recommend preparing and setting up the AIF for an authorization pursuant to the ELTIF 2 Regulation. ELTIFs authorized and compliant with the ELTIF 1 Regulation before the 10th of January 2024 are deemed to comply with the ELTIF 2 Regulation until 11 January 2029. Also, such ELTIFs which do not raise additional capital are deemed to be compliant with the ELTIF 2 Regulation. ELTIFs authorized according to the ELTIF 1 Regulation may opt to apply the provisions of the ELTIF 2 Regulation before its effective date.
This publication is kept up-to-date and continuously reviewed. For clarity, see the List of abbreviations at the end.
02 Key features
-
Use of the ‘ELTIF’ and ‘European long-term investment fund’ labels
-
Marketing to both professional and retail investors across the EEA, facilitating retail investments in alternative assets
-
EU alternative investment fund (AIF) managed by an EU-authorized AIFM
-
Marketing to retail investors in several Member States without having to set up specific facilities in such Member States
-
Investments in real assets, qualifying portfolio undertaking (located in the EEA or certain third countries), UCITS liquid assets, certain STS securitisations, and EU Green Bonds
-
Appointment of a depositary and an auditor
- Particular portfolio composition, concentration, diversification, and borrowing limits
Several structuring options are available in Luxembourg, including funds-of-funds, master-feeder structures, co-investments, secondary market with matching requests for open-ended ELTIFs (subject to certain conditions), and internal or external management.
In general, it is important to note that the ELTIF regime allows an EU AIF managed by an authorized AIFM to use the ELTIF label for marketing and capital-raising purposes. The ELTIF Regulation is therefore a regulation overlayer and the AIFM and the relevant AIF must comply with the provisions of the ELTIF Regulation, the relevant implementing AIFM laws and regulations and any other product-level requirements. ELTIFs and their managers must comply at all times with the ELTIF Regulation and the AIFMD. The ELTIF manager is responsible and liable for compliance with the ELTIF Regulation and the AIFMD as implemented in the relevant Member State(s).
The ELTIF is a directly regulated product, and its AIFM must also be regulated, meaning authorized according to the AIFMD. The authorization granted to an EU AIF to be an ELTIF is valid for all Member States. ESMA keeps an up-to-date central public register of ELTIFs. Only an EU-authorized AIFM may apply for approval to manage an ELTIF. If the AIF is internally managed, such an AIF shall apply simultaneously for the ELTIF label and authorization as an AIFM. The approval of the EU AIFM is also subject to the fact it is duly authorized by its competent authority to manage EU AIFs that follow investment strategies covered by the ELTIF Regulation. An application rejected by the CSSF according to the ELTIF Regulation may not be resubmitted to any competent authorities of other Member States, and vice versa.
03 What changes does the ELTIF Regulation bring to fund structuring options?
ELTIF marks a significant development in long-term EU finance, as it provides the first EU marketing passport for long-term AIFs to retail investors. The ELTIF 2 Regulation offers new structuring options, such as master-feeder structures, funds-of-funds, and co-investments. It also allows compliant ELTIFs to invest in a broader scope of assets, including certain STS securitisations, EU Green Bonds, Fintechs, and real assets. Additionally, the ELTIF 2 Regulation provides more flexibility and liquidity for long-term AIFs labelled as ELTIF, with relaxed portfolio composition, diversification, concentration and leverage limits. This change is beneficial to retail investors. The ELTIF label, thanks to the ELTIF 2 Regulation, eases the redemption mechanism, as the ELTIF may be structured as open-ended with the lock-up of investors differentiated from the ramp-up period. Indeed, there are now two possibilities: i) the end of the lock-up period is the same date as the end of the ramp-up period or ii) the end of the lock-up period is another date, being the “end of a minimum holding period”. ESMA shall draft RTS specifying the criteria to determine such minimum holding period and submit them to the Commission by 10 January 2024. Therefore, the determination of the end of such a period is currently uncertain, which poses ambiguity. Closed-ended ELTIFs also benefit from the ELTIF 2 Regulation, with the possibility of full or partial matching of transfer requests of its units or shares by exiting ELTIF investors with transfer requests by potential investors, during the life of the ELTIF. These changes offer more options and greater flexibility for fund structuring in Luxembourg under the ELTIF regime.
05 What marketing rules apply to ELTIFs?
The marketing passport is the heart of the ELTIF Regulation. In fact, the main aim of the ELTIF Regulation is to enable alternative investment funds labelled as ELTIFs to be marketed to retail investors provided these funds meet the conditions of the ELTIF Regulation.
The manager of an ELTIF must be able to market the units or shares of that ELTIF to professional and retail investors in its home Member State and other states upon notification, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the AIFMD. The manager of an ELTIF shall, in respect of each ELTIF that it manages, specify to competent authorities whether it intends to market the ELTIF to retail investors and provide them with the relevant prospectus, as well as the PRIIP-KID(s) if the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors.
An internal assessment process is required for shares or units of ELTIFs marketed to retail investors. The manager of the ELTIF shall be subject to some MIFID 2 requirements in relation to the general principles and information to clients, as well as organizational requirements to ensure investor protection. The manager must ensure that the shares or units of the ELTIF marketed to retail investors are designed to meet the needs of an identified target market of end clients within the relevant category of clients. The strategy for the distribution of the financial instruments must be compatible with the identified target market, and the manager of the ELTIF must take reasonable steps to ensure that the shares or units of the ELTIF are distributed to the identified target market. Additionally, the manager of the ELTIF must operate and review a process for the approval of each ELTIF shares or units, as well as significant adaptations of existing ELTIF shares or units before they are marketed or distributed to clients. The product approval process must specify an identified target market of end clients within the relevant category of clients for each shares or units and ensure that all relevant risks to such an identified target market are assessed and that the intended distribution strategy is consistent with the identified target market. The manager of the ELTIF must also regularly review the shares or units of ELTIF it offers or markets, taking into account any event that could materially affect the potential risk to the identified target market, to assess whether they remain consistent with the needs of the identified target market and whether the intended distribution strategy remains appropriate. The manager of ELTIF must make, all appropriate information on the shares or units and the product approval process, including the identified target market of the financial instrument, available to any distributor. These policies, processes and arrangements shall be without prejudice to all other requirements under MiFID 2 and MIFIR, including those relating to disclosure, suitability or appropriateness, identification, and management of conflicts of interest, and inducements.
Marketing to retail investors involves additional requirements, particularly in relation to the depositary. The depositary of an ELTIF marketed to retail investors must be a UCITS depositary, as defined in the UCITS Directive. Such a depositary is not able to discharge itself of liability in the event of a loss of financial instruments held in custody by a third party. The depositary’s liability regarding its loss, or loss by a third party to whom the custody of financial instruments held in custody has been delegated, cannot be excluded or limited by agreement when the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors. The assets held in custody by the depositary of an ELTIF shall not be reused by the depositary, or by any third party to whom the custody function has been delegated, for their own account, but they may be reused on the ELTIF’s own account under certain conditions.
There are also additional requirements concerning the distribution and marketing of ELTIFs to retail investors. The units or shares of an ELTIF can only be marketed to a retail investor after an assessment of suitability has been carried out, and a statement on suitability has been communicated to the retail investor, in accordance with MiFID 2. The suitability assessment must be conducted regardless of whether the shares or units of ELTIFs are acquired by retail investors from an ELTIF manager, distributor or via the secondary market. Explicit consent from the retail investor, indicating that he or she understands the risks of investing in an ELTIF, is required where all following conditions are met: (i) the suitability assessment is not provided in the context of investment advice, (ii) the ELTIF is deemed unsuitable based on the suitability assessment, and (iii) the retail investor wishes to proceed with the transaction despite unsuitability of the ELTIF. A record, including the documents agreed upon with the investors that outlines the rights and obligations of the parties must be established by either the distributor or the ELTIF manager.
The distributor or the manager of the ELTIF must issue a clear, written alert to the retail investor concerning the following: (a) if the life of an ELTIF that is offered or placed to retail investors exceeds 10 years, the ELTIF may not be suitable for retail investors who cannot sustain such a long-term and illiquid commitment; (b) if the rules or instruments of incorporation of an ELTIF provide for the possibility of matching of units or shares of the ELTIF, as explained below, such matching possibility does not guarantee or entitle the retail investor to exit or redeem its units or shares of the ELTIF concerned.
Furthermore, during the subscription period and a period of two weeks after the signature of the initial commitment or subscription agreement of the units or shares of the ELTIF, retail investors should be able to cancel their subscription and have their money returned without penalty. The manager of an ELTIF marketed to retail investors must establish appropriate procedures and arrangements to handle retail investor complaints.
06 May a master-feeder structure be used with ELTIFs?
Yes, a Master-Feeder structure may be used by ELTIFs in Luxembourg. In the case of a master-feeder structure, the master ELTIF must provide the feeder ELTIF with all necessary documents and information for the latter to comply with the requirements laid down in the ELTIF Regulation. To this end, the feeder ELTIF must enter into an agreement with the master ELTIF. This agreement must be made available, free of charge, to all unit- or shareholders upon request. If both the master and feeder ELTIFs are managed by the same management company, the agreement may be replaced by internal rules on the conduct of business. If the master and feeder ELTIFs have different depositaries, these depositaries must enter into an information-sharing agreement to ensure that both depositaries fulfil their duties. The feeder ELTIF shall not invest in units or shares of the master ELTIF until such agreement has become effective. A feeder ELTIF must disclose in any marketing communications that it permanently invests 85% or more of its assets in units or shares of the master ELTIF.
When an ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, its manager must include a statement in the annual report of the feeder ELTIF on the aggregate charges of the feeder ELTIF and the master ELTIF. The annual report of the feeder ELTIF must indicate how the annual report or reports of the master ELTIF can be obtained.
07 Could ELTIFs offer preferential treatment to share classes aimed at retail investors?
No. The rules or instruments of incorporation of an ELTIF marketed to retail investors in the relevant class of units or shares shall provide that all investors benefit from equal treatment and that no preferential treatment or specific economic benefits are granted to individual investors or groups of investors within the relevant class or classes. It is important to note that this prohibition against preferential treatment only applies to share classes aimed at retail investors.
08 Can ELTIFs secure financing from the European Investment Bank?
The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the European Union’s bank and is owned by its member states. The EIB provides financing for projects that support EU policies, such as promoting sustainable growth, creating jobs, and improving infrastructure. The EIB can provide financing to private sector companies, public authorities, and financial intermediaries.
It is possible for Luxembourg ELTIFs to obtain financing from the EIB, as long as they meet the eligibility criteria, and the financing aligns with the EIB’s objectives. ELTIFs are a relatively new investment vehicle, and it is not clear how many ELTIFs have received financing from the EIB to date.
The European Commission aims to prioritize and streamline its application processes for ELTIFs seeking financing from the EIB.
09What investments may an ELTIF undertake?
To be authorized as an ELTIF, an EU AIF must invest only in eligible investment assets (as further described below) and assets commonly referred to as UCITS liquid assets in accordance with the ELTIF Regulation.
Eligible investment assets for ELTIFs are the following:
• Equity or quasi-equity instruments which have been issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking (as further developed below) and acquired by the ELTIF under certain conditions.
• Debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking.
• Loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking with a maturity that does not exceed the life of the ELTIF.
• Units or shares of one or several other ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM provided that those ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs invest in eligible investments have not themselves invested more than 10% of their assets in any other UCIs.
• Real assets, meaning assets having intrinsic value due to their substance and properties.
• STS securitisations with certain underlying exposures.
• Bonds issued, under Union legislation on environmentally sustainable bonds, by a qualifying portfolio undertaking.
However, ELTIFs shall not invest in an eligible investment asset in which the manager of the ELTIF has or takes a direct or indirect interest, other than by holding units or shares of the ELTIFs, EuSEFs, EuVECAs, UCITS or EU AIFs that it manages.
Co-investments are also permitted under certain conditions. The EU AIFM managing an ELTIF and undertakings that belong to the same group as an EU AIFM managing an ELTIF, and their staff may co-invest in that ELTIF and co-invest with the ELTIF in the same asset.
The following undertakings that fulfil, at the time of the initial investment, the following requirements are qualifying portfolio undertakings:
• An undertaking that is not a financial undertaking, unless it is one which is neither a financial holding company nor a mixed-activity holding company, and it has been authorized or registered more recently than 5 years before the date of the initial investment (Fintechs).
• An undertaking that is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or on an MTF or is admitted to trading on a regulated market or on an MTF and has a market capitalization of no more than EUR 1,500,000,000.
• The undertaking shall be established in a Member State or in a third country that is not identified as a high-risk third country and is not mentioned in Annex I to the Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.
ELTIFs may be structured as funds-of-funds. A financial undertaking that exclusively finances qualifying portfolio undertakings as explained above or real assets (as defined above) may be itself a qualifying portfolio undertaking.
ELTIFs shall not perform any of the following activities:
• Short selling of assets.
• Taking direct or indirect exposure to commodities, including via financial derivative instruments, certificates representing them, indices based on them or any other means or instrument that would give exposure to them.
• Entering into securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase transactions, or any other agreement which has an equivalent economic effect and poses similar risks, if thereby more than 10 % of the assets of the ELTIF are affected.
• Using financial derivative instruments, except where the use of such instruments solely serves the purpose of hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF.
10 What are the portfolio composition, diversification, concentration, and leverage restrictions applicable to ELTIFs?
ELTIFs must invest a minimum of 55 % of their capital in eligible investment assets. However, no more than 20 % of the capital may be invested in instruments issued by, or loans granted to, any single qualifying portfolio undertaking. Additionally, no more than 20 % of the capital may be invested in a single real asset. The limit is also 20 % for units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM and 10 % in UCITS liquid assets issued by any single body. Additionally, the aggregate value of STS securitisations shall not exceed 20 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF, and the aggregate risk exposure of the ELTIF to a counterparty stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF.
Certain of the above limits may be increased under certain conditions. Companies included in the same group for the purposes of consolidated accounts shall be considered as a single qualifying portfolio undertaking or a single body for the purpose of calculating such limits. This should be considered when making investments in third countries.
The above limits do not apply where ELTIFs are marketed solely to professional investors. Therefore, a practical solution may be to launch the ELTIF being first marketed to professional investors, in particular considering a ramp-up period, and then complying with such limits when requesting the marketing of the ELTIF to retail investors. The limit of 20 % of the capital in units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM does not apply to feeder ELTIF.
The above-mentioned portfolio composition and diversification requirements shall:
• apply by the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation of the ELTIF taking into account the particular features of the assets to be invested by the ELTIF, and shall be no later than the earlier between five years after the date of the authorisation as an ELTIF, and half the life of the ELTIF (one additional year may be granted by the competent authority of the ELTIF);
• cease to apply once the ELTIF starts to sell assets in order to redeem investors’ units or shares after the end of the life of the ELTIF; and
• be temporarily suspended where the ELTIF raises additional capital or reduces its existing capital, so long as such a suspension lasts no longer than 12 months.
When the issuing qualifying portfolio undertaking in which the ELTIF has invested does not meet certain conditions of the definition of qualifying portfolio undertaking anymore, the long-term assets issued by such an undertaking and owned by the ELTIF continue to be counted for the 55 % limit for a maximum of three years.
The concentration and leverage in the form of cash borrowing are also restricted. An ELTIF may acquire no more than 30 % of the units or shares of a single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS or of an EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM. The concentration limit does not apply to a feeder ELTIF investing in its master ELTIF. Regarding the UCITS liquid assets, an ELTIF may acquire no more than i) 10 % of the non-voting shares of a single issuing body, ii) 10 % of the debt securities of a single issuing body, iii) 25 % of the units of a single UCITS, v) 10 % of the money market instruments of a single issuing body. These limits over the UCITS liquid assets may be disregarded at the time of acquisition if at that time the gross amount of the debt securities or of the money market instruments, or the net amount of the securities in issue, cannot be calculated.
The fact that these two concentration limits do not apply to ELTIFs marketed solely to professional investors increases the usefulness of the above-mentioned structure option: first launching the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors, in particular considering a ramp-up period, and then complying with the limits to market the ELTIF to retail investors.
The limits applying to the borrowing of cash are the following:
(a) it represents no more than 50 % of the NAV of the ELTIF that can be marketed to retail investors, and no more than 100 % of the NAV of the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors;
(b) it serves the purpose of making investments or providing liquidity, including to pay costs and expenses provided that the holdings in cash or cash equivalents of the ELTIF are not sufficient in this respect;
(c) it is contracted in the same currency as the assets to be acquired with the borrowed cash, or in another currency where currency exposure has been appropriately hedged; and
(d) it has a maturity no longer than the life of the ELTIF.
The ELTIF may encumber assets to borrow cash. However, borrowing arrangements that are fully covered by investors’ capital commitments shall not be considered to constitute borrowing for leverage purposes. The borrowing limits to be inserted in the prospectus of the ELTIF shall only apply from the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation of the ELTIF, and the date shall not be later than three years after the start of the marketing of the fund. The above-mentioned borrowing limit in point a) shall be temporarily suspended where the ELTIF raises additional capital or reduces its existing capital. Such suspension is limited to the period that is strictly necessary, taking due account of the interests of the investors and, in any case, shall not last longer than 12 months.
11 What documentations and reporting requirements must an ELTIF comply with?
ELTIFs in Luxembourg must publish a prospectus prior to marketing their units or shares in the Union. If the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors in the Union, a PRIIP-KID must be published before such marketing.
The prospectus of the ELTIF shall contain at least the following:
(a) a statement setting out how the ELTIF’s investment objectives and strategy for achieving these objectives qualify the fund as long-term in nature;
(b) information to be disclosed by collective investment undertakings of the closed-end type in accordance with the Prospectus Regulation;
(c) disclosures to investors required under Article 23 of the AIFMD;
(d) a prominent indication of the categories of assets in which the ELTIF is authorized to invest;
(e) a prominent indication of the jurisdictions in which the ELTIF is allowed to invest;
(f) any other information considered by the competent authorities to be relevant to enable investors to make an informed assessment regarding the investment proposed to them and, in particular, the risks attached thereto;
(g) whether or not the ELTIF intend to borrow cash for its investment strategy and the borrowing limits.
Further requirements apply to the prospectus of a feeder ELTIF.
Regarding the information to investors about the illiquid nature of the ELTIF, the prospectus and any other marketing documents shall clearly:
(a) inform investors about the long-term nature of ELTIF’s investments;
(b) inform investors about the end of the life of the ELTIF as well as the option to extend the life of the ELTIF, where this is provided for, and the conditions thereof;
(c) state whether the ELTIF is intended to be marketed to retail investors;
(d) explain the rights of investors to redeem their investment;
(e) state the frequency and the timing of distributions of proceeds, if any, to investors during the life of the ELTIF;
(f) advise investors that only a small proportion of their overall investment portfolio should be invested in an ELTIF;
(g) describe the hedging policy of the ELTIF, including a prominent indication that financial derivative instruments may be used only for the purpose of hedging risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF, and an indication of the possible impact of the use of financial derivative instruments on the risk profile of the ELTIF;
(h) inform investors about the risks related to investing in real assets, including infrastructure;
(i) inform investors regularly, at least once a year, of the jurisdictions in which the ELTIF has invested.
The prospectus shall prominently inform investors of the level of the different costs borne directly or indirectly by the investors. The different costs shall be disclosed according to the following headings:
(a) setting up costs;
(b) assets acquisition costs;
(c) management and performance-related fees;
(d) distribution costs;
(e) other costs, including administrative, regulatory, depositary, custodial, professional service and audit costs.
The prospectus shall also disclose the overall cost ratio of the ELTIF.
The annual report of the ELTIFs must contain disclosures required under the AIFMD, as well as a cash flow statement, information on any participation in instruments involving Union budgetary funds, the value of the individual qualifying portfolio undertakings, and other assets in which the ELTIF has invested, including financial derivative instruments, and the jurisdictions in which the assets of the ELTIF are located.
A retail investor may request additional information from the manager of the ELTIF relating to the risk management quantitative limits, methods chosen for that end, and the recent evolution of the main risks and yields of the relevant categories of assets.
The prospectus and any amendments thereto, as well as the annual report, must be sent to the CSSF. The competent authority of the manager of the ELTIF may request to receive such documentation as well when such authority is not the CSSF. It should be noted that a Luxembourg ELTIF may be managed by an AIFM in another Member State.
04 What regulatory oversight is an ELTIF subject to?
ELTIFs are EU-regulated AIFs managed by an authorised EU AIFM in compliance with the AIFMD and the ELTIF Regulation. Luxembourg ELTIFs are subject to supervision and oversight by the CSSF, as well as the managers of Luxembourg ELTIFs. To ensure the compliance of ELTIFs with the harmonised rules governing their activities, the harmonised authorisation and supervision procedures for AIFMs have been supplemented with a special authorisation procedure for ELTIFs.
To obtain authorisation as an ELTIF, an AIF must be managed by an authorised EU AIFM and comply with all the requirements outlined in the ELTIF Regulation. The application process differs depending on whether the applicant is already constituted, authorised as a regulated Luxembourg AIF, internally managed or externally managed, and whether it intends to submit a SIF, SICAR or Part II UCI application to the CSSF. If it is intended that the applicant will market the ELTIF to retail investors, the relevant PRIIP-KID(s) should be enclosed with the application. The AML/CFT Market Entry Form should also be filed with the CSSF on Edesk. If the applicant is not a SIF, SICAR or Part II UCI, the fund rules or instruments of incorporation, the identity of the depositary and the prospectus should be included in the application. The applicant must also undertake to send the prospectus, any amendment thereto, and annual reports in due time to the CSSF.
Furthermore, the applicant must disclose information regarding the AIFM identity and the potential investors to the CSSF. The information to be disclosed by the applicant AIFM depends on whether the AIFM is based in Luxembourg or another Member State. A Luxembourg AIFM that is not already authorised by the CSSF or did not submit a request to the CSSF shall complete the application questionnaire for authorisation as AIFM. The applicant AIFM shall either refer to or submit the agreement with the depositary, information on delegation arrangements regarding portfolio and risk management and administration regarding the ELTIF, and information about the investment strategies, the risk profile, and other characteristics of the relevant AIFs. For clarity purposes, attention should be drawn to the fact that for AIFM authorised as such in another Member State than Luxembourg, the CSSF is competent to grant the authorisation to manage the relevant ELTIF. The competent authority for the AIFM authorisation of the potential manager of the ELTIF is the competent authority of its home Member State.
Luxembourg AIFMs marketing ELTIFs in Luxembourg or another Member State in accordance with the ELTIF Regulation must submit a notification to the CSSF. The practicalities of the notification procedure are described in CSSF Circular 22/810.
12What are the rules applying to ELTIFs regarding redemption, trading and the issue of their units or shares?
Investors in an ELTIF may not request the redemption of their units or shares prior to the end of the ELTIF’s life, except in certain circumstances outlined below. The rules or instruments of incorporation of the ELTIF must specify a specific date for the end of the life of the ELTIF and may provide for the right to extend temporarily the life of the ELTIF and the conditions for exercising such a right. The procedures for redemption of units or shares and the disposal of assets must be clearly specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation, with disclosures to investors clearly stating that redemptions will begin on the day following the end of the ELTIF’s life.
Under certain conditions, investors may request redemptions during the ELTIF’s life. In particular, the manager of the ELTIF must demonstrate to the CSSF that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs which are compatible with its long-term investment strategy. Redemptions may not be granted before the end of a minimum holding period or the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation relating to portfolio composition and diversification requirements. The condition of a minimum holding period does not apply to a feeder ELTIF investing in its master ELTIF.
In any case, the life of an ELTIF shall be consistent with its long-term nature and shall be compatible with its stated investment objective, the life-cycle of each of its individual assets measured according to the illiquidity profile and the economic life-cycle of the asset.
Regarding the secondary market of shares or units of ELTIF, such shares or units may be admitted to trading on a regulated market or on an MTF. The rules or instruments of incorporation of an ELTIF shall not prevent investors from freely transferring their units or shares to third parties other than the manager of the ELTIF, according to the applicable regulatory requirements and the conditions set out in its prospectus.
The rules or instruments of incorporation may provide for the possibility of full or partial matching, during their life, of transfer requests by exiting investors with transfer requests by potential investors. In this regard, the manager of the ELTIF shall set out a policy and procedures, such policy and procedures ensuring that investors are treated fairly and that matching is carried out on a pro-rata basis where there is a mismatch between exiting and potential investors. In addition to such requirements, the matching of requests shall allow the manager of the ELTIF to monitor the liquidity risk and be compatible with the long-term investment strategy of the ELTIF.
The market value of listed ELTIF units or shares must be published along with the NAV per unit or share in periodical reports. Material changes in the value of assets must also be disclosed to investors.
New issuances of ELTIF units or shares must be offered in accordance with its rules or instruments of incorporation. If new shares or units are issued at a price below their NAV, existing investors in the ELTIF shall benefit from a prior offering of such units or shares.
An ELTIF shall inform the CSSF of the orderly disposal of its assets in order to redeem investors’ units or shares after the end of its life, at the latest one year before the date of the end of its life. The CSSF may require submitting an itemised schedule for the orderly disposal of its assets. The schedule shall include: i) an assessment of the market for potential buyers, ii) an assessment and comparison of potential sales prices, iii) a valuation of the assets to be divested, and iv) a timeframe for the disposal schedule.
13 What are the distribution rules applying to ELTIFs?
Investors in an ELTIF have the option to be repaid in cash at all times. Repayment in kind from the assets of an ELTIF is only possible when the following conditions are met:
• the ELTIF’s rules or instruments of incorporation allow this possibility, provided that all investors are treated fairly;
• the investor submits a written request for such repayment;
• there are no specific restrictions on the transfer of those assets (e.g. civil or contractual rules).
ELTIFs may regularly distribute to investors the proceeds generated by the assets held in their portfolio. These proceeds consist of proceeds regularly produced by the assets and capital appreciation realised after the disposal of an asset. However, distribution of the proceeds shall not take place when they are required for future commitments. In the event of disposal of an asset during the ELTIF’s life, the ELTIF may reduce its capital on a pro-rata basis, provided that such disposal is deemed to be in the investors’ interests. The ELTIF’s rules or instruments of incorporation must specify the distribution policy that the ELTIF will apply during its life.
14 What legal forms and regimes may an ELTIF adopt?
All vehicles that meet the criteria of AIFs under the AIFM Law and vehicles regulated by Part II of the UCI Law are eligible to be used as ELTIFs in Luxembourg. Therefore, Luxembourg provides a favourable environment to establish ELTIFs due to its flexible and diverse structuring options.
The legal forms available in Luxembourg for AIFs include, but are not limited to:
• Companies (such as SICAV or SICAF in various legal forms, and Soparfis);
• Mutual funds (FCP);
• Partnerships (SCS, SCSp, and SCA).
If an ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, its legal form must not result in any further liability for the retail investor or require any additional commitments on behalf of the investor, apart from the initial capital commitment.
An AIF that is not regulated by any Luxembourg fund-product laws may also apply for authorisation as ELTIF provided that it complies with all the requirements specified in the ELTIF Regulation.
Therefore, a Part II UCI, a SIF, a SICAR, or an unregulated structure, such as SCS or SCSp, can be established as an ELTIF.
A securitization vehicle that is also an AIF under the AIFM law can be an ELTIF, provided it complies with the provisions of the ELTIF Regulation.
Regarding the creation of the ELTIF, if any fund-level regulation applies to the AIF, the AIF is structured according to its national special regime. The provisions of the ELTIF Regulation must also be considered during the setup process.
15 May ELTIFs have multiple compartments and share classes?
ELTIFs are allowed to have compartments and share classes as long as they are in accordance with the articles of incorporation and the regulatory framework applicable to the AIF. Additionally, the ELTIF designation can apply to one or more compartments of an umbrella fund without requiring the entire fund to comply with the ELTIF Regulation. If an ELTIF has multiple compartments, each compliant with the ELTIF Regulation, then each compartment should be treated as a separate ELTIF. In case where only one or some of the compartments of an umbrella AIF are authorised as ELTIFs, the authorisation applies strictly to those specific compartment(s).
16 Who may invest in an ELTIF?
Retail investors, institutional investors, and professional investors in the EEA, as well as investors in third countries, are eligible to invest in Luxembourg ELTIFs. Professional investors are investors considered to be professional clients, or may, on request, be treated as professional clients in accordance with Annex II of MiFID II. The retail investor notion is negatively defined, as retail investors are non-professional investors. Marketing to retail investors requires a suitability test, the issuance of a suitability statement and compliance with the product governance requirements of the ELTIF 2 Regulation in line with MiFID II. It is important to note that retail investors may cancel their subscription and have their money returned without penalty during the subscription period and for two weeks after the initial commitment or subscription agreement for the units or shares of the ELTIF has been signed. The AML/CFT process must be carried out in accordance with the AML/CFT Law.
17What taxation is an ELTIF subject to?
ELTIF is an EU marketing label without any direct tax implications as the ELTIF Regulation does not provide for any tax rules. The tax treatment of an ELTIF depends on the legal form of the ELTIF and the rules related to the AIF. For example, the Luxembourg subscription tax rate applicable to an ELTIF Part II UCI may be reduced based on the proportion of the portfolio invested in certain Taxonomy-aligned investments but not in accordance with the ELTIF Regulation. The ELTIF may benefit from double-tax treaties, depending on the regulatory regime applicable to the AIF.
Luxembourg may consider the implementation of a special national ELTIF tax regime to further promote the development of the ELTIF market in Luxembourg.
18 What is the practical use of an ELTIF?
The ELTIF label provides an avenue for long-term investment AIFs to attract funding for the real economy and promote the AIF to both professional and retail investors, subject to relevant requirements. The use of ELTIFs promotes diversification for both retail and institutional investors. Additionally, the ELTIF label may facilitate access to private financings, such as from the EIB, and enable the combination of private and public investments in eligible long-term assets.
19 Glossary
Amending regulation or ELTIF 2 Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2023/606 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 amending ELTIF 1 Regulation. It shall apply as of 10 January 2024.
AIF: Alternative Investment Fund as defined by article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law, namely collective investment undertakings, including investment compartments thereof, which (a) raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors; and (b) do not require authorization pursuant to article 5 of Directive 2009/65/EC (i.e. UCITS).
AIFMD: Directive 2011/61/EU on alternative investment fund managers.
AIFMD registration regime: An AIFM that wishes to make use of the registration regime must have assets under management of less than EUR 100 million, or EUR 500 million if it manages only funds closed for at least 5 years not using leverage.
AIFM: A legal person whose regular business is managing one or more AIFs.
AIFM Law: Luxembourg law of 12 July 2013 on alternative investment fund managers (transposing the AIFM directive into Luxembourg law).
CSSF: The Luxembourg Supervisory Authority of the Financial Sector (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier).
Company Law: The Luxembourg law of 10th August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended from time to time.
EEA: European Economic Area
EIB: European Investment Bank
ELTIF: European Long Term Investment Fund
ELTIF 1 Regulation or ELTIF Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds.
FCP: Common fund (fonds commun de placement).
MIFID II: Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU.
MIFIR: Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments as amended from time to time.
Multilateral trading facility (MTF): Multilateral system, operated by an investment firm or a market operator, which brings together multiple third-party buying and selling interests in financial instruments – in the system and in accordance with non-discretionary rules – in a way that results in a contract.
Part II UCI: Undertaking for collective investment established under Part II of the Luxembourg law of 17 December 2010.
PRIIP Regulation: Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament an of the Council of 26 November 2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) as amended from time to time.
PRIIP-KID: Key investor document according to the PRIIP Regulation.
Prospectus Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market, and repealing Directive 2003/71/EC.
RAIF: Reserved alternative investment fund (fonds d’investissement alternatif réservé).
RAIF Law: Law of 23 July 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds as amended from time to time.
S.A.: Public limited liability company (société anonyme).
S.à r.l.: Private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée).
SAS: Simplified stock company (société par actions simplifiée).
S.C.A.: Corporate partnership limited by shares (société en commandite par actions).
SCoSA: Cooperative company organised as a public limited company (société cooperative organisée comme une société anonyme).
SCS: Common limited partnership (société en commandite simple).
SCSp : Special limited partnership (société en commandite spéciale).
SICAF: Investment company with fixed capital (société d’investissement à capital fixe).
SICAR: Investment company in risk capital (société d’investissement en capital à risqué).
SICAV: Investment company with variable capital (société d’investissement à capital variable).
SIF: Specialised investment fund (fonds d’investissement spécialisé).
UCI Law: Law ofr 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment as amended from time to time.
Well-informed investors: A well-informed investor is an institutional investor, a professional investor or any other investor who has stated in writing that s/he adheres to the status of well-informed investor and invests a minimum of 125,000 Euro in the SIF/SICAR/RAIF, as applicable, or has been subject of an assessment made by a credit institution, by an investment firm or by a management company certifying his/her expertise, his/her experience and his/her knowledge to adequately appraise an investment in the SIF/SICAR/RAIF, as applicable.
20 How can we assist you?
Our investment management team:
- Supports you in finding the suitable investment vehicle to meet your requirements and your goals from a marketing, regulatory, legal and tax perspective.
- Introduces you to the suitable service providers to meet your requirements (i.e., custodian bank, AIFM, administrative agent, registrar and transfer agent and auditor).
- Provides assistance with the establishment of the fund (i.e., drafting of the PPM, assistance with the incorporation of the fund and its general partner and regulatory filings with the CSSF).
- Provides assistance with respect to the migration of offshore funds into Luxembourg funds.
- Provides corporate support services throughout the lifetime of your fund (i.e., amendment of fund documents, restructuring, launching or closing sub-funds, etc.).
- Provides assistance with changing of service providers including custodian bank, fund administrator, auditor or registrar and transfer agent).
- Provides assistance with the listing of the units of the fund on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated or EURO MTF markets.
- Provides support in the registration of the fund in other jurisdictions (in cooperation with local service providers).
- Provides advice on AIFMD-related issues.
- Provides advice to fund promoters on local private placement rules for marketing their funds in Luxembourg.
- Keeps you up to date on new legal and regulatory developments.
21 Compare Luxembourg vehicles
Compare two vehicles:
UCITS | Part II UCI | ELTIF | SIF | SICAR | RAIF | SPF | Securitisation vehicle | Unregulated SCS/SCSp | Ordinary Luxembourg company | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practical use | Highly regulated vehicle which can be sold through a EU passport to all types of investors (such as retail investors, professional investors, institutional investors). | Investment funds which could be used for investment strategies that do not meet the criteria set by the UCITS directives. | EU marketing label for long-term investment funds, private equity funds, infrastructure funds, debt funds, funds of funds, sustainable finance, debt funds, co-investments, securitisation, debt funds, investments in fintechs, real assets. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Private equity and venture capital transactions. | Hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, distressed debt funds, Islamic finance funds, microfinance funds, socially responsible investment funds, tangible assets funds and any other type of alternative funds. | Individuals wishing to optimise their personal tax planning (private wealth management purposes). | • True sale and synthetic securitisations. • Securitisation of a portfolio of securities. • Securitisation as structure for intra group financing activities. • Securitisation of non-performing loans. • Securitisation of leasing receivables. • Securitisation of both tangible and intangible assets. • CLOs (possibility of active management). | Private equity, venture capital and real estate investments and any other alternative investments. | Holding and financing activity, commercial activity, holding of IP, etc. |
Applicable legislation | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part I (“UCITS Law”). | Law of 17 December 2010 - Part II (“UCI Law”). | Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds (“ELTIF Regulation”). The ELTIF Regulation has been amended on 15 March 2023 with significant changes which favour the fund market participants, fund financing and investors, in particular, the process of retailization and the amendments will apply from 10 January 2024. The ELTIF column has been drafted according to the amended ELTIF Regulation ("ELTIF 2 Regulation"). | Law of 13 February 2007 (“SIF Law”). | Law of 15 June 2004 (“SICAR Law”). | Law of 23 July 2016 (“RAIF Law”). | Law of 11 May 2007 (“SPF Law”). | Law of 22 March 2004 (“Securitisation Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). | Law of 10 August 1915 (“Company Law”). |
Authorisation and supervision by the CSSF | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Non. | Non. | No, unless issue on a continuous basis of financial instruments offered to the public. The securitisation vehicle issues on a continuous basis when it carries out more than three issuances of financial instruments offered to the public during the financial year. All the issuances by the compartments should be added up. The issuance of financial instruments is offered to the public when it is not intended for professional clients, the denominations are less than 100,000 euros and it is not distributed as private placement. | Non. | Non. |
Qualification as an AIF | No. | Always an AIF. | Always an AIF. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Yes, unless exempt. It is exempt if it does not raise capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors. | Always an AIF. | In principle, no (as it would not be considered as “raising” capital from a number of investors as the structure generally serves for the investment of the private wealth of a “pre-existing group” (as defined in the Esma guidelines on key concepts of the AIFMD)). | No, in case • such vehicle meets the definition of “securitisation special purpose vehicle ” under the AIFM Law; • it issues collateralised debt obligations; • it only issues debt instruments; • such entity is not managed according to an investment policy within the meaning of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. | Non-AIF, unless activities fall within the scope of article 1 (39) of the AIFM Law. |
Exemption from AIFMD full regime under lighter regime (AIFMD registration regime) | Not applicable. | Possible. | No. | Possible. | Possible. | No. | Not applicable. | Possible. | Possible. | Possible. |
External authorised AIFM requirement | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed. Always an authorised EU AIFM. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Always required. | Not applicable. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. | Required in case the entity is an AIF that is not self-managed and above the AIFMD threshold. |
Eligible investors | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Well-informed investors. | Restricted to: • natural persons acting in the context of the management of their personal wealth; • management entities acting solely in the interest of the private wealth (e.g. trusts, private foundations); and intermediaries acting for the account of the above mentioned eligible investors (e.g. bank acting under a fiduciary agreement). | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Eligible assets | Restricted to transferable securities admitted or dealt on a regulated market, investment funds, financial derivative instruments, cash and money market instruments that are in compliance with article 41 of the Ucits law and the relevant EU directives and regulations. Please note that the eligibility of the asset must be ascertained on a case-by-case basis in view of the applicable laws and regulatory practice. | Unrestricted. The investment objective and strategy of the fund is subject to the prior approval of the CSSF. | Restricted to: - equity or quasi-equity instruments and debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking; -loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking with a maturity that does not exceed the life of the ELTIF, - units or shares of one or several other ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM provided that those ELTIFs, EuVECAs, EuSEFs¸ UCITS and EU AIFs invest in eligible investments (this wording) and have not themselves invested more than 10% of their assets in any other UCI; - real assets; - certain STS securitisations (where the underlying exposures are residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial loans backed by mortgages on commercial immovable property, credit facilities, trade receivables and other underlying exposures; provided that, for the two last ones, the proceeds from the securitisation bonds are used for financing or refinancing long-term investments), - EU Green Bonds issued by a qualifying portfolio, and UCITS eligible assets. Qualifying portfolio undertaking is an undertaking that fulfils, at the time of the initial investment, the following requirements: - it is not a financial undertaking undertaking, unless it is a financial undertaking, other than a financial holding company or a mixed-activity holding company, that has been authorized or registered more recently than 5 years before the date of the investment (fintechs); - is not admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility; or is admitted to trading on a regulated market or on a multilateral trading facility and has a market capitalisation of no more than EUR 1 500 000 000; - it is established in a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country is not identified as high-risk third and is not mentioned in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax prusposes. ELTIFs are not allowed to: - short sell - take direct or indirect exposure to commodities; - enter into securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase transactions, or any other agreement which has an equivalent economic effect and poses similar risks, if more than 10 % of the assets of the ELTIF are affected; - use financial derivative instruments, except where the use of such instruments solely serves the purpose of hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF. | Unrestricted. | Restricted to investments in securities representing risk capital. According to the CSSF Circular 06/241, investment in risk capital is to be understood as the direct or indirect contribution of assets to entities in view of their launch, their development or their listing on a stock exchange. The SICAR is not allowed to invest directly in real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted, unless it invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a Sicar). | Restricted to acquisition, detention, management and realisation of financial assets. The SPF is not allowed to carry out commercial activities or to hold directly real estate (except for its own use or through its participations). | Unrestricted. The securitisation vehicle may acquire or assume, directly or through another undertaking, risks relating to claims, other assets, or obligations assumed by third parties or inherent to all or part of the activities of third parties and issues financial instruments or contracts, for all or part of it, any type of loan, whose value or yield depends on such risks. | Unrestricted. | Unrestricted. |
Risk diversification requirements | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 42 et seq. of the UCITS Law, e.g. (not exhaustive): • a UCITS may not invest more than 10% of its assets in transferable securities or money market instruments issued by the same body; • a UCITS may not invest more than 20% of its net assets in deposits made with the same body; • the global exposure relating to derivative instruments does not exceed the total net value of the UCITS portfolio. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by IML Circular 91/75 (as amended by CSSF Circular n° 05/177). Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS. In particular, a UCI is not allowed to invest more than 20% of its net assets in securities issued by any one issuer. Specific restrictions concerning funds adopting an alternative investment strategy are contained in CSSF Circular n° 02/80. | Risk diversification requirements are provided by articles 13 and 17 of the ELITF Regulation (not exhaustive): ELTIFs marketed to retail investors shall not invest more than: - 20 % of its capital in instruments issued by, or loans granted to, any single qualifying portfolio undertaking; - 20 % of its capital in a single real asset; - 20 % of its capital in units or shares of any single ELTIF, EuVECA, EuSEF, UCITS, or EU AIF managed by an EU AIFM; - 10 % of its capital in UCITS (liquid) assets where those assets have been issued by any single body; or 25 % where bonds are issued by a credit institution which has its registered office in a Member State and is subject by law to special public supervision designed to protect bond-holders; - The aggregate value of STS Securitisations in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 20% of the value of the capital of the ELTIF; - The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF. | Risk diversification requirements are defined by CSSF Circular n° 07/309. Such requirements are less stringent than the ones applicable to UCITS and UCI. In particular, a SIF is not allowed to invest more than 30% of its net assets in securities of the same type issued by the same issuer. | No risk diversification requirements. | Risk diversification requirements are aligned with those applicable to SIFs, unless the RAIF chooses to invest in risk capital only and such choice is mentioned in its constitutive documents. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. | No risk diversification requirements. |
Legal Form | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA,SCA) All of these entities must be open-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP, SICAV and SICAF in various legal forms, Soparfis, SCS, SCSp, SCA and future forms entitling an AIF to be authorized as an ELTIF. In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCS • SCSp • SCoSA The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • FCP • SICAV (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) • SICAF (SA, Sàrl, SCA, SCoSA, SCS, SCSp) The entities may be open-ended or closed-ended. | • SA • Sàrl • SCA • SCSA | A securitisation vehicle may be set up in one of the following forms: • a securitisation company (SA, Sàrl, SCS, SCSp, SENC, SCA, SAS, SCSA); or • a securitisation fund consisting of one or several co-ownerships or one or several fiduciary estates and managed by a management company. | • SCS • SCSp | • SA, Sàrl, SCA • SAS • SCoSA • SCS • SCSp |
Umbrella structure | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. Application for authorisation as ELTIF of one or more compartments may be submitted | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | No. | Yes. | No. | No. |
Capital requirements | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 6 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 6 months following its authorisation. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 12 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. • Self managed SICAV / SICAF: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 12 months following its authorisation. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the capital requirements applicable to an ELTIF are the capital requirements applicable to fund, in particular due to the national product law. | EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. | EUR 1,000,000 to be reached no later than 24 months following the auhorisation by the CSSF. | • FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the entry into force of the management regulations. • SICAV: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 24 months from the incorporation of the SICAV. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 • SCSA: no minimum capital. | If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a company, it depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 If the securitisation vehicle is set up as a fund, there is no minimum capital requirement. | No minimum capital requirement. | Depends on the form: • SA / SCA: EUR 30,000 • Sàrl: EUR 12,000 No minimum capital requirement for other legal forms. |
Required service providers | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary institution. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • As ELTIF is an EU label, the required service providers for an ELTIF depend on the applicable national product law. • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. However, if the ELTIF is marketed to retail investors, the Depositary shall comply with the UCITS depositary requirements and be a Depositary institution • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Other service providers required by the relevant product rules. | • Management company in case of an FCP. • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | • Management company in case of an FCP • Depositary bank or professional of the financial sector providing depositary services, subject to conditions. • Administrative agent. • Registrar and Transfer Agent. • Approved statutory auditor. | Registered auditor in principle not required unless two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. | • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the securitisation vehicle qualifies as an AIF). • Management company (if the securitisation vehicle is set up in the form of a fund). • Independent auditor. • No depository institution (unless for regulated securisation vehicles). • No administrative agent. | For SCS: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCS qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCS qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). For SCSp: • Alternative Investment Fund Manager (if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF). • No requirement to appoint a depositary (except if the SCSp qualifies as an AIF and is managed by a duly authorised AIFM). | Registered auditor in principle not required unless the company is an AIF managed by an AIFM with AUM above the threshold or two of the following criteria are met: (i) net turnover above EUR 8.8 million, (ii) balance sheet above EUR 4.4 million and (iii) average number of employees above 50. However, depending on the legal form of the company, there may be an obligation to appoint a commissaire aux comptes. On 28 July 2023, draft bill 8286 (the Draft Bill) was released, aiming to overhaul Luxembourg accounting law applicable to undertakings (the New Law). It is expected to be adopted in 2025. |
Possibility of listing | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes, but difficult in practice. | Yes. | No. | No. | In principle, no. The SCS/SCSp may however issue debt securities that are eligible to be listed on the stock exchange. | Yes. |
European passport | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | Yes. | No. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. | No, unless it falls under the scope of the full AIFMD regime. |
Net asset value (NAV) calculation and redemption frequency | The UCITS must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least twice a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. | The UCIs must make public the issue, sale and repurchase price of their units each time they issue, sell and repurchase their units, and at least once a month. As ELTIF is an EU label, the NAV computation and redemption frequency depend on applicable national product law and the AIFM law. At least once a year for reporting purposes. Redemption frequency: In principle closed-ended, but may be open-ended provided certain safeguards are set up, inter alia: - redemptions are not granted before the end of a minimum holding period or before the date specified in the rules or instruments of incorporation - at the time of authorisation and throughout the life of the ELTIF, the manager is able to demonstrate that the ELTIF has an appropriate redemption policy and LMTs compatible with the long-term strategy of the ELTIF; - redemptions are limited to a percentage of the UCITS (liquid) assets of the ELTIF. An ELTIF may offer, under certain conditions, early redemption rights to its investors according to the ELTIF's investment strategy. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | At least once a year for reporting purposes. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. | Not required. |
Overall income tax (corporate income tax and municipal business tax) | No income tax. | No income tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate: 23.87%. In certain cases, reduced corporate income tax rates may apply. Income derived from transferable securities (e.g. dividends received and capital gains realised on the sale of shares) is exempt. Income on cash held for the purpose of a future investment is also exempt (for one year). | No income tax, unless investing only in risk capital, then SICAR tax regime applicable. | No income tax. | • General aggregate rate for taxable securisation companies: 23.87%. Securitisation vehicles should be able to deduct from their gross profits their operational costs and the dividends or interests distributed to the shareholders/creditors. Therefore securitisation companies should not generate significant taxable profits and should therefore to a large extent be tax neutral. | No corporate income tax applicable. Municipal business tax of 6.75% applicable in very limited circumstances, namely in case the SCS/SCSp (i) carries out a commercial activity or (ii) is deemed to carry out a commercial activity. A SCS/SCSp is deemed to carry out a commercial activity if its general partner is a Luxembourg public or private limited liability company holding at least 5% of the partnership interests. With a proper structuring of the GPs partnership interest it should be possible to avoid the deemed commercial characterisation of the SCS/SCSp. | General aggregate rate: 23.87%, but 100% exemption for dividends, liquidation proceeds and capital gains from qualifying participations. |
Subscription tax (NAV: net asset value) | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.05% of the NAV annually. • Reduction: 0.01% of the NAV annually in certain specific cases. • Where the proportion of net assets of a UCITS or one of its compartments in certain Taxonomy-sustainable activities represents at least 5 per cent of the aggregate net assets of the UCITS or of its relevant compartment, the subscription tax rate is 0.04 per cent. Where the proportion of such assets is at least 20 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.03 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 35 %, the subscription tax rate amounts to 0.02 per cent. Where the proportion is at least 50 per cent, this rate amounts to 0.01 per cent. However, net assets in nuclear energy and fossil gaseous fuel are excluded from such decreased rates. • Tax exemptions: special institutional money market cash funds, special pension funds (including pension pooling vehicles) and funds investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Tax exemptions: certain money market and pension funds or SIFs investing in other funds which are already subject to subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | • Rate: 0.01% of the NAV annually. • Exemptions apply. | Annual subscription tax of 0.25% on the amount of paid up capital and issue premium (if any). | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. | No subscription tax. |
Wealth tax | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | No wealth tax. | 0.5% on a taxable base of up to EUR 500 million. As of 1 January 2025, there is progressionve net wealth tax based solely on the company's total balance sheet size, regardless of asset composition: • €535 for companies with a total balance sheet up to and including €350,000 • €1,605 for companies with a total balance sheet between €350,001 and €2,000,000 • €4,815 for companies with a total balance sheet exceeding €2,000,000 |
Withholding tax on dividends | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Not subject to withholding tax. | Dividends distributed by a Luxembourg company are in principle subject to withholding tax at a rate of 15%, unless a domestic law exemption or a lower tax treaty rate applies. |
Benefit from Double Tax Treaty network | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | • SICAV/SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). • FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | Yes in case the SICAR is set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). | • RAIFs investing in a portfolfio of risk capital (such as a SICAR) Access if set-up as a corporate entity (except if set-up under the form of a SCS/SCSp). • RAIFs not investing in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR), but set-up as: SICAV / SICAF: Limited to certain double tax treaties (see circular L.G. -A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017). FCP: see circular L.G.-A n°61 of the tax administration of 8 December 2017. | No. | Yes for securitisation companies. | No. | Yes. |
Benefit from the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive | No. | No. | As ELTIF is an EU label the tax treatment depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. | No. | In principle yes, but certain jurisdictions where the target companies are located may challenge the application of the directive. | No, unless RAIF that invests in a portfolio of risk capital (such as a SICAR). | No. | Yes. | No. | Yes. |
Thin capitalization rules (debt-toequity ratio) | Borrowings of up to 10% of net assets to finance redemptions (it should be a short term borrowing and cannot be for investment purposes) or to buy real estate for its business. The total borrowing under the above may not exceed 15% of net assets. | Borrowings of up to 25% of net assets without any restrictions are allowed. | As ELTIF is an EU label, the debt-to-equity ratio depends on the national product rules applicable to the AIF. Borrowings of cash of up to 50% of the NAV of the ELTIF marketed to retail investors and up to 100% for the ELTIF marketed solely to professional investors. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | Tax of 0.25% on the debt that exceeds 8 times the paid-up capital increased by the issue premium. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No debt-to-equity ratio. | No provision in Luxembourg law. However, there is a specific administrative practice. |